IT Ain’t Heavy, It’s My Technology

IT Ain’t Heavy, It’s My Technology


Exploring technical debt from the

perspective of governance and growth

 

Imagine a 100-year-old apple tree standing over 30 feet high. What you see above ground exists also below ground. The roots go as deep as the tree is high and can extend to twice the width as do the branches extend outward. It is how the massive tree survives high winds, too much or not enough rain, competition from other roots, virtually anything nature wishes to throw at it. But what if the branches exceeded the width of the roots or the tree grew twice as tall as the roots were deep? It wouldn’t take much of a wind to blow it over nor drought to starve it. Imagine this same tree but it is now representative of your company. The branches are the support/vendor contracts, technology and resources which support the conduct of your business. The roots are the core of your business; the contracts and customers you have in place. Do you have the symmetry you would hope for; just enough technology and resources to do what you need to do, deliver a product or support your customers? If you are like most companies the height of your branches far exceed the depth of your roots and the width of the branches exceed the width of the root base and the chances are very good that the longer you have been in business the worse the situation. This is referred to as technical debt.

Technical debt takes on many forms whether simply too much or unneeded technology or unnecessarily complex systems which have been modified with custom code in an effort to make them work together. This is much akin to using a shoehorn to put a size 11 foot into a size 7 glass slipper – it is the right tool for the function but even the right tool in this case can’t do the job and something bad is bound to happen!

Technical debt also takes on the form of standalone disparate systems which are not integrated with anything else in your environment. Too, technical solutions from many different vendors create technical debt and drive total cost of ownership through the roof i.e. storage systems from five different vendors require 5 different people with 5 different skill sets to operate and maintain those 5 different systems. Often, technical debt takes on the look of many systems which perform the same basic function(s) (technical overlap) for which you are paying many times. Further still, this debt is created by having several contracts with the same vendor for the same application, service or device across different locations of the company. Scale is not applied universally in this scenario and costs are predictably higher (several x in some cases). 

If this sounds or feels about right – you are not alone! Not being alone however, doesn’t fix the problem. There are steps that can be taken to figure out what needs to be done, in what order they should be executed and how much it will both cost and save you by executing the necessary actions to eliminate the bad technical debt.

A great step is to add a formal information and technology advisor to the board of directors as part of the advisory board; not just to inform the technical vision but to identify and inform the opportunity and risks and to make ‘technology as a growth catalyst’ part of the normal agenda. This establishes a top-down advocacy for matters related to technology. In addition, this creates a conduit through which the achievement of corporate strategy can be realized, and value accelerated using the lever of technology for the purpose of competitive differentiation. Clearly, adding this role does not speak directly to eliminating technical debt. However, to take the steps necessary to declutter, simplify and transform the company you will need advocacy at the highest level.

Step one is recognizing there is a problem and is where it all begins. If you believe your technical debt ain’t heavy, you are in denial or very rarified air - see step one. Step two. . ., that’s a story for another day.

Shaw Lively

Executive Communities and Private Knowledge Exchange

5 年

Excellent theme--hope it wakes some C Suite denizens up!

Clive Porter-Brown

Associate Director, ESM & EaaS Practice

5 年

Insightful as always and I can draw a line from this article back to your previous article, where you describe the situation as a result of IT and the business pulling in opposite directions. Every business will suffer technical debt as a result of growth, but how this is handled and managed is typically cultural, not in the people per se but in the organisation. The symptoms of disparity that you highlight essentially come down to a model of management by component rather than management by service and this is a common failing across many IT departments which is reflected in the way that they manage their costs. This, in turn, is brought about by failing to work together with the business and take an holistic view on what is happening. So yes, the external eyes are a great addition to supporting the strategic direction. I would be interested to see how many IT operations would welcome this view and work with it and how many would pull up the drawbridge? Extending this to your scenario, how many are tending the tree to keep the balance and how many are out in the branches focusing on saving a leaf? There is an old anecdote about some animals in a cage and each time they go over a line drawn on the floor to get some food, they get hurt. So they learn to stop going over the line and only take what is fed them on their side of the line. Rotating the animals and the original animals will stop the new animals from hurting themselves, this continues until none of the original animals are left. Now, none of the animals will go over the line and the person who trained the first group has long since gone. So this continue with the big pile of food over the line but none will dare go near it, but no animal knows why, That is just the way thing are round here. That is organisational culture! People become the culture and culture becomes the person, even though that originator will have moved on some time ago. Enter the challenger. The challenger asks why do we do this and is not too surprised to be told that no-one knows, it is just the way of things. So the challenger can start putting this too the test and showing there can be another way. But the challenger also knows that handling this with kid gloves is key. The challenger needs support and engagement and for this to be successful, be holistic in their approach. Do not side step the resistor, but do what it takes to make them a supporter. Use your supporters to help spread the word and they no longer become the lone voice. But this also take hard work, there is no magic pill, if you have 10 people you need 10 strategies, be they direct or indirect approaches. I say strategy because it is also unlikely to be successful on the first attempt, so you need to keep at it and find what works for each of your targets. It is a form of dogma that we all carry with us, it becomes part of the toolkit and we aim to communicate this to others, showing that there can be other better ways. Not always without pain, but the end goal is what makes it worth it. True that some individuals are better at it than others, but that is the nature of things with no 2 people being alike. As any musician will tell you, they did not become accomplished by picking up an instrument, they became accomplished through lots of practice, making mistakes, learning from them and improving in what works. And so to the challenge of establishing the much needed advisory capacity. Depending upon the remit and the business situation, I identified 3 scenarios that might see the need; 1 – (Reactive) a business starts failing and has the insight to look beyond its borders and recognises that it needs help to fix things. 2 – (Active) a business wants to benchmark itself against the competition and identify how it can differentiate itself, gaining a competitive advantage. 3 – (Pro-Active) a business recognises that to get ahead and stay there it must constantly evolve. 3 different levels of maturity and all will need to start from where they are today, but because of the question being asked, each will be looking for different outcomes which can be measured in the Operational, Tactical and Strategic measures that are put in place as a result. What is the starting point? It is a business that wants to change.

回复
Derrick Clarke

Head of IT and Business System

5 年

Great article Clark. I look forward to reading step two in the near future.

Jean-Philippe Galivel

Directeur des Systèmes d'Information | Directeur Informatique | Corporate IT Senior Director for Business Systems | DSI

5 年

Clark, this is an absolute perfect analogy.... And we should not forget that there is another element that can destroy this old experienced tree if there is a risk with wind and drought. The famous lumberjack comes with its enormous saw and cut it...and it should sound familiar to some people in the very recent past. The fit for purpose and the partnership of technology and business is key to the success and will provide a long life to this tree. And as you say, attendance of IT leadership at the board is key.

Eric Cowperthwaite

COO at ThreatHunter.ai

5 年

executive sponsorship is critical to innovation.?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Clark Brown的更多文章

  • Pressure. . . What Pressure?

    Pressure. . . What Pressure?

    Current Crisis With what is going on in the world right now, sparked by the COVID-19 virus, those in IT are uniquely…

  • Creating A Roadmap Just Got Easier

    Creating A Roadmap Just Got Easier

    It is a common theme today for business leaders to make the comment that architecture groups, as they relate to…

    2 条评论
  • I'm bleeding but its ok; it's internal!

    I'm bleeding but its ok; it's internal!

    Internal bleeding (invisible spend) is still bleeding, and because it's not immediately seen, or treated, it often has…

    11 条评论
  • Transformation - we are here but there seems like a better place! What one thing must occur for a successful change in any company?

    Transformation - we are here but there seems like a better place! What one thing must occur for a successful change in any company?

    The Grass is(n't) Greener The grass isn’t always greener on the other side of the fence or so is said. It used to be…

    15 条评论
  • I’m Giving You All She’s Got Captain!

    I’m Giving You All She’s Got Captain!

    Delivering the Maximum Value of Technology In the television series Star Trek1, invariably, the crew would be trying to…

    5 条评论
  • Peek-A-Boo, I See You!

    Peek-A-Boo, I See You!

    Transparency is Hard--And Scary! Introduction As a parent, playing the peek-a-boo game always brought me a lot of joy…

    7 条评论
  • Change is awesome! . . .or not .

    Change is awesome! . . .or not .

    What one thing must occur to ensure success for any BIG change in any company? The adrenaline rush brought about by the…

    42 条评论
  • I CAN SEE IT FROM HERE

    I CAN SEE IT FROM HERE

    COMPLIANCE OR ENGAGEMENT – YOUR CHOICE A change control manager who was very long on control, short on change and much…

    31 条评论
  • From Estranged Technologist to Trusted Advisor “. . . rule the world! But how?

    From Estranged Technologist to Trusted Advisor “. . . rule the world! But how?

    Have you ever felt frustrated by having your well-thought-out recommendation completely ignored or rejected out of hand…

    42 条评论
  • Unique Me!

    Unique Me!

    When faced with the need to implement or upgrade a critical business system, a common, if not natural reflex is to…

    12 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了