An AI Paradox: AI Dissecting Its Own Creations
Gerry Aclag
Accomplished IT professional with 15+ years track record of successful IT Management in the Asian region * Certified Agile Service Manager? * IT Infrastructure, Service Management Expert * Singaporean
Have you noticed this latest trend in the AI bonanza? People are now using AI to discredit AI, all while trying to profit from it. I’m talking about so-called “AI content detectors.”
The idea behind these tools is that social media content is becoming so automated that most posts aren’t even written by humans anymore. To stand out, the thinking goes, you need to create content that won’t be flagged by these so-called AI detectors as AI-generated. Enter AI agents that claim to detect AI-written content and “humanize” it to sound more natural.
Naturally, my curiosity got the better of me, so I decided to run some tests. Some of these AI detectors offer free features where you can paste or upload text, and after a few minutes, they’ll tell you if the text was AI-generated.
First, I looked at popular posts on X (the one we knew as Twitter). Around 7 out of 10 posts were flagged as over 95% AI-generated. Then, I checked out longer pieces—book reviews from prominent Goodreads and Amazon book reviewers. Almost all were flagged as 96% to 98% AI-generated.
This didn’t seem right to me. Could it really be true?
So, I conducted an acid test: I wrote a piece of text myself, without any AI assistance, and submitted it to the same AI detector.
And guess what? The detector claimed my original text was 97% AI-generated! What a joke!
(Here’s a screenshot of that session, with any identifying details of the company blurred out for privacy.)
There you have it. I’m not saying we should completely dismiss these tools, but here’s what I really think: If using AI helps me deliver quality results quickly and exceed my KPIs, frees me from routine tasks, and gives me more time for high-value goals and personal and family life, I’m not going to let these so-called experts distract me or make money off of me.
So… should I start worrying that my friends might begin to doubt my writing (hopefully not my verbal communication!) because it turns out I’m only 3% human and 97% AI?
ROFL.
But, jokes aside, this is part of a technology that is reshaping so much of what we do—things that affect our productivity, our knowledge, and our future. It’s still in its early stages, and it’s going to be with us for the foreseeable future.
So, how should we deal with this? Here are a few practical tips:
Let me know what you think.
Leader. Visionary. Strategist. Leadership Learning and Change Management Expertise. Let's Connect!
5 个月Hello Gerry, Thank you for sharing this insight! I agree 100%! I have often thought of this probability as employers, professors/teachers, and others continue introduce and heavily rely on these AI detection tools to question and, so often falsely label and discard people’s authentic expression. Your personal experiment (and mine as well) have proven the systems’ FLAWS are more prevalent than we imagine. Lesson: How do we help users continue to engage their human eyes, ears, and common sense, to analyze people’s communications? After all, AI is, in fact, learning from human communications; Hence, it’s key to remember all effective communication did not begin nor will it end, with the use of AI. If we don’t get this “analysis/evaluation” process right, we will sacrifice human quality, depth, and substance, and will breed speed, hollowness, and laziness. Lack of clear vision and strategy for how to understand and when to use these tools, will cost us competitive advantage, tremendous talent, and will erode human genius. Or, is it too late?
--
6 个月Good advice. Thanks ??