#AIFail - another device bites the dust
Marco van Hurne
I build Agentic AI companies | Data Science Strategist @ Beyond the Cloud | Data Governance | AI Compliance Officer Certified
To top off the week, I have a few things I'd like to get off my chest. Since I am a geek and fond of gadgets, I try to get as many of them in my hands as possible. My latest purchase was the R1. It wasn't great. It could just have been an app and not an app in a piece of dedicated hardware. I would have only lost a few bucks instead of 200US. This device is going straight to my own museum of modern arts in ..... the basement. So the only thing left for me to do now, it to write about it so you won't have to. Here is an overview of the latest Fails in AI. Set your inner cynic free and enjoy !
Before we start!
If you like this topic and you want to support me:
Apart from the announced launch of GPT4o and Google's Astra release, this month featured a few broken AI gizmo's. There was the launch of the pretty broken Humane AIPin. There have been weird stories of Meta’s AI saying strange things, and the AI-generated content plastered all over the platform — including viral images of dead children — is ruining what’s left of the user experience. And we have the release of the Rabbit r1, and you guessed it, it’s another unfinished, barely functioning device that delivers very little of what it promised and does the few things it can do very slowly and very incorrectly. But hey, at least it’s colorful?
If you need evidence, watch this excruciating video of Rabbit founder Jesse Lyu trying to order from DoorDash through the device in front of a live audience. It’s mind-numbingly slow, and doesn’t work the first time. Considering DoorDash is one of only FOUR apps the device can integrate with at launch, we’re not off to the best start. It’s also been compounded by poor reviews, most of which say something along the lines of “cool looking device that doesn’t do much.” AI devices are certainly setting a trend, though not quite the “next smartphone killer” one they were aiming for.
I like the way Ryan Broderick put it in his newsletter, Garbage Day —
“The R1 launching unfinished and useless is actually exactly what the AI boom is all about. Finding — and automating — new ways to get people to pay for worse versions of what they already have.”
Tasty. This takedown from Dave2D was also a great mic drop moment.
Of course, the Rabbit founders have followed the ‘if it’s broken, ship it’ playbook to a tee. They’ve responded to criticism of the device — lack of uses, slow and laggy, awful battery, cumbersome usability — with the usual ploy: roadmaps of future features, promises and the “we’re a small team, give us time” sympathy call. Unfortunately for them, it seems consumers have had enough of this bullcrap. The defensive nature of Rabbit’s PR hasn’t helped either. I get it; it sucks to have people dunk on your work, but attacking back is rarely the best option. It only encourages the pile on — and pile on they have.
Nifty hackers have been looking at its underbelly and have discovered that the device that should have been an app is literally an app. It appears to run Android under the hood and the entire interface users interact with is powered by a single Android app. The Rabbit founders have responded by saying that this is untrue, but they also said in their statement that “rabbit OS and LAM run on the cloud with very bespoke AOSP.” Well, AOSP is the Android Open Source Project, and the fact there’s no subscription to any kind of cloud service means the cloud claim is a little dubious.
An AI researcher shared some screens of the leaked (and now deleted) source code, claiming there is no artificial intelligence behind the device at all. Someone else discovered that the process to login to the four apps is more than a little sketchy and potentially insecure — it could allow Rabbit to see your credentials. Yikes.
Subscribe to the TechTonic Shifts newsletter
This is out of my wheelhouse, but it doesn’t seem like it’s quite the AI device the founders have been selling it as. It turns out that we should have seen this coming. Someone was digging into the founder’s past and unearthed that Jesse was previously behind a grifty NFT project called Gama. (Here’s a great thread with more details on another abandoned Web3 dream nightmare.)
Who would have guessed it?
It’s another example of the good ol’ NFT to AI switch up. At this point, we can assume Jesse also had a dabble in Crypto to, completing the grifter trifecta.
领英推荐
Details are hard to find on the project because it’s been deleted, and so have videos that show Jesse speaking about it. But, thanks to the wonders of Web.Archive, we can see it in all its glory. Want to know how bad it is? It opens with this line: “Gama is building the principles of the future through its next generation metaverse, the Game Space Station.” It also promises “a new world of entertainment.”
Did Gama usher in this next generation metaverse? Or a new world of entertainment? Absolutely not. The project was nothing more than a rug pull, with Jesse doing a disappearing act on the project’s Discord channel and seemingly pocketing a lot of the money from the initial NFT sales.
I’m not suggesting it means anything — founders try and fail all the time — but when you try to bury the evidence of previous ventures and then follow it up with a barely working device that just so happens to coincide with the newest “next big thing”… all signs point to this being another project that hoped to suck as much money as possible before it was exposed as a piece of plastic trash. And let’s be honest, the device is as good as dead. While the team will push out some updates and shout loudly about its future potential, the interest will have waned long before it lives up to even the vague promises it made.
There’s going to be no rabbit pulled from this hat.
I don’t know about you, but I’m sick of AI folks telling me they’re creating the future only to deliver absolute garbage. I’m tired of grifters jumping from Crypto to NFTs to AI, burning through millions in VC cash — and the money of consumers — telling us they’re going to change the world and producing nothing of note. I’m sick of people like Sam Altman waxing lyrical about how “he doesn’t care if he burns through $50 billion a year” to create AGI when he and his cult followers can’t even explain what AGI is or how/why it’ll benefit humanity. Who the fuck is this guy? I’m fed up with everyone telling me it’s going to change how I work, or if I work, when the current outputs are doing nothing but de-leveling the market.
The current AI rhetoric is sociopathically disconnected from reality.
If AI is really going to be revolutionary, it’s time to start delivering the evidence. Not more ifs, buts and maybes. Not high-level, world-changing statements. Not the same statements spouted by the same people over and over. We need real, tangible evidence of the net gain to society.
If the Rabbit, and the Humane Pin are as good as it gets, this revolution is going to go out with a whimper.
Well, that's a wrap for today. Tomorrow, I'll have a fresh episode of TechTonic Shifts for you. If you enjoy my writing and want to support my work, feel free to buy me a coffee ??
Think a friend would enjoy this too? Share the newsletter and let them join the conversation. LinkedIn appreciates your likes by making my articles available to more readers.
Signing off - Marco
Top-rated articles:
Technical Project Manager | B2C & B2B Project Delivery Manager | Technical Project Coordinator | 9+ Years Experience in Mobile Development | System Integration | E-Commerce domains
6 个月Marco van Hurne, I just wanted to say a big thank you for this article! It's so insightful and gives me a chance to take a fresh look at all of this hype that's going on today.