The Air Traffic Controller Who Paid The Ultimate Price For a Systemic Failure

The other day, I watched an episode of ‘Mayday: Air Disaster’ that featured the überlingen mid-air collision that occurred in 2002. It was a very sad day in aviation history for many reasons, and it prompted me to take a deeper dive into this tragic accident. Why? Because, although I am no ATC expert, it hit a nerve regarding deficiencies in safety culture and flawed systemic processes, which continue to occur in ALL segments of our aviation industry. And what makes this accident even more tragic is that Peter Nielsen, the air traffic controller who committed the “active error,” was murdered in 2004 as an act of revenge by Vitaly Kaloyev, whose wife and two children had been killed in the accident.

Brief Synopsis of the Accident

On July 1st, 2002, BAL Bashkirian Airlines Flight 2937, (a Tupolev Tu-154M passenger jet), and DHL Flight 611, (a Boeing 757 cargo jet), collided in midair over überlingen, Germany. All occupants aboard both planes were killed (71 total fatalities). The official investigation identified the main cause of the collision to be a number of shortcomings on the part of the Swiss ATC service in charge of the sector involved, as well as ambiguities in the procedures regarding the use of the Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) onboard.

?

“Trigger Pullers” for Organizational Failures

Like so many accidents that occur, there are a number of contributing factors, or links in the chain, that are precursors to the end-state event. This accident was no exception. On the day of the accident, the controller (Nielsen) was what I call the trigger puller (or enabler) for upstream, unmitigated, organizational failures just waiting for the opportunity for the final active error to occur. That opportunity was realized on July 1st, 2002 at 21:35:32 hours when two commercial jet aircraft experienced an unsurvivable mid-air collision. Skyguide (the ATC facility in Switzerland which was handling the flights) initially blamed the Russian pilot for the accident, but later accepted full responsibility, and investigators found that there were deficiencies in Nielsen's handling of the collision course between the two aircraft.

Nielsen himself admitted his responsibility saying, “As a father, I sense that this loss leaves a gap that will hurt. On the night of the accident, I was part of a network of people, computers, monitoring and transmission devices, and regulations. All these parts must work together seamlessly and without error, and they must be synchronized. As an air traffic controller, it is my task and duty to prevent such accidents. So many children lost their lives (46 of the passengers were Russian schoolchildren) and so many hopes for the future were erased." Nielsen had a nervous breakdown shortly afterwards and spent a long time in therapy and on antidepressants and never returned to work in his former job (source ).

As if Nielsen didn’t suffer enough from the ensuing psychological trauma, he also paid the ultimate price by being stabbed to death in the presence of his wife and three children. But was Nielsen personally responsible for the accident or was he simply the trigger puller for an organizational accident waiting to happen? On that particular day, at that particular time, all the holes in the “Swiss cheese” lined up. Nielsen was just the trigger puller...

To continue reading this article, please click here