AI: to be or not to be? That is the existential question...

AI: to be or not to be? That is the existential question...

"AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity, as shown by extensive research and acknowledged by top AI labs". [Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter , 33707 signatures]

This quote from the play Hamlet, “To be, or not to be? That is the question—Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And, by opposing, end them?”

With AI, “To be or not to be? That is rather the existential question for human beings.

What do AI, machine learning, and generative AI, mean, and how must be it all created in rational and sustainable ways? That could decide the future of humanity.

"Artificial intelligence refers to a collection of concepts and ideas, technologies and techniques that relate to a computer system's capacity to model and simulate human intelligence to perform human tasks to compete and replace human intelligence".

"Artificial intelligence refers to a collection of concepts and ideas, sciences, technologies and techniques that relate to a computer system's capacity to model and simulate the world and understand the universe to complete and empower human intelligence".

The former AI, known as fake and false AI (FFAI), owned by big tech and dominates the world of AI today. All FFAI is "AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity".

The latter AI, known as Real and True AI, which is still the underdog in the global AI race.

Now, who wins will decide for humanity its existential question, “To be, or not to be”?

Fake AI Mega Wealth vs. Real Human Abysmal Poverty

I was shocked to find out "How the United States Punishes People for Being Poo r" and local governments criminalize homelessness by making it illegal for people to sit, sleep, or rest in public spaces.

Meanwhile, the total market capitalization of the U.S. stock market was $55,253,720.4 million (or $55.2 trillion) on July 1st, 2024.

Its substantial part is created by "the largest AI companies by market capitalization " having the total market cap: $15.499 T, led by the big tech trillionaires: Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Meta Platforms (Facebook), Tesla.

To outlaw the FFAA, its multi-trillion market capitalization, we intend to launch the Global AI Big Tech Class Actions: Machine Intelligence and Learning (MIL) vs. Antihuman Intelligence (AI): the Statement of Claims.

The key statement claim is that "All today's AI owned by Big Tech (Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Tesla) is

1) mass-market consumer frauds,

2) green-like washing,

3) existential threat ("AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity, as shown by extensive research and acknowledged by top AI labs " [Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter]).

The Real AI class actions state a number of informed legal claims:

Nvidia "AI chips" are false and fake AI products and must be legally penalized

Apple Intelligence is false and fake intelligence and must be legally penalized

Microsoft AI is false and fake AI products and services and must be legally penalized

Amazon AI is false and fake AI products and services and must be legally penalized

Google AI is false and fake AI products and services and must be legally penalized

Meta AI is false and fake AI products and services and must be legally penalized

Tesla AI i s false and fake AI products and services and must be legally penalized

OpenAI AI is false and fake AI products and services and must be legally penalized

Especially, this refers to the so-called generative AI, large language models and Chatbots like ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and Microsoft's Copilot.

Real AI is the Only Future Reality

The goal of the Real AI class action litigations is to penalize "Big Tech Trillionaires for a Triple Techno Fraud: Fake/False AI, AI Washing or Existential Threat" for all the speculative amount, about 85-90% of market caps, in favor of developing and deploying a human-complete, human-friendly AI Technology as Real Machine Intelligence and Learning , as well as building the social smart housing across the globe.

Real AI as Real Machine Intelligence and Learning simulates and models reality, instead of human intelligence, to understand the universe and interact with the world in the most rational, effective and sustainable ways. [Trans-AI: How to Build True AI or Real Machine Intelligence and Learning ]

We have to outlaw the big tech FFAI unless they become techno-oligopolies domineering the global market, getting ‘inordinate’ power over our lives and future.

Resources

Real AI vs. Big Tech Fake/False AI, AI Washing and Existential Threat

Real AI vs. Big Tech Fake/False AI, AI Washing and Existential Threat

SUPPLEMENT: On Motivation

All human plans, initiatives, or actions are motivated by some causes, reasons, needs, drives, desires:

biological (primary, physiological, organic motives, as encoded motives) and cognitive (secondary, psychological, social, personal, as learnt motives),

such as as intrinsic and extrinsic,

push and pull,

egoistic and altruistic,

unconscious and conscious,

short-term and long-term motivation,

controlled and controlled,

immoral and moral,

or irrational and rational.

Our conscious, rational, extrinsic motivation is to bring about a better world of human-completing real intelligent machines to help humanize and intellectualize human life

All is by disrupting the big tech "AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity".

Contemporary AI systems are now becoming human-competitive at general tasks, and we must ask ourselves:

Should we let machines flood our information channels with propaganda and untruth??Should we automate away all the jobs, including the fulfilling ones? Should?we develop nonhuman minds that might eventually outnumber, outsmart,?obsolete and replace?us? Should we risk loss of control of our civilization? Such decisions must not be delegated to unelected tech leaders.?Powerful AI systems should be developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable.

Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter

Signatories The below is a sample of the most prominent signatories. View the full list of signatories here.

Yoshua Bengio, Founder and Scientific Director at Mila, Turing Prize winner and professor at University of Montreal

Stuart Russell, Berkeley, Professor of Computer Science, director of the Center for Intelligent Systems, and co-author of the standard textbook “Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach"

Bart Selman, Cornell, Professor of Computer Science, past president of AAAI

Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, Tesla & Twitter

Steve Wozniak, Co-founder, Apple

Yuval Noah Harari, Author and Professor, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Emad Mostaque, CEO, Stability AI

Andrew Yang, Forward Party, Co-Chair, Presidential Candidate 2020, NYT Bestselling Author, Presidential Ambassador of Global Entrepreneurship

John J Hopfield, Princeton University, Professor Emeritus, inventor of associative neural networks

Valerie Pisano, President & CEO, MILA Connor Leahy, CEO, Conjecture

Jaan Tallinn, Co-Founder of Skype, Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, Future of Life Institute

Evan Sharp, Co-Founder, Pinterest

Chris Larsen, Co-Founder, Ripple

Craig Peters, Getty Images, CEO

Tom Gruber, Siri/Apple, Humanistic.AI , Co-founder, CTO, Led the team that designed Siri, cofounder of 4 companies

Max Tegmark, MIT Center for Artificial Intelligence & Fundamental Interactions, Professor of Physics, president of Future of Life Institute

Anthony Aguirre, University of California, Santa Cruz, Executive Director of Future of Life Institute, Professor of Physics

Sean O'Heigeartaigh, Executive Director, Cambridge Centre for the Study of Existential Risk

Tristan Harris, Executive Director, Center for Humane Technology

Rachel Bronson, President, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Danielle Allen, Harvard University, Professor and Director, Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics

Marc Rotenberg, Center for AI and Digital Policy, President

Nico Miailhe, The Future Society TFS, Founder and President

Nate Soares, MIRI, Executive Director

Andrew Critch, Founder and President, Berkeley Existential Risk Initiative, CEO,...

https://futureoflife.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/FLI_Pause-Giant-AI-Experiments_An-Open-Letter.pdf

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Azamat Abdoullaev的更多文章