The Air Pollution Paradox: How Amsterdam Punishes Its Residents Twice

The Air Pollution Paradox: How Amsterdam Punishes Its Residents Twice

Amsterdam, a city ranking high in sustainability indexes, is home to a new initiative: The TreeWiFi. The young startup behind the initiative has hung a bunch of birdhouses around the city that provide their surroundings with free wifi internet access. However, when air pollution around a treehouse exceeds a predefined limit, the internet access is turned off. The founder of the project hopes that these treehouses will reduce air pollution in the Dutch capital.

At first glance, that is a beautiful innovation: rewarding residents for keeping their neighborhood clean. However, a deeper look at the TreeWiFi concept reveals a downside it shares with many other social innovation startups: it is really unclear if it can solve anything. While I am sure that the intentions of the people of TreeWifi are great, the gimmick of turning on only when air pollution drops actually misses the point.

AIR POLLUTION IN CITIES

In 2015 Friends of the Earth Netherlands measured air pollution in 59 different locations in several Dutch cities, including Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, and Utrecht. They found that in 11 of these sites, air pollution exceeded the EU limit of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) of 40 μg/m3 a year.

Breathing nitrogen dioxide in high levels increases the likelihood of respiratory problems, inflames the lining of the lungs, and can reduce immunity to lung infections. The Australian Government’s Department of the Environment also states that high levels of Nitrogen dioxide can “cause problems such as wheezing, coughing, colds, flu and bronchitis”.

And what brings nitrogen dioxide to our cities? That is right, cars. To be precise, some 80% the nitrogen dioxide in cities comes from motor vehicle exhaust, according to the Australians. The report by the Dutch Friends of the Earth came to the same obvious conclusion: ‘the busier the road, the worse the air quality.'

The sad side of the air pollution in our cities is that it seems that minorities and poorer people end up living next to pollution hazards. When the housing market is more open to you, you’d probably not choose to live right next to a congested highway. Money can't buy you love, but it can help your lungs stay clean. While it is unclear that this is the situation in the Netherlands, it is worth further investigation.

Another aspect of the ‘Air Pollution Paradox’ is that communities that use the car the most are enjoying better air quality. A thorough research in the UK has found that ”communities that have access to fewest cars tend to suffer from the highest levels of air pollution, whereas those in which car ownership is greatest enjoy the cleanest air." We are currently running the numbers to see if this is also the case in the Netherlands. We will come with an update on this soon.

UNSOCIAL CARROT AND STICK?

TreeWifi is designed as an incentive to residents to combat air pollution in their neighborhoods. However, it is uncertain that the people living in these polluted areas are the cause of the problem. If they are not, then it is questionable that they can even solve it. It seems more likely that the source of the problem is car-drivers, many of which live in their comfortable clean-air-suburbs, that commute with their nitrogen dioxide polluters.

Another aspect of the ‘Air Pollution Paradox’ is that communities that use the car the most are enjoying better air quality

The birdhouses are a cute gimmick, but they sadly seem to penalize the wrong people. In the end, it is the decision-makers – politicians, policy makers and planners – that shape how car-centric our cities are. A social innovation startup that wants to tackle air pollution should punish the real people who create air pollution.

So here’s a suggestion: why not make birdhouses that block the WiFi signal of pro-cars politicians. In that case, the birdhouses will at least penalize those who are responsible for the pollution and not those who suffer from it.

Note: This Post Was Originally Published on LVBLCITY, where Sascha Benes and I are promoting livable and lovable cities.

Jacques Klok

Beleggen en vermogensadvies

7 年

Well it could also be that people born with bad health have a lower IQ because of this. Which in turn makes them earn less. Thats why they end up in the cheaper housing. Typically those will be noisier with more indoor and outdoor pollution etc. Leading to a shorter life etc.

回复
Tim Bouwmeester

Passionate about building products with a digital heart | IKEA

7 年

Good article, Lior. I tend to agree with your statement: I live right in the heart of Amsterdam. Only in a few instances per year I regrent not having a car. Waiting a minimum of 2,5 years to obtain a parking permit is also a big factor in not owning a car. I'd like to know, though, how good/bad the air quality is in my neighborhood or even in my house. The amount of construction work going on in the area must have an (negative) effect, surely.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Lior Steinberg的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了