AI Expo for National Competitiveness 2024

AI Expo for National Competitiveness 2024

Written by Cindy Chin, CEO & Chief Space Officer of Planetary Systems AI .

Last week, I had the privilege to attend the inaugural AI Expo for National Competitiveness in Washington DC representing Planetary Systems AI.?The AI Expo is?the?place to convene and build relationships around AI, technology, and U.S. and allied competitiveness. The AI Expo is meant to serve as a forum for industry, government, and academic research entities to exhibit some of the latest technological breakthroughs — in AI, biotech, energy, networks, compute, microelectronics, manufacturing, augmented reality, and beyond — and discuss their implications for U.S. and allied competitiveness.

Jake Sullivan from The White House on stage at the AI Expo for National Competitiveness 2024. Photo: Cindy Chin/Planetary Systems AI

One of the many sessions I attended over the span of two days included Chairman Eric Schmidt’s fireside chat with Foreign Affairs’ Dan Kurtz-Phelan . Here are some key takeaways from that conversation about innovation, AI, technology, allied partnerships and more.

The capacity for innovation, the speed of domination has long been central in global power. At the national level, however, would be a public competition. Suppose you argue that this time, is it? It's not just the ingredients of economic or military or cultural power that there's something distinctly on point in non-military non-asset security areas.?

AI Expo for National Competitiveness Chair Eric Schmidt with Foreign Affairs Daniel Kurtz-Phelan. Photo: Cindy Chin/Planetary Systems AI

Soft power vs hard power:

The most valuable companies in the world are all now tech companies that should be an indication that what is happening is much bigger than a single company or your project or your whatever you're doing. Schmidt’s argument in the current debate on innovation, which came out of conversations was that the traditional framing and our policy and political science, is car power as an example in the ban of Chinese EVs (electric vehicles) in the United States.?Hard power is weapons and soft power is essentially culture and influence. However, the way you're going to win is by the speed with which you can innovate, whether it's in the hard power business of weapons or the soft power machine through innovation and competition in AI. The reason this is happening is that tech industry is building platforms that are very different and global in nature. Other examples of soft power include Hollywood, YouTube, and TikTok that is akin to television media, an average source of it controlled by China. Whether you debate good or bad, that’s is innovation power.

Innovation and scale around innovation at scale:

Another example of innovation power has found that through the courage and resistance. In Ukraine, against the much larger adverse area, where innovation is used to hold on and for a while to buy time now, illustrating varied amazing hard power (weapons) combined with innovation power against defense. So we're going to see whether they are going to be make and at least and really hold its scale. Speed of innovation is critical in advanced technologies.

China ???? and AI Development:

Industrial policy:?China, by becoming?a dominant player in electric fields through solar power and manufacturing. It is not something Schmidt would have predicted, but it's obviously a part of their industrial policy which different from America’s.?

China will lead in surveillance and will be very good at that, he said: They will ultimately have to regulate their AI systems heavily to keep to their rules about speech and freedom. The Chinese government will likely shut down of the speech and activity that will constrain innovation on AI development front. This is an advantage that democracies have, minimal constraints on innovation.

AI is the platform for everything and according to Schmidt, China is well behind for a number of reasons including:

  1. English as the most common training model language: The current generation of schools of models are trained. Using programming language, there is a lot more English language than various Chinese language on the web, including data to train models. China is working on closing that gap.
  2. Enter chain thought reasoning: ?when a model has been trained enough where you can say what you want and the computer can write python code or another command to make it happen. When AI can mimic human behavior or though reasoning, then it begins to appear like general intelligence.?
  3. Access to compute chips: Trump and Biden Administrations limited access to chips essentially above where on A100 relationships with chip manufacturers are not available in China and that makes it much harder for them to reconfigure and stay competitive.?
  4. AI industrial model is different. China is trying to make money with AI apps, which is a good thing to do and you'll probably succeed given the success of other apps globally. For platforms out there where AI applications are being done in America has been done with huge venture investment of millions of dollars. That is an amount of money that is not available in the Chinese system. So the Chinese ecosystem is a "field hamstrung by all of these obstacles" and the government is trying to figure how to fix that.

AI supply chain China ?????

There was a decoupling in semiconductor products, but trade with China went up. U.S. and China are like Siamese twins, one body two heads, depending on each other, but don’t always get along. Co-dependence is for global safety, but the CHIPS Act is a good thing.

EU and global AI innovation dynamic:

Schmidt says that Europe has an EU AI Act which makes it almost impossible to innovate at large?

scale which guarantees that the approach Europe is taking limits people and they are not going to compete in the strategic power game when it comes to AI. The development of non-human intelligence that makes our world better is the game for the rest of our lives along with the China question. He suspects that China will have trouble with this. The UK government started the U.S government followed. He predicts that Korea and France will follow in the next four months.

AI Talent & Pipeline

Africa

When asked about Africa and the rate of entrepreneurship and innovation happening on the continent, Schmidt points out one thing that is restraining innovation and that the lack of access to technical universities that is inhibiting progress. When he was CEO of Alphabet, he had a rule of placing at least 10 people into a country in Africa. People love Google in Africa. Why? There is a lack of available textbooks so Google was used to teach science students, where technical learning occurs, and help graduate students. There are many natural resources in Africa for AI manufacturing, but Schmidt does not think Africa will likely invent AI.?

America (doesn’t) want you:?

With regards to researchers and technologists, America’s strength is immigration. Schmidt and many business leaders agree that Washington’s stupidest policy is take the smartest people in the world, educate top minds at the best schools and then kick them out and create a competitor to America. It is not a good strategy, stop STEM talent or math and science people who want to work on competitiveness. (i.e., TSMC)

China’s Quantum Program?is open to people/immigrants who have been kicked out of America and that talent drain and innovation potential and top STEM skills are transferred.?

Other suggestions from Eric Schmidt in multi-lateral diplomacy discussions include:?

No Surprises Rule?when it comes to AI. communicate ahead of time any risks or issues. This will take a long time to negotiate.

Shared Society Risks

U.S., China, EU, etc have shared risks in nuclear weapons which is to be avoided at all costs.?

The late Henry Kissinger, who was a strong proponent of starting conversations with China now. The strategic power competition between U.S. and China is present, so you have to when diplomacy and soft power can be leveraged and avoid hard power and war as much as possible. War what it does to young men and women is so brutal. War is to be avoided at all costs.?

Other speakers included Palantir’s Alex Karp and CTO Shyam Sankar as well as representatives from big tech (NVIDIA, Cerebras, Microsoft, Meta, etc.), U.S. government agencies and government representatives along with small businesses in the commercial/private industry sectors.

Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar, Photo: Cindy Chin/Planetary Systems AI
Audrey Schaeffer, Slingshot Aerospace. Photo: Cindy Chin/Planetary Systems AI

More information about this year’s AI Expo for National Competitiveness can be found here:?https://expo.scsp.ai/

If you would further insights, please contact me to schedule a consultation on national AI competitiveness. The link is in the comments below. ??

Ada Williams Prince

Designing and curating global philanthropic and capital strategies for liberation | Ending violence against women | Economic, Gender, and Equitable Philanthropy

6 个月

Well done!

Margaret Isa Butler

Co-leader of BakerHostetler's Financial Services Industry Team | Lawyer to Family Offices, Institutional Investors, and Asset Managers on Fund Investments and M&A | Investment Banker | Entrepreneur

6 个月

Thank you for sharing!

Elizabeth Kiehner

Chief Growth Officer | Board Member | Former Founder | Keynote Speaker | Award-Winning Author | Advisor & Thought Leader

6 个月

I was there too. Bummed I missed you.

lynn casey

Keynote Speaker/ Futurist/Cultural and Consumer Insights Specialist, Forbes Women's Council Member

6 个月

Cindy C., FRSA thank you, as always, for sharing such keen insights and boundless enthusiam for what's next. By showing up with fearless curiosity and clear purpose you help the rest of us engage and embrace the future!

Pascal Morgan

LinkedIn Top Voice | Speaker | Advisor | Board Member | CIO - passionate about the future, society, and technology.

6 个月

Very informative and insightful as always, thanks Cindy. It's unfortunate that Europe has lost the beat in regards of AI competitiveness with its recent AI act. This would've been a great opportunity to strengthen, co-design, and constructively compete with the US (as with friends and sharing values). I would've loved to see European ethics by design paired with US entrepreneurship. Otherwise we won't be taken seriously as transatlantic partners for the challenges of the next decade, especially looking towards China.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了