AI in Higher Education Education: A Guide to University Policies and Practices
Joe Sabado, MBA
Aspires to be an Exemplar of a Purpose-Driven, Inspirational, and Compassionate (EPIC) Leader. My posts are my own and do not represent my employer.
This resource compiles information on integrating generative AI tools into education. It includes links to university policies, syllabus statements, articles, and frameworks discussing AI use in courses, assessments, and academic work. The summaries cover topics such as acceptable AI usage, citation requirements, ethical considerations, data privacy, and the development of effective AI policies. Overall, it provides a broad overview of how different institutions are addressing AI's role in education.
Language to Support Course/Assessment policies on Students’ Use of Generative AI Tools?
Summary: Instructors determine acceptable generative AI tool usage, which varies by course and assignment.? When permitted, students must cite all AI-generated content using in-text citations and a final "Sourced Tool" list.? AI tools are never allowed on exams.
Sample Syllabus Statements for the Use of AI Tools in Your Course
Summary: This syllabus statement clarifies acceptable and unacceptable uses of AI tools in coursework.? AI can be used for brainstorming and research but not for completing assignments or impersonating students.? Unauthorized AI use will result in penalties as defined by the instructor and university policy.
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Usage, Policies, and Resources
Summary: Notre Dame provides faculty and staff with access to generative AI tools, including Google Gemini and Magai, but users must verify outputs for accuracy.? Workshops are offered to train users on responsible AI tool usage.? Using AI-generated work as one's own is considered academic dishonesty and violates the Honor Code.
University of Sydney AI assessment policy
Summary: The University of Sydney is implementing a new AI assessment policy starting Semester 1, 2025, allowing AI use in assessments except for exams and in-semester tests, while promoting responsible and ethical AI integration in education. A "two-lane approach" will be introduced in Semester 2, combining secure in-person assessments with open assessments that encourage the use of relevant tools, ensuring students are prepared for modern workplaces. The university is also providing training, resources, and tools like Cogniti, an AI assistant, to support students and staff in using generative AI effectively and equitably.
Colorado State University - What should a syllabus statement on AI look like?
Summary: Syllabi must explicitly prohibit AI use in assignments unless instructors authorize and guide its application.? Clear guidelines on acceptable AI use are essential for academic integrity.? Ignoring AI's impact on academic work is a failure of instructors' responsibilities.
Data Privacy Regulations and Compliance for Educational Institutions
Summary: Educational institutions must comply with data privacy regulations like GDPR and FERPA to protect student data.? These laws govern data collection, processing, and disclosure, requiring robust security measures and compliance strategies.? Understanding and implementing these regulations is crucial for maintaining student trust and a secure learning environment.
The Best AI Syllabus Policies I've Seen So Far
Summary: This article summarizes effective AI syllabus policies for educators, offering curated examples and explanations of acceptable and unacceptable AI use.? It stresses the importance of clarity, ethical considerations, and adaptable policies to address the evolving role of AI in education.? The provided policies range from permissive to restrictive, emphasizing independent learning and responsible AI tool usage.
AI Syllabi Policies - A Look at the Collection
Summary: Colleges cautiously embrace AI in education, prioritizing transparency and student disclosure of AI tool use.? Policies emphasize AI literacy and academic integrity while acknowledging disciplinary differences in approach.? Eaton's "AI + Education = Simplified" resource offers accessible AI syllabi and policies under a Creative Commons license.
Penn State University - Syllabus Statements
Summary: Instructors may permit generative AI tool use for some assignments, but not for exams.? If permitted, students must cite all AI-generated content, including rewording and paraphrasing.? Prohibited uses may include creating content or completing assessments.
CSU Chico - ChatGPT Edu Frequently Asked Questions?
Summary: Chico State provides free ChatGPT Edu access to students and staff starting February 11, 2025.? This includes GPT-4 and enhanced security features through an 18-month contract.? System-wide access for 500,000 students and employees is ensured via an OpenAI enterprise agreement.
AI Governance in Higher Education: Case Studies of Guidance at Big Ten Universities
Summary: This study analyzed AI governance strategies in 14 Big Ten universities, revealing three key characteristics: multi-unit, role-specific, and academic-focused guidelines.? The multi-unit approach, while comprehensive, created accessibility challenges.? Future research should incorporate broader perspectives and quantitative methods to improve understanding and impact.
Assessing the Guidelines on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Universities: A Survey of the World’s Top 50 Universities?
Summary: Most top universities permit generative AI use in education but require responsible practices, including instructor approval and proper attribution.? Existing guidelines often lack detail on AI algorithms and comprehensive ethical considerations, highlighting a need for improved policies and increased AI literacy.? A recent study analyzed university guidelines on generative AI, revealing widespread adoption but significant gaps in addressing ethical concerns and practical implementation.
How to create a higher education AI policy
Summary: A university AI policy should govern internal AI use, resource allocation, and ethical considerations.? Its development requires stakeholder input and analysis of current practices and future needs.? The final policy must ensure legal compliance and adaptability to evolving AI technologies.
AI Course Policies and Assignment Guidelines
Summary: University policy forbids unauthorized AI use, demanding proper attribution.? Course syllabi should explicitly define acceptable AI usage and promote ethical practices.? Resources are available to assist instructors in developing clear policies and educating students about responsible AI implementation.
Establishing Transparency Boundaries in AI Adoption: Responsible Use and Student Awareness
Summary: Krisztina Domjan's research examined responsible AI tool use in academic writing, revealing strong policy awareness but weaknesses in citation and rubric application.? The study highlights the need for improved AI literacy training and clearer guidelines for students.? Recommendations include transparent AI integration and enhanced faculty support to promote ethical AI use.
Lance Eaton's Getting to an AI Policy Part 1: Challenges
Summary: Higher education's AI adoption is hampered by complex policy creation and tool selection.? Successful integration demands a cohesive strategy encompassing policy, tools, and robust support.? Proactive engagement is crucial to navigate the rapidly evolving AI landscape.
Lance Eaton's Getting to an AI Policy Part 2: A Moving Target
Summary: Higher education needs adaptable AI policies to keep pace with rapid technological advancements.? A structured framework for policy updates is crucial, encompassing clear communication and established revision procedures.? Integrating AI considerations into existing policies, rather than creating separate ones, offers a more efficient and adaptable approach.
Examples of possible academic integrity policies that address student use of generative AI tools
Summary: Academic integrity policies on AI vary significantly, ranging from complete prohibition to mandatory disclosure of AI use.? CMU's policy requires proper citation of all AI-generated content in assignments.? Using AI for graded work is generally prohibited to maintain academic integrity and skill development.
Emory? University Office of Admissions - Frequently Asked Questions (Including Use of AI)
Summary: Admission decisions are not pre-determined, and applicants should review admission profile data to understand competitiveness. The Admission Committee evaluates applications comprehensively and holistically. No specific comments can be provided on individual admission chances.
MetaLab at Harvard - AI Pedagogy Project - Quickstart Resources
Summary: The AI Pedagogy Project offers a variety of beginner-friendly resources, including guides, articles, and lesson plans, to help educators and students understand and integrate AI into education. It highlights classroom policies, ethical considerations, and practical tools, while also addressing concerns like bias, misinformation, and citation practices. The project encourages community engagement and provides links to online groups and curated resource lists for further exploration.
Professors address AI in new syllabus guidelines
Summary: St. Joseph's University requires AI usage statements in syllabi, offering restrictive, prescriptive, and permissive options.? Faculty debate AI's role in education, with some expressing concerns about critical thinking and others viewing it as a beneficial research tool.? The university supports faculty in implementing discipline-specific AI policies.
UC Santa Barbara -Guidance for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) Assistance Technologies
Summary: AI tools reshape teaching and learning, requiring instructors to adapt assignments and assessment.? Ethical AI use must be explicitly addressed in course policies and enforced, with resources available for both students and faculty.? Unauthorized AI use is subject to investigation by the Office of Student Conduct.
Lance Eaton's Syllabi Polices for Generative AI
Summary: This document is a compilation of syllabus policies regarding generative AI (artificial intelligence) tools, such as ChatGPT, from various educational institutions across different disciplines.? It was created by Lance Eaton to provide instructors with a resource for navigating the use of AI in education.? The policies range from complete bans on AI use to encouragement of its responsible and ethical implementation, with many offering specific guidelines on citation and appropriate use.