AI & FINANCIAL FRAUD: PROSECUTING FRAUD CLAIMS in Federal Court A FEW WORDS from A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ORDER

“? THE HALLMARKS OF FRAUD CLAIMS” :?

MISREPRESENTATION AND RELIANCE.

??No Doubt A. I. technology has many benefits; however, it’s? frequently ?offset by many lawsuits with claims of ?Financial Fraud, Judicial? misconduct and lawyer misconduct.?

?

If you are a Victim of Financial Fraud with ?cash or other assets???stolen, ??and the case is not big enough and widespread? to? get? the attention and help from the? DOJ to investigate and prosecute your claims, AND you can’t find a lawyer that believes in your case ???

You have 2 options:?

(1)? File a Civil lawsuit Prose? ?

(2) ???Stay silent and accept your financial loss, empowering the Fraudsters to defraud you and others more severely!? There’s plenty of these examples on American Greed!?

It’s Always great to see the FBI OR US ATTORNEYS with the Police, handcuff the Fraudsters and prosecute them!? ??

The Plaintiff must ?state the circumstances of the fraud with sufficient particularity to place the Defendants on notice of the precise misconduct with which they are charged. ?

?

.” Lum v. Bank of America, 489..

361 F.3d 217, 223-24 (3d Cir. 2004). In other words, the Rule “requires ?

Plaintiffs to plead the who, what, when, where, and how:?

first paragraph of any newspaper story.” In re Advanta Corp. Sec. Litig., 492

180 F.3d 525, 534 (3d Cir. 1999). This standard applies to all of

Plaintiffs’ claims sounding in fraud — i.e., fraud, fraud in the ?

inducement, and “fraudulent representation.”

See also, e.g., Optica, Inc. v. Metro Pub. Adjustment, Inc., No. 03- 496..497..

?======================================end=====

??

?