AI Now

AI Now

Sitting in the audience of IBM’s excellent AI / IoT seminar this week, it occurred to me that AI has been talked about for a really long time, has been anticipated as ‘almost here’ for some years, and is upon us in a rush. In other words, it is following the usual path of technological development and adoption.

I like to refer to the three phases as:

1.   I dreamed

2.   I waited

3.   I blinked

Of the thousands of articles about Artificial Intelligence (AI) that have crossed my path over the last few years, I have read several dozen (some were very short), since it is a subject close to my heart, for several reasons.

My first serious look at the subject was more than 30 years ago when, as an undergraduate, I wrote a paper about the development and likely implementation of what were then called ‘Expert Systems’. The mainstream concept then was that you codified (literally) the expertise of leading professionals in a subject area (e.g.: property law, accounting), to develop what was, in essence, an interactive reference resource that a non-expert could reliably use, in place of that expert. Because the research at the time focused on replacing regulated or mission-critical professions, nothing much happened.   

In the paper, I suggested that these ‘Expert Systems’ would be developed into powerful self-directed (not just interactive) databases that a qualified professional could use as a research / development tool, or a suitably-trained senior manager could use to replace routine tasks that require little professional input. My worked examples were producing legal documents and automating basic accounting, probably because these were subject I had studied and was familiar with. In both cases, replacing several junior staff, hugely increasing the productivity of senior professionals, was the outcome I envisioned.

Having been wrong for 30 years, I may be about to be right.

So, how did we get here, and where is AI going?  

Well, let’s define ‘here’.

Expert Systems are among us. A good example is Zegal (the contract generator formerly known as Dragon Law). In client-facing Expert Systems, it is important that the user is not able to change the output (in this case, a contract), except through guided decision-making, or it’s no longer ‘Expert’.

Machine learning is growing by leaps and bounds, so it’s important to understand what this is (and is not). Basically, Machine Learning refers to a system’s ability to adjust responses in response to information, rather than have to be explicitly programmed (as is the case for Expert Systems). Amazon’s ‘Recommended for You’ function, Uber’s timing alerts, and Siri are well-known examples. The key difference between Machine Learning and Expert Systems is that the latter is fixed, and the former is responsive to data.

Chatbots and Virtual Assistants (currently focused on appointment setting) are great examples of Artificial Intelligence. AI enables natural language interaction, with responses based on semantic rather than simple key word identification. This is important, because meaningfulness of customer interaction, which drives engagement, which drives satisfaction. Because AI is that step ahead of Machine Learning, AI agents can seem almost human (the Virtual Assistant Evie is occasionally asked to attend events, and sent gifts).

The concept of a machine-human entity (AKA Cyborg) has focused on the physical, but it is here in the virtual world, as many human agents are AI-assisted, with information and suggested responses being served to them by the AI agent. The next time someone has a complex answer ready for you in a suspiciously short time, you will know you are dealing with a Virtual Cyborg.

So what is the future of AI?

I will come back to this in a future article, but a strong current trend is for companies to differentiate between high-volume and high-touch contacts, to automate the former and AI-support the latter. As this requires far more data than is currently collected, expect organisations to convert even phone conversations to data…but that’s a whole new conversation.




Jon Lake

GreenTV Short "Untold Story Videos from All Over"!

6 年

Clive, I am going on 24-years with GreenTV, feel like it is time to be right in green industry yet also created WorldThinkTank which will eventually come out for true world thinkers. Look forward to net AI thoughts, post/s..

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Clive Wright的更多文章

  • The Bridge

    The Bridge

    Definition There are a number of definitions of The Valley of Death (also known as the Death Valley Curve), but this is…

    17 条评论
  • Writing is Reading

    Writing is Reading

    The rules of grammar are set out in guides, spelling is set out in dictionaries, but how do you learn the craft of…

    6 条评论
  • Words Matter

    Words Matter

    Words Matter Communication, meaning, and word choice are fairly common topics of discussion in our household –…

  • Groundhog Day

    Groundhog Day

    A friend sent me this photo from Groundhog Day, the 1993 comedy starring Bill Murray and Andie MacDowel, when we got…

    4 条评论
  • WFH or WAH

    WFH or WAH

    At various points in my working life, I have Worked From Home. I have done this enough to have a routine that works…

    2 条评论
  • It's OK to swear

    It's OK to swear

    It's OK to swear - if you are LinkedIn. Social media platforms have recently been under fire for failing to curb…

    6 条评论
  • LinkedIn Growth Hacks

    LinkedIn Growth Hacks

    Having tripled my LinkedIn network in six months (don’t get too excited – it’s not a massive number), I decided to…

    1 条评论
  • What is Performance, and how do you Measure it?

    What is Performance, and how do you Measure it?

    I was reminded of the difficulty of defining and measuring work performance objectively, by a conversation about…

    3 条评论
  • Networking Basics

    Networking Basics

    Especially for B2B businesses, attending networking events is probably the best way to build your business and…

    5 条评论
  • Digital is not the only Marketing

    Digital is not the only Marketing

    Drucker claims a business can function effectively with everything outsourced - except Innovation and Marketing. Since…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了