AI Regulatory Compliance Readiness for Funds
George Ralph CITP
Global Managing Director & CRO @RFA, Leader, Investor, Techie, Cyber Fanatic, Speaker - CITP / Cyber / GDPR
AI has been a crucial technology that several businesses, including financial firms, have adopted in their everyday operations. The integration of AI into the operations of financial firms like funds has helped boost their effectiveness in detecting fraud, market analysis, portfolio optimization, and several other use cases. Despite these many benefits, one of the challenges that funds face when using AI is regulatory compliance.
?
For instance, the GDPR requires all funds in the EU to utilize AI without violating any user privacy regulations it put in place. This can be challenging given the huge amount of data (which may include user information) that is needed to make these AI systems useful. In today’s discussion, I will discuss how funds can prepare for such regulations to ensure they don’t face penalties for non-compliance. I will start this discussion with why funds must prioritize compliance.
?
Why AI Readiness Matters for Financial Institutions
AI readiness goes beyond just meeting regulations—it positions financial institutions for success in a competitive and tech-driven market. Here’s why AI readiness is crucial for funds and other financial firms:
?
The Five Pillars of AI Readiness
To navigate the complexities of AI compliance, firms need to focus on these five core areas. Let’s explore each of them in detail:
?
1.Understanding Regulatory Requirements
Funds should start by understanding the AI usage requirements of the regulators in the regions they operate. Financial firms must stay informed about AI regulations like the EU AI Act, which categorizes AI systems by risk levels. A solid grasp of these frameworks ensures firms can align their AI strategies with compliance needs. Remember, regulations vary based on the region. For instance, the requirements in the EU might be different from those in a region like China or the US.
?
Action Step: Establish a team or hire experts dedicated to monitoring AI-related policy updates and translating them into actionable insights for leadership and teams in the fund. This team should always research all the regulations related to the use of AI in the regions where the fund currently operates, as well as those it plans to expand to in the near future.
?
2.Leadership Sponsorship
The leadership of any organization, including funds, is crucial to all decisions made, including those that affect how AI is utilized. Having a clear leadership structure is vital for AI readiness. Assigning sponsorship to an executive ensures streamlined decision-making and accountability. Without leadership buy-in, readiness efforts can become fragmented, leading to inefficiencies and non-compliance with relevant regulations.
?
Action Step: Funds must designate a Chief AI Officer or equivalent to oversee compliance strategies and bridge the gap between regulatory requirements and operational practices. The AI officer should have an in-depth understanding of AI technologies and a bit of a legal background to align this knowledge with compliance requirements. Funds should also establish a team (internal or external) that the officer can work with to achieve the goals for AI regulatory compliance.
?
3.Defining Responsibilities
In addition to having clear leadership for AI, teams within firms also play a role in AI regulatory compliance. Therefore, funds must allocate responsibilities clearly across teams to avoid duplication of efforts or missed compliance steps. This includes integrating compliance into existing workflows and holding teams accountable for readiness tasks. Assigning responsibilities should be led by the AI team, headed by the Chief AI Officer.
?
Action Step: Use readiness checklists and cross-functional meetings to ensure every team understands its role in compliance. It is also crucial to ensure that all teams are aware of the risks of not complying with AI regulations and how exactly they must utilize AI to stay in line with the requirements of regulators.
?
4.Building or Adapting AI Governance
Governance frameworks are essential blueprints that guide all phases of using AI systems, including development, deployment, and ongoing monitoring. These frameworks are critical in ensuring that AI technologies are not only safe and effective but also ethically sound and compliant with necessary legal standards. For firms starting from scratch, creating a coherent governance strategy is essential to maintain consistency and meet compliance standards.
?
Action Step: Invest in tools that enable centralized tracking of AI systems and their compliance status. The good news is that several advanced tools, powered by AI, can monitor systems to ensure they comply with all relevant regulations. Dataiku is one of the popular platforms used by developers of AI tools to ensure compliance. Other platforms that can monitor deployed AI systems for compliance include AI Fairness 360 (IBM), Microsoft Fairness Toolkit (Fairlearn), and Google’s What-If Tool.
?
5.Establishing Technical Foundations
A robust technical framework is essential for AI readiness, ensuring compliance, and managing risks. This involves maintaining asset awareness by cataloging all AI assets (data, models, infrastructure, and teams), tracking the usage of generative AI to prevent misuse, and systematically qualifying AI projects based on their risk levels.
?
Action Step: Organizations put in place a framework for conducting a thorough inventory of AI assets, including data sources and models, and use advanced platforms to manage high-risk systems. These platforms automate risk assessments, track compliance with regulations, monitor model performance, and enforce governance policies to ensure that AI systems align with legal and ethical standards while minimizing operational risks.
?
Challenges for AI Regulatory Compliance Readiness
Despite understanding the importance and benefits of being prepared for AI, funds still encounter several challenges in achieving this. These challenges include:
?
Model Transparency and Explainability
Financial institutions are required to provide explanations for the decisions made by their models, particularly in highly regulated areas like trading, lending, or risk management. Many AI models, especially deep learning models, are often seen as "black boxes," making it difficult to interpret how they arrive at decisions. However, regulators require clear documentation of AI processes, model behaviors, and decision-making logic to ensure transparency and fairness.
?
Bias and Fairness
Financial institutions must avoid bias in AI models, which could result in unfair or discriminatory decisions. For example, an AI-driven trading algorithm or credit scoring system might unintentionally favor one group over another due to biased training data. Compliance regulations, such as the Fair Lending Act in the U.S., require that models do not perpetuate discrimination or unjust practices. Ensuring fairness and mitigating bias in AI models is both a regulatory and ethical challenge funds using AI must address.
?
Regulatory Uncertainty
AI regulations are still evolving, and many countries have not yet fully addressed the compliance challenges associated with the use of AI in the financial sector. Generative AI, in particular, is a relatively new technology, and many regulators are still figuring out how to oversee its usage. Funds may struggle to keep up with the new and evolving regulations, which can vary widely by jurisdiction. This uncertainty can make it difficult to know how to align AI operations with legal and regulatory requirements.
?
Third-party AI Providers
Many funds rely on third-party AI solution providers, which introduces another layer of complexity regarding compliance. Funds need to ensure that the third-party AI providers are also adhering to the same regulatory standards and that contracts and agreements clearly outline responsibilities for compliance and data protection. That’s why funds must do a thorough analysis before choosing the AI providers to use.
Operational Readiness
Funds must ensure that their teams, systems, and processes are prepared to integrate AI into their operations in a way that complies with regulations. This includes establishing governance frameworks, conducting staff training on AI compliance, and integrating AI systems with existing regulatory reporting and monitoring mechanisms.
?
Key Takeaway
For funds using AI in their operations, ensuring regulatory compliance is essential to avoid penalties and maintain operational integrity. AI readiness not only helps funds meet legal requirements but also boosts effectiveness in risk management, decision-making, and investor confidence.
?
To achieve compliance, funds must focus on understanding regulatory requirements, restructuring their leadership to include AI executives, defining team responsibilities, creating governance frameworks, and establishing technical foundations. Yes, implementing these steps can be challenging and costly, but it is a necessary step that funds must take to ensure they can safely utilize AI solutions for the benefit of all their stakeholders.
?
?
?