Air Cooled Chiller Efficiency?

No alt text provided for this image

Last month I shared what ETC Group has learned with water cooled chillers. Unfortunately this month I am exposing how little we know about air cooled chillers. My goal is to push chiller manufacturers to support our industry in making air cooled chillers more efficient.

At least 20 years ago the refrigeration industry began focusing on reducing compressor energy. I am getting old but not old enough to know who took the lead; refrigeration vendors or large water-cooled chiller manufacturers. Since cooling compressor power decreases with lower lift (difference in pressure between condenser and evaporator), both industries focused on dropping the condenser pressure/temperature.

What about air cooled chillers? As more and more owners "simplify" their equipment, we see an expanded use of air cooled chillers vs water cooled chillers with cooling towers. We see air cooled chillers up to 500 tons, we see them serving year-round process cooling loads, and we have seen 5 to 10 of them in a single plant. So the original assumptions that went into their design (1 or 2 serving an office building or school) may no longer by valid and a deeper look is required.

Our curiosity into air cooled chillers first started when we not only noticed condenser fans cycling off when it was 60F outside but we also saw fans cycling off when it was 90F outside.

We have done literature searches and we have contacted the major manufacturers. This is the little bit that we have learned or heard:

  • Air-cooled chillers are designed to keep a minimum lift (condensing pressure – evaporating pressure) assuming that the chiller will have its leaving set point reset up to 60F.
  • The condensing pressure is set in the factory. This setting is either not field adjustable or only adjustable at the chiller.
  • No chiller points are connected to the BAS to reset the condensing pressure/temperature
  • A high enough lift has to be maintained to move refrigerant through the expansion valve
  • Screw chillers require a high enough lift to prevent major problems.
  • High enough lift is required for proper oil management.
  • Free-cooling add-ons are the only option for reducing power during cold conditions. But SLC has 5,000 hours between 40F (when free-cooling would work) and 75F where better condensing control would deliver energy savings.

In general, we see chillers making 45F chilled water with condensing temperatures around 105F. If these chillers could operate in cold weather with 70F condensing temperature, you could potentially save 30% to 40% of the chiller power.

How can we get:

  • Vendors to support operating changes to maximize chiller efficiency?
  • Vendors to re-evaluate their chiller designs to maximize year-round efficiency for the ways air cooled chillers are actually operated?

We will keep searching for answers and will share whatever we learn. If anybody has relevant information, please share.

Paul Mikii Abuel, MASc, EIT, CEM

Building Energy Engineer at CopperTree Analytics

5 年

Nice article Glenn! Agree 100% on the topic! May I add on your point, about having enough lift for oil management, that most screw chiller manufacturers don't use an oil pump on their units (some may have them optional). Not sure why, but majority of them not only use the oil system for lubrication, they also use them for load control and other regulation devices (ex: slide vane). Understand that they need to keep lift to have DP and circulation, but I think once they could decouple those function using an oil pump, they could cross out that requirement of maintaining the high side pressure.

Rafael Navarro

Sustainability and Energy Architect and Auditor @ Johnson Controls | PMP, Six Sigma, Data Management Expert

5 年

Excellent points in this article. The root cause might be that there is no incentive for vendors to make the existing chillers more efficient. They are focused on selling new chillers.

Bryan Lang PE, CEM, MBA

Pioneering sustainability and energy efficiency

5 年

Great article, Glen! Regarding your note about the condenser refrigerant temperature not being adjustable, even if it is, not all technicians know where it is, how to manipulate it, or that it needs to be adjusted in small increments. Can't wait to see what more information you can dig up!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Glen Anderson, PE的更多文章

  • Electricity Pricing Paradigm Shift

    Electricity Pricing Paradigm Shift

    As many of you have already heard me say, we are trying to remake an energy industry in ~ 15 years that had taken…

    8 条评论
  • How Do We Electrify Heating in Cold Climates?

    How Do We Electrify Heating in Cold Climates?

    2 months ago, I posted about the need to electrify heating systems, both for economic reasons and to reduce carbon…

    22 条评论
  • Where does Hydrogen fit into Low Carbon Heating?

    Where does Hydrogen fit into Low Carbon Heating?

    Last week, I provided an argument for people to begin electrifying their heating systems. In the near future, I will…

    4 条评论
  • Why Electrify your Heating Systems?

    Why Electrify your Heating Systems?

    Over the last 2 months I have been asked multiple times why facilities should electrify their heating. There are 2…

    4 条评论
  • Refrigeration System Monitoring

    Refrigeration System Monitoring

    We are continually surprised at what we learn if we just have the data. The following graph shows operations from a new…

  • The Value of Fault Detection and MBCx For Chillers

    The Value of Fault Detection and MBCx For Chillers

    We are always asked "What can I save by installing Fault Detection Software or starting a Monitoring Based…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了