AI' Jurisprudence

Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing at a breakneck speed, with each new version being tenfold more potent than the previous. It is now evident that artificial intelligence (AI) is far more than just another new technology; rather, it is a revolutionary instrument with the potential to drastically alter how people live and work.

In the contemporary era, AI-driven corporate sectors' convergent manifestations are Ubiquitous. The inception of this convergence will unleash a new cascade of criminal activities including fraud, data privacy violations, intellectual property theft, environmental damage, market manipulation, bias, and accounting manipulation. This lays bare the constraints in the existing juridical infrastructure in our Country and proposes a comprehensive legal framework, especially for AI-specific criminal liability.

This includes AI-specific criminal offenses, AI-driven forensic accounting, AI-powered regulatory oversight, human rights-centric AI development, and corporate governance reforms.

This stoutly urges the clarion call for action from policymakers, scholars, and practitioners to confront the threats posed by AI-driven corporate criminality. This explores the Comparative analysis of foreign jurisprudence. AI systems are created by humans, and their actions are determined by their programming and data. While AI can process vast amounts of information and make decisions faster than humans, it is not inherently capable of criminal behavior. That being said, AI systems can be used in ways that violate laws and regulations or perpetuate harmful practices.         

For instance, AI can spread disinformation or propaganda, engage in fraud or financial manipulation, violate privacy or data protection laws, and Perpetuate biases and discrimination. Corporations and organizations need to ensure that their AI systems are designed and deployed responsibly, with appropriate safeguards and ethical guidelines in place.