AI Will Take Your Job!!!

AI Will Take Your Job!!!

The Wall Street Journal says AI is coming for our jobs! ?? ?? ??

Uh-huh. Let's unpack this.

The list of white-collar layoffs is growing almost daily, including job cuts at Google, Duolingo, and UPS in recent weeks.

Google is hiring more people for AI development and cutting in other areas. AI isn't replacing those workers. Google is shifting its investments. That's true for most of the recent tech sector layoffs.

Duolingo isn't cutting jobs at all. They plan to reduce the use of contractors and use GenAI to create first drafts (which employees will review and edit.)?

Okay, so if you're a freelancer and all you do is create first drafts, you may want to learn something new. FWIW, much of the work I see from freelance writers is garbage.

UPS said that it would cut 12,000 jobs—primarily those of management staff and some contract workers—and that those positions weren’t likely to return even when the package-shipping business picks up again. The company has ramped up its use of machine learning in processes such as determining what to charge customers for shipments. As a result, the company’s pricing department has needed fewer people.

Doubtful that UPS had 12,000 people in the pricing department. UPS has delivered four consecutive quarters of declining revenue and earnings per share. Here's a little secret: companies with declining revenue and EPS fire people. AI has nothing to do with it unless they use AI to decide who stays and who goes.

As AI adoption grows, it is likely to reconfigure management hierarchies, the Oliver Wyman study projects.

Oliver Wyman is a strategy consulting firm. Consultancies like McKinsey, BCG, and Wyman cultivate GenAI FOMO because they sell the services panicked executives will need to implement a GenAI strategy. GenAI is the best thing for consultants since Y2K.

According to the analysis, the cascading effect could flatten layers of middle management, the staging ground for senior leadership roles.

I worked for a predecessor of Oliver Wyman from 1984 through 1991. They said exactly the same thing back then. Flattening layers of middle management is every CEO’s wet dream, but it never happens.

More than half of senior white-collar managers surveyed in the study said they thought their jobs could be automated by generative AI, compared with 43% of middle managers and 38% of first-line managers.

I can think of some senior white-collar managers that we can replace with a pet rock. But reality is very different from the perceptions captured in the survey. As a rule, it is easier to automate lower-level jobs than higher-level jobs, that necessarily require human interaction.

Prosus’s web designers, for instance, used to ask software developers to do the coding. Now they can do it themselves.

They got Shiny.

At Chemours, a DuPont spinoff, the company has trained close to 1,000 office and lab workers in AI applications over the past three years. As a result, finance professionals who used to prepare certain reports with a lot of copying and pasting between systems and spreadsheets now do it much faster because of their training with no-code analytic tools.

They bought Alteryx. Big Fucking Deal.




David DeLima Luria

20-year executive, global investment markets. Vice president.

1 年

Clickbait.

Neal Silbert

Insurance Industry Executive Focused on creating bottom-line impact with Generative AI and emerging advanced analytic technologies.

1 年

Thomas W. Dinsmore I like the image of existential angst and Bill Surrette ‘s comment as well. I find it amazing that those who often argue that a technology will change the workforce are also the most likely beneficiaries of the change (services and technology vendors usually). The truth is more transitional and transformational - new jobs are created, some are lost, and many either remain the same or shift focus to the areas the new technology doesn’t handle as well. Back in the 1990s insurance personal lines underwriters were expected to disappear with the introduction of the credit based insurance score and rules engines. While their numbers shrunk over time and increasingly larger percentages of personal lines underwriting is automated, we still have underwriters in the 2020s.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Thomas W. Dinsmore的更多文章

  • 1,095 Days

    1,095 Days

    Three years ago today, my son killed himself. I want to thank everyone – friends, colleagues, and strangers – for the…

    20 条评论
  • Yet Another Public Health Crisis

    Yet Another Public Health Crisis

    There’s a public health emergency brewing here in Massachusetts. Steward Health Care, a private company that operates…

    17 条评论
  • More on AI Venture Funding

    More on AI Venture Funding

    Last week, I wrote about the whales-and-minnows pattern in 2023 AI venture funding. A picture is worth a thousand…

    1 条评论
  • AI Venture Funding in 2023

    AI Venture Funding in 2023

    In 2021, venture funding for AI startups peaked at over $70 billion. Overall funding declined in 2022 and again in 2023.

    11 条评论
  • We're In A Bubble When...

    We're In A Bubble When...

    You can play a fun game with friends while waiting in line at the Employment Office. Take turns completing this…

    19 条评论
  • February 15, 2021

    February 15, 2021

    Two years ago today, my son Thomas killed himself. He was four weeks short of his 30th birthday.

    83 条评论
  • Why We Code

    Why We Code

    "Code-first data science makes no sense." I guess that's true if you spend all day listening to vendor hype.

    34 条评论
  • Boom

    Boom

    The gaslighting never stops. Today, Dan Wright announced that he “made the difficult decision to step down as CEO.

    28 条评论
  • Turmoil at DataRobot

    Turmoil at DataRobot

    DataRobot markets a top-notch product, and employs hundreds of talented and capable people, many of whom I think of as…

    36 条评论
  • Retirement? No.

    Retirement? No.

    Earlier this year, I turned 65. Instantly, AARP sent me junk mail.

    17 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了