AI bots talking to each other is very inefficient

AI bots talking to each other is very inefficient

The podcast series “Shell Game” was quite eye-opening to me, where host Evan Ratliff created an AI bot of himself and tested it in various scenarios (answering spam calls, calling customer service, even calling friends). His approach to testing things out was fantastic, and it really got me thinking about how these AI bots can behave and what’s coming in the future.

One part that’s sticking with me is the idea of AI bots talking to one another, which is certainly happening a bit already and will be growing rapidly in the coming years. If you have people using AI bots to make robocalls, but then have people using AI bots to screen them, you’re going to have a lot of bots talking to one another. It’s similar to the idea of using AI on both sides of an email conversation.

Bot conversations are inefficient

What struck me was just how inefficient those bot conversations are. Compared to the speed of computers, human speech is painfully slow. A typical human speaks at around 150 words per minute, whereas a computer can easily process millions of words per minute. Rather than having two AI bots convert everything to human speech, if they had a way to negotiate directly using text it would be far more efficient — a 30 minute “conversation” could be done in seconds.

That said, what is the purpose of AI bots talking to one another? The biggest use of them today seems to be spam-related (or “customer service”). The spam pieces are fine, as inefficiency doesn’t matter. How about with customer service? If I need to rebook a plane ticket and I send a bot to do the work, why do they need to “talk” through everything? There should be some kind of mechanism where they can connect directly and just knock things out.

This opens a new can of worms related to protocols and connection methods, as there are already thousands of types of bots out there, so getting them to “connect directly” is far easier said than done.

Of course, as Evan shares in his show, maybe the time that they spend “talking” is irrelevant. It’s not tying up a phone line in the traditional sense, and the time it takes them to accomplish something isn’t usually a big deal. Maybe working through the unnecessary human speech pathway isn’t a big problem.

AI bots are changing things quickly, and it’ll be interesting to see where we end up in a few years. If you haven’t already, I encourage you to check out the Shell Game podcast and see what kind of thoughts it conjures up in you.

Carol Thompson

Founder, Bright Side Newspapers

16 小时前

Interesting article. Would love to publish it in my online Bright Side. Have a couple of questions about AI in general.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mickey Mellen的更多文章

  • Branding is building a story

    Branding is building a story

    When people think about branding, they often think about logos and colors. Those are important aspects to a brand, but…

    4 条评论
  • What is considered spam?

    What is considered spam?

    The definition of spam and cold calls is pretty simple — it’s outreach that the recipient didn’t ask for. If you do…

    6 条评论
  • Great logos are often just brands that you admire

    Great logos are often just brands that you admire

    Think about a great logo. A truly classic logo.

  • Two more big steps in de-Googling

    Two more big steps in de-Googling

    Over the last year I’ve taken a lot of little steps to de-Google my life. I won’t be able to escape Google completely…

  • Social Media is becoming Interest Media

    Social Media is becoming Interest Media

    The nature of social media is undergoing a huge change. All of the major social networks are changing to show you less…

    5 条评论
  • The Sunday Summary: Messy brains, duplicate content, and easy credentials

    The Sunday Summary: Messy brains, duplicate content, and easy credentials

    In an effort to help me keep up with everything I post each week, here is my latest “Sunday Summary” of my posts from…

  • Change your mind or prove that you’re right?

    Change your mind or prove that you’re right?

    I write quite often about the value in changing your mind, largely because it’s something that I work hard to do. I…

    4 条评论
  • Credentials are the easy part

    Credentials are the easy part

    As recently shared by Seth Godin, there is a big difference between credentials and expertise. They might overlap a…

    2 条评论
  • Appreciate their interests

    Appreciate their interests

    Charles Duhigg’s book “Supercommunicators” has many great insights in it, and a big thread through the book is about…

  • The BOOX Note Air4 C

    The BOOX Note Air4 C

    As time has gone on, my wife and I have felt a stronger and stronger pull to distance ourselves from Amazon. There is a…

    5 条评论