AI in Job Hunting: Benefits, Drawbacks & Essential Strategies for Job Seekers (and an Invitation to Participate in an Important Study)
Crystal Lay
Global Employer Branding & I/O Psych Executive ? Chief Executive @ GBS & EB @ Zoom, NW ? MBA, MSc IOP Candidate ? Speaker, Writer ? #Neurodivergence Researcher ? Board Member, Freddie Ford, SSD PAC ? APA, SIOP, AIVA
These days, it’s almost impossible to ignore the influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI). From the tools embedded in our email platforms to the assistants in our mobile apps, AI has woven itself into the fabric of our daily work lives. But what does this mean for those navigating the job market? For job seekers, especially, AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT , Grammarly , and LinkedIn ’s AI tools are becoming key allies—and occasionally, unexpected obstacles—in the hunt for meaningful employment, often without users even realizing they’re relying on it.
How Job Seekers Are Using AI
People are increasingly turning to AI-driven platforms or features within platforms to improve their application materials, communicate more effectively, and even find jobs that better match their skills and experience. Platforms like Microsoft Copilot and 谷歌 Gemini help people polish resumes, write cover letters, and understand the nuances of job descriptions. Moreover, LinkedIn’s AI tools, like writing suggestions for profile updates and tailored job recommendations, are reshaping how people present themselves professionally. Zoom 's AI Companion even has prompts designed into the UI to help users mindfully improve their writing style and tone.
Consider a candidate updating their LinkedIn profile. Using AI-driven prompts, they can quickly enhance their headline, rewrite their work experience, and even get tips on how to tailor their language for different industries. Grammarly helps polish their written materials, while ChatGPT drafts compelling cover letters and resume bullets in seconds. The time savings alone is game-changing, and it’s not surprising that nearly 70% of job seekers have used some form of AI to support their job applications in 2024 (Business Insider ).
For those interested in using AI for tasks like these, here are some useful prompts:
Tip: If your AI tool allows, consider uploading your resume as a PDF to provide context, though be clear that you’re using it to offer background, not as a formatting guide.
Tip: By aligning your experience with the job description, AI can help highlight where your skills and accomplishments match the role. LinkedIn’s career coach (in beta) offers similar support, though its matching accuracy is still evolving and sometimes misses the mark.
The Unique Potential of AI for Neurodivergent Job Seekers
For many neurodivergent individuals—such as those with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), ADHD, dyslexia, and dyspraxia—AI has the potential to make the job search more manageable. These individuals often face challenges in processing and organizing information, structuring content, and decoding the “unwritten rules” of job applications and interviews. AI tools can offer a kind of scaffolding, simplifying tasks that might otherwise feel overwhelming.
For example, individuals with ADHD, who may struggle with task organization and follow-through, can use AI tools to break down job descriptions into specific requirements, organize resume content, or create step-by-step action plans for applications. Tools like ChatGPT can help job seekers with ASD prepare for interview questions by simulating different scenarios, allowing them to practice in a low-stakes environment. For those with dyslexia, Grammarly’s advanced spell-check and grammar tools can ensure their written materials reflect their skills without minor spelling errors overshadowing them. And for individuals with dyspraxia, which can affect motor skills and coordination, AI can automate repetitive tasks like formatting a resume, saving time and reducing stress.
These tools are not just about saving time; they can reduce the cognitive load associated with job applications, which is particularly beneficial for those who may struggle with executive functioning. Research shows that neurodivergent individuals often experience heightened cognitive demands during the job search process, leading to stress and anxiety. AI tools can alleviate some of this burden by handling repetitive tasks, organizing complex information, and even providing clear, structured prompts for tasks that may otherwise feel ambiguous (CIPD, 2024 ).
Let's take a look at how the prompts for each of the examples shared could be structured:
Tip: By sharing the ADHD diagnosis in the prompt, you’re guiding the AI to reduce cognitive load while maintaining effectiveness.
Tip: Stating your diagnosis encourages AI to offer structured responses, clear transitions, and concise examples that align with communication needs. Sharing what you see as your strengths and weaknesses in the areas of information processing, task completion, social cues and communication will help AI and LLMs offer you better guidance.
Tip: By framing ChatGPT’s role in this way, you increase the likelihood of receiving simplified language that focuses on clarity and accessibility, which can be particularly useful for neurodivergent individuals or those with language processing challenges.
Tip: For dyspraxia, asking ChatGPT to act as an Occupational Therapist (OT) or a Learning Support Specialist are the most beneficial options. Professionals in these roles are trained to help individuals with motor planning, organizational challenges, and practical strategies for breaking down complex tasks into manageable steps—areas where individuals with dyspraxia often benefit from additional support.
The Psychological Impact of AI in Job Seeking: A Double-Edged Sword
While AI promises efficiency and support, it’s essential to acknowledge the potential psychological implications of using these tools. AI can bolster self-confidence, especially for those who struggle with articulating their achievements or navigating complex job descriptions. Neurodivergent job seekers—who represent between 20% - 50% of the workforce (depending on the study you reference)—can benefit significantly from AI tools that provide structure and clarity, reducing stress and making the job search feel more manageable when utilized properly.
However, there’s a flip side. New tools have a learning curve, increasing cognitive load. Heavy reliance on AI can sometimes lead to reduced confidence in one’s abilities. An emerging concern is that job seekers may feel “less authentic” or worry that their materials no longer fully represent them. This is particularly pronounced when AI-generated content feels noticeably polished against prior work, creating a gap between the candidate's "real" voice and the AI-enhanced version.
For many, this process can lead to cognitive dissonance—the discomfort of holding conflicting beliefs. They want their materials to be perfect, yet feel uneasy about not owning every word. Some even worry that if AI tools influence recruiters’ decisions more than human intuition, candidates might be “screened out” by algorithms that favor polished over authentic profiles. And, of course, this raises an important question:
Does AI Level the Playing Field, or Simply Deepen Inequities?
The promise of AI in job seeking has long been its potential to reduce human biases in hiring. By evaluating candidates based on hard skills and keywords rather than subjective judgments, AI-driven systems theoretically create a more level playing field. However, like all tech solutions, AI is only as "fair" as the data it’s trained on. These systems require human oversight for compliance and ethical alignment to protect job seekers and uphold brand equity. Bias in AI systems has been widely documented; for example, Amazon’s now-infamous recruitment tool reportedly discriminated against female candidates, a stark reminder of how easily AI can inherit and perpetuate biases (Reuters, 2018 ).
For neurodivergent job seekers and other marginalized groups, this bias is a significant concern, if not a clear and present danger. Imagine a candidate with an unconventional resume or an employment gap due to health issues. Will AI tools evaluate these factors fairly, or will they automatically reduce their chances based on historical hiring patterns? These are the questions I’m exploring in my current research on how AI impacts the job search experience for neurodivergent job seekers.
Please Help: Participate in Research That Can Shape the Future of AI in Recruitment
If you’re a job seeker who has used AI tools or Large Language Models (LLMs) in your job search in the past year, I invite and encourage you to share your experiences in my research study. Your feedback will be instrumental in understanding the impact of AI on employment and shaping recommendations for a more inclusive future. This is a brief, anonymous survey—just 5-10 minutes—and your voice can help AI becomes a force for positive change in employment. The survey is open for the next two weeks, and results will be published in early spring 2025.
Let’s work together to build a recruitment landscape that values diversity, equity, and inclusive benefit for all. Thank you.
If you have questions about the study, please feel free to email me at [email protected] .
Global Employer Branding & I/O Psych Executive ? Chief Executive @ GBS & EB @ Zoom, NW ? MBA, MSc IOP Candidate ? Speaker, Writer ? #Neurodivergence Researcher ? Board Member, Freddie Ford, SSD PAC ? APA, SIOP, AIVA
2 周Thank you, Sarah White!
Cooking Software as a Service for lazy people, AI sauce, spicy idea.
2 周Crystal Lay, aI brings opportunities and risks for job-hunting.