AI Will Deliver Net Job Growth by the Next Presidential Election

AI Will Deliver Net Job Growth by the Next Presidential Election

The World Economic Forum released its report on the Future of Jobs earlier this week. We consider it good news. The gist: AI is not the hydra-headed beast that demolishes jobs, as it tramples through the global economy. Nor is it akin to a targeted assault on white collar workers—finally making even educated workers irrelevant.

The WEF attributes a small negative impact on employment growth to AI (about -1.6%) between 2015 and 2020. Moreover, many of the technologies that will deliver job growth, according to this analysis, will most certainly be integrating AI, which yields net positive employment growth.

Basically, in terms of AI, this is a story of incremental change. “Advances in machine learning, and natural user interfaces (e.g. voice recognition) are making it possible to automate knowledge-worker tasks that have long been regarded as impossible or impractical for machines to perform,” the report notes.

Notice that it does not say automate knowledge-worker *jobs.* This report, echoing research that McKinsey recently publicized, suggests that AI can now, finally, take over specific activities, but in rare cases does it eliminate a role completely.

This is a far cry from the doomsday scenarios, and their attendant fear-mongering headlines, that we’ve grown accustomed to.

And still, we think that’s a somewhat gloomy assessment of net job gain or loss.

There’s no doubt that AI will have a huge impact on the way we work. This process has begun and will extend well beyond 2020.

It will enable scientific discoveries that have eluded us.

It will allow us to interact with (and control) our machines via plain english.

And it will save millions of lives by driving at least some of our cars.

As for jobs, some research points to an “automation paradox.” In this week’s piece in The Atlantic, economist James Bessen explained that “it might seem a sure thing that automating a task would reduce employment in an occupation. But that logic ignores some basic economics: Automation reduces the cost of a product or service, and lower prices tend to attract more customers.”

Here at x.ai we are beginning to see this first hand. (And we are just one example of this phenomenon.) We’ve created an AI personal assistant who schedules meetings for you, Amy Ingram (and her brother Andrew). We’ve built Amy to completely take over the painful email ping pong required to schedule a meeting that most of the 87 million US knowledge workers engage in multiple times per day.

Our mission is to democratize the personal assistant; today, less than 5% of knowledge workers have access to a human personal assistant (or Executive Assistant).

What happens when you eliminate this one maddeningly tedious task for nearly everyone? You free up a lot of time.

Our data suggests (and research has confirmed) that scheduling a single meeting takes about 17 minutes. We know that US knowledge workers schedule roughly 10 billion meetings per year. The math is simple and staggering: that’s 2.8 billion hours—or 70 million work weeks—in a single year, which translates into billions of dollars in economic output.

As a business culture, we decided long ago, that our most expensive employees (the C-suite) should not schedule their own meetings, which is why those workers still have assistants that take on this work. Soon, anyone who schedules their own meetings now—whether they are a business owner, middle manager, or an entry level employee—will be relieved of it too.

Untethering knowledge workers from scheduling will not be instant; virtual personal assistants are just now coming to market. Still, over time, it’s hard to imagine people won’t find much more productive ways to use those hours. And when human creativity is unleashed, we’d expect to see more products and services invented. And that means more jobs.

Additionally, developing AI agents, like ours, and the hundreds of others on the horizon, requires plenty of human labor. Besides engineers and data scientists, we’ve hired AI trainers (humans who supervise the machine as it learns), customer success experts, and even, AI Interaction designers.

AI will be an agent of change. It will take over repetitive, rule bound work that computers are so good at. And it will open up opportunities for people to do meaningful work that requires the qualities humans have in abundance: creativity, empathy, and wisdom.

AI is technology and therefore has nothing to do with job creation and destruction. What is destroying jobs currently is excessive rules and regulations: It is a social problem, not a technological problem. Millions of people would create their own jobs as was the case in the past, if only they could. It is not either a knowledge, (people have never been has educated as they are now) nor a financial problem, (with fractional reserves we can create as much money has we need). Most sectors nowadays are protected by law, some with good reasons (doctors) many others with none but the political clout of entrenched power (civil servants of all stripes in Europe) In the current setting, AI implementations will be used to reduce employment because "work" cost too much and is therefore an easy target to raise profits. It does not need to be so but to change things we must change our social and political structure and that unless we fall under extreme stress will probably not happen.

回复

very interesting thanks, as AI develops in sophistication I see it taking over jobs eventually leaving those at the top and those predominantly in the services industry remaining with exceptions like entrepreneurs and dynamic thinkers who's inspirations will take substance from observations in new directions. it could be elements related to one industry used in another!! but as AI taps into WWW for its breadth of data this too will supplant much of what goes on! however the human brain at its best is a wonderful and dynamic tool! its interesting to see how humans and their societies will evolve and continue with all this time! look at Japan and the west already...

Kevin Kemper

Master's degree at California State University-Sacramento-creator of "Upside down income statement" and WOW Factor.

8 年

THIS IS 100% correct --esp because I am working on it in my firm too! Yeah

Melissa Basinger

Open to any venture that allows me to grow as an individual while helping others.

8 年

I read my first Asimov novel in 2nd grade. Having grown up with his stories, I am excited to have been born in the era of AI. I hope that AI can be used to better mankind as a whole and help bring equality.

László G. LOVáSZY, Ph.D.

Associated Senior Research Fellow at Social Futuring Center at Corvinus University of Budapest

8 年

It is an excellent article, I congratulate the author. Basically, I agree on most issues raised here, the need of further innovation in particular; however, there is one more thing to be discussed: the case of the people employed in the service sector with low or no qualification. The key must be a much better and more flexible and quality education because their number is huge (since the service sector employs 80% of employees in contrast to 1-2% of the modern agriculture sector) and not everybody will be a manager or an IT engineer or a programmer with extensive skill in maths. I am talking about a kind of gradual and controlled transformation in terms of employment market with special regard to the notion of and the sustainability of a consumer society. I am implying here the importance of speed of innovation and the application of newer technologies in terms of productivity and demographic change. With regard to virtual assistants, I think we have to revise our approach what kind of jobs could or could not be replaced by AI in a very short run (5-10 yrs). (I think we still haven't realized its scope - see my post on it below.) It is our interest to get more and more people to invest in their own knowledge and skills and at the same time to motivate them to learn and use newer technologies too in order to expand their productivity. It is a very difficult task and it requires all parties to contribute to a more secured and sustainable world based on mutual and responsible understanding. https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/two-pieces-food-thought-human-facial-expressions-lovaszy-ph-d-?trk=mp-author-card

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dennis R. Mortensen的更多文章

社区洞察