AI Transformation: Is ROI the right metric to focus at this stage?
Sandeep Mangaraj
Managing Director @ Microsoft | Helping Fintechs innovate, scale and optimize with Microsoft Cloud
The year is 1900.?You're the CEO of the leading horse-drawn buggy manufacturer,?renowned for your craftsmanship and efficiency.?The winds of change,?however,?are blowing. The first automobiles are sputtering onto the streets,?clunky and unreliable,?but hinting at a future where horses are relegated to pastures and racetracks.?The question looms:?Will doubling down on buggy manufacturing efficiency,?perhaps by streamlining your assembly line or sourcing cheaper leather,?help you compete in this new era?
The answer (with the benefit of hindsight) is a resounding no.?The automobile isn't just a better buggy; it's a fundamentally different mode of transportation,?one that will redefine the very concept of mobility.?No amount of buggy optimization will bridge that gap.
Yet,?in the face of the AI revolution,?a similar narrative is playing out.?An increasingly large number of analysts, investors and the press are questioning the ROI of AI investments,?how to measure their success,?how to ensure they deliver tangible value.?Is this a focus on optimization,?on squeezing incremental gains from a technology that promises exponential change?
The field of finance offers a compelling lens through which to view this challenge:?the concept of "real options." Rooted in the Black-Scholes model for pricing financial options,?real options theory extends this framework to the realm of business investments.?It recognizes that strategic decisions,?particularly in innovative or volatile sectors, are rarely one-off events.?Instead,?they often unfold in stages,?with each step contingent on the outcomes of previous ones and with decision makers having the ability to react to new information. This creates a series of options - the right,?but not the obligation,?to take further action.?The value of these options lies not just in the immediate payoff,?but in the flexibility and potential they offer in the face of an uncertain future.?In essence, real options theory provides a structured way to quantify the value of "keeping your options open" in a world where the only constant is change.
Let's ground this concept in a concrete example.?Imagine you're the head of customer service at a large financial services firm.?You've been following all the news around Gen AI and have heard it has applicability in enabling AI-powered customer service agents. However, you are staring at a multi-million dollar implementation at a time when budgets are tight. Instead of viewing this as a binary "invest or don't invest" decision,?let's apply a real options lens:
Expand:?If the AI agent proves successful,?you can exercise your option to scale it across your customer service operations.
领英推荐
Pivot:?If the initial results are mixed,?you might pivot,?using the insights gained to refine the AI agent's capabilities or target it to different use cases.
Abandon:?If the pilot is a clear failure,?you can cut your losses and explore alternative solutions.?The key is that you haven't committed to a full-scale deployment until you have more information.
The challenge then lies in determining the appropriate allocation for these "growth bets." While there's no one-size-fits-all answer,?the principle of portfolio diversification offers guidance.?Just as a financial portfolio balances more stable bonds with high-risk,?high-reward stocks,?an AI investment strategy should include a mix of core AI initiatives aimed at improving existing processes and transformational AI bets that could fundamentally change your business.
The exact allocation will depend on your organization's risk appetite,?strategic objectives,?and industry dynamics. However,?it's crucial to allocate some portion of your change budget to these transformational bets, otherwise, you could be missing the forest for the trees – like the anecdotal carriage CEO we started this article with.
The real options mindset encourages you to view these transformational bets not as isolated gambles but as part of a broader portfolio.?Some bets may fail,?but the learnings from those failures can inform future successes.?And when one of those moonshots’ hits,?the payoff can be transformative,?propelling your organization to new heights in the AI-powered future.
In the beginning of this AI era,?the ability to test and learn is paramount.?Real options theory provides a framework for embracing uncertainty, making informed decisions,?and ultimately thriving in a world of constant change.
Independent Law Practice Professional
2 个月Congrats Sandeep .Trust and sensitivity in response to investors demands would certainly augur better projections.?
Corporate America’s Financial Planner | Family Planning | Tax Efficiency | RSUs/Stock Options | Retirement Planning | Generational Wealth Building | Financial Advisor & Growth & Development Director | CLU?
2 个月Appreciated the focus on using AI as a strategic guide. It’s clear that approaching AI with a clear direction can help ensure it delivers meaningful and impactful results.
Global Financial Services Lead | Strategic Partnerships Lead | RBI Fintech Scout | AI, ML, Intelligent Automation | Banking, FX & Payments | TEDx & Keynote Speaker
2 个月Very interesting analogy Sandeep Mangaraj - thanks for sharing! To take it further, I'd also venture to say the biggest gains and asymmetric returns will be from tail risk - to those investing at the moment in low delta options. Structural changes that bank on more than just automation and optimisation of current processes will lead to true benefits of AI. What remains to be seen is who trades the 'smile' best!
Founder, consultant, technologist. Currently building isAI - a system to promote AI legal conformance. Consulting on AI investment strategies (hype avoidance, value identification...) and system architectures.
2 个月I like the concept of building real world options and this has clearly been MSFT's strategy across its AI investments. I also like the idea of suspending some conventional financial measures because conventional financial appraisal doesn't work when the variation in the assumption set is too wide. However, this doesn't work forever. All options contain implicit pricing. What might be better is a move to considering the economics of some of these systems. Some investors are becoming nervous that a broad range of use cases are never going to be economically viable. The other thing that concerns me is the emergence of what looks like a big-tech trust around OpenAI. Real options can turn sour in a number of ways. https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/michaelhobbs2_openai-microsoft-nvidia-activity-7235572151162982400--TWK?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
Technology Transformation Growth Leader | Financial Services | Managing Director at Accenture
2 个月Love the concept and guidance. The evaluation at each stage is critical. The measure of success is key, which should be defined ahead of time. Thanks for sharing your th thoughts.