AI-Driven Adjudication: A Timely Necessity for Select Matters
CA Navjot Singh
Principal Pioneer at TaxTru | Navigating GST, Customs Laws & Foreign Trade Policy | Angel Investor | Designing Architect of TaxTru 2.0
If authorities are merely passing one-sided orders, what purpose does adjudication serve?
Will the introduction of Section 74A truly bring any improvement? They might add more forms like GSTR-2B, 2C, 2D, all the way to 2Z, but what are these even for? Whether it's assessments or audits, vague, one-sided notices are simply being converted into orders.
We all know how thoroughly an officer analyzes the situation when issuing a MOV-09! The adjudication of E-Way Bill issues has become nothing short of a joke.
Pardon my bluntness, but what is the role of the Proper Officer in this process?
Taxes are supposed to balance the ecosystem and instill discipline, but what about the hefty DRC-07 demands, followed by mandatory pre-deposits, and no tribunal to turn to?
How is this system being designed?
And let's not forget the elephant in the room—bribery.
The most common response to these one-sided orders is, "Get it done through an appeal."
I believe that the only solution might be the automation of error detection and mistake identification through AI, with minimal human interference in the adjudication process.
hashtag#GST hashtag#litigation
Founder NextGEN CA | Indirect Tax Specialist | Providing End-to-End GST Solutions | Managing Partner | Ex-PwC | Chartered Accountant | LLB
3 个月“‘Get it done through an appeal’ was mentioned to me twice today.” ??