Is AI the Key to Regulatory Compliance? Daniel Smith ??

In the 11th edition of the JCR Journal, we speak to Daniel Smith, FICA about the impact of AI in the Regulatory Compliance world.

Having worked in the FX space for 10 years, Daniel is a Chief Compliance Officer responsible for driving regulatory excellence & risk mitigation. All of Daniel's thoughts and opinions below are his own.

In today's rapidly evolving regulatory landscape, organisations are increasingly turning to Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a potential solution to manage compliance efficiently. While AI has found success in areas like Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML), its application in broader regulatory compliance presents its own unique challenges. As someone who has experienced failure and success in implementing AI solutions for regulatory compliance, I have gained some valuable insights into the practical difficulties and potential rewards that organisations might see.

This article delves into the effects AI has had on regulatory compliance beyond KYC and AML, its benefits and drawbacks, the impact on team structures, changes in audits, and key considerations for those looking to leverage AI in this critical area.

The Current Impact of AI on Regulatory Compliance

AI has undoubtedly made significant inroads into specific compliance areas like KYC and AML, where it excels at pattern recognition and anomaly detection. However, when it comes to broader regulatory compliance, the challenges are more far more complex.

Regulations often involve nuanced interpretations, contextual understanding, and the need to adapt to changing legal environments.

In my experience, the initial attraction to AI was its potential to streamline compliance processes across all regulatory requirements, not just KYC and AML. We envisioned a system that could automatically update itself with new regulations, interpret their implications, and assist in policy change along with adjusting our compliance strategies. AI seemed like the perfect solution to handle the increasing volume and complexity of regulatory demands in areas such as conduct of business standards, client money and asset rules (CASS), and the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR).

The Main Benefits of AI in Compliance ?

• Ensuring Firm-wide Compliance: AI systems can help ensure that a firm remains compliant by consistently applying regulatory requirements across all departments and business units. By automating the interpretation and implementation of complex regulations, AI reduces the risk of human error and ensures uniform compliance practices throughout the organisation.
• Proactive Horizon Scanning: AI can monitor regulatory bodies, legal updates, and industry news in real-time, providing proactive horizon scanning for upcoming regulatory changes. This enables organisations to anticipate and prepare for new regulations before they come into effect, ensuring they remain ahead of compliance obligations.
• Regulatory Interpretation for Diverse Business Models: AI can be trained to interpret regulations in the context of different business models. This is particularly beneficial for organisations with varied operations, as AI can adapt compliance strategies to suit specific business needs while still adhering to regulatory standards.
• Efficiency and Automation: AI can automate repetitive tasks such as monitoring regulatory updates, data collection, and compliance reporting. This not only frees up human resources for more strategic activities but also increases the speed and accuracy of compliance processes.
• Advanced Data Analysis: AI systems can process and analyse large datasets quickly, identifying trends and inconsistencies that might indicate compliance issues across various regulatory domains. This capability enhances the organisations ability to detect and address potential risks promptly.
• Real-time Monitoring and Alerts: With AI, organisations can achieve continuous compliance monitoring rather than periodic checks. AI can provide real-time alerts for any deviations from compliance standards, allowing for immediate detection and response to potential violations.
• Predictive Insights: AI can utilise historical data to predict future compliance risks, enabling proactive measures. By forecasting potential issues, organisations can implement strategies to mitigate risks before they materialise, helping them stay ahead of regulatory changes.
• Enhanced Decision-Making: AI can offer valuable insights that support decision-making in compliance. By analysing complex regulatory information and organisational data, AI helps compliance officers make informed decisions that align with both regulatory requirements and business objectives.

In theory, these benefits present a compelling case for AI adoption in regulatory compliance beyond KYC and AML. AIs ability to ensure firm-wide compliance, proactively scan the regulatory horizon, and interpret regulations across differing business models can significantly enhance an organisations compliance framework. However, practical implementation is fraught with challenges that can undermine these advantages.

Potential Drawbacks and Challenges of AI in Regulatory Compliance ?

• Data Quality and Relevance: AI systems rely heavily on the data they are trained on. In my case, the AI was trained on an incorrect dataset that did not accurately represent our regulatory environment. This led to erroneous interpretations and compliance recommendations that were not only unhelpful but potentially harmful.
• Lack of Nuance in Regulation Interpretation: Regulations are often nuanced and require contextual understanding. Our AI system initially struggled to grasp the subtleties of an outcomes-based regulatory environment, where the focus is on achieving specific results rather than following prescribed processes. Unlike KYC and AML, which have more defined parameters, broader regulatory compliance involves subjective interpretation that AI may find challenging.
• Complexity of Regulations: Regulations can vary widely across jurisdictions and industries, making it difficult for AI systems to generalise compliance strategies. This complexity is less pronounced in areas like KYC and AML, where standardised international guidelines exist.
• Black Box Problem: AI algorithms can be opaque, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at certain decisions. This lack of transparency is problematic when organisations need to justify their compliance strategies to regulators who demand clear explanations.
• Over-reliance on Automation: There is a risk of becoming too dependent on AI, leading to complacency in human oversight. In our experience, initial trust in the AIs capabilities could have led to reduced scrutiny, allowing errors to go unnoticed until it was too late.
• Regulatory Uncertainty: AI technologies themselves may fall under regulatory scrutiny. Compliance teams must ensure that their use of AI adheres to laws concerning data privacy, algorithmic accountability, and more. This adds another layer of complexity when applying AI to regulatory compliance beyond KYC and AML.

Learning from Failure to Achieve Success

Despite the initial setbacks, we did not abandon the pursuit of integrating AI into our compliance processes. Instead, we took the lessons learned from our failure to refine our approach. Recognising the importance of accurate data and the need for a solution tailored to our specific regulatory environment, we developed a better scope and requirements specification for vendor selection. This involved collaborating closely with the vendor’s regulatory experts to ensure that any potential AI solution would meet our unique compliance needs.

We also focused on the AI model’s ability to interpret the nuances of outcomes-based regulations. This involved ensuring that their rule-based algorithms ran alongside machine learning to ensure that the AI could both learn from data and apply specific regulatory rules where necessary. By enhancing transparency and maintaining robust human oversight, we’ve developed a hybrid system that effectively supports our compliance efforts.

The result was a solution that not only works for our business but has also enhanced our ability to navigate complex regulatory requirements confidently. This experience underscored the value of persistence, adaptability, and continuous learning in successfully implementing AI for regulatory compliance beyond the more straightforward applications in KYC and AML.

Impact on Team Structure and Headcount

The integration of AI into compliance functions inevitably affects team dynamics and staffing. Initially, we anticipated that AI would reduce the need for manual data analysis, potentially impacting future headcount. However, the reality was more complex. The failure and subsequent success of our AI system highlighted the need for skilled professionals who understand both the regulatory landscape and the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies.

Rather than reducing staff, we’ve invested in training employees to work effectively alongside new AI tools. New roles are likely to emerge, such as AI compliance analysts who specialise in interpreting AI outputs and ensuring their alignment with regulatory requirements and can assist the model in leaning. This will lead to a more dynamic and skilled compliance team that leverages technology without compromising human expertise.

Evolution of Audits with AI

AI has the potential to transform auditing processes by enabling continuous monitoring and real-time data analysis. With our refined AI solution, we have improved our audit readiness. The system provides transparent and traceable outputs, which auditors can review and assess with confidence.

Auditors, in the main, are initially sceptical of AI-generated compliance reports but will come to appreciate the enhanced accuracy and efficiency that AI brings when coupled with human oversight. Organisations need to be prepared to demonstrate how their AI systems work and provide evidence of their reliability. This involves maintaining detailed documentation and ensuring that the AIs decision-making processes are as transparent as possible.

Key Considerations for Implementing AI in Regulatory Compliance

Based on my experience, here are three critical considerations for organisations looking to utilise AI for regulatory compliance beyond KYC and AML:

• Data Integrity and Relevance: Ensure that the AI is trained on accurate, comprehensive, and relevant datasets that cover the full spectrum of regulatory requirements pertinent to your organisation. Collaborate with regulatory experts to select and validate appropriate training data.
• Understanding Regulatory Nuances: AI systems need to be designed to interpret the complexities and subtleties of various regulations. Consider developing customised AI models or hybrid approaches that combine AI with rule-based systems and human expertise to capture the full spectrum of regulatory requirements.
• Maintaining Human Oversight: Do not underestimate the importance of human judgement in regulatory compliance. AI should augment and not replace human decision-making. Establishing processes for regular human review of AI outputs and to ensure that compliance teams are equipped to question and interpret AI-generated insights is vital.

Conclusion

My experience is applying AI to regulatory compliance beyond well-established areas like KYC and AML is considerably more challenging than you might think. Regulations outside these domains often involve greater complexity and require nuanced interpretation that AI may not readily be equipped to provide. My journey from initial failure to eventual success underscores the importance of approaching AI implementation with caution, recognising its limitations, and integrating it thoughtfully into existing compliance frameworks.

Organisations must prioritise data quality, understand the limitations of AI in interpreting regulatory nuances, and maintain robust human oversight. By doing so, they can harness the benefits of AI while mitigating risks, ultimately enhancing their ability to navigate the complex world of regulatory compliance.

Note: Implementing AI in regulatory compliance is a journey filled with lessons. Failure, while challenging, provides invaluable insights that can guide future efforts. By learning from setbacks and persevering, organisations can find solutions that not only work but also significantly enhance their compliance capabilities. Sharing these experiences helps others prepare for the challenges ahead and make more informed decisions about integrating AI into their compliance strategies, especially in areas where its application is more complex

A huge thank you to Daniel for his insight into the impact of AI in Regulatory Compliance??

If you'd like to get involved in future editions of the JCR Journal, feel free to DM or email [email protected] ??

Want to find out more about JCR Talent ? Check us out here ??