AI, Blockchain, AR/VR, Which One Is A General Purpose Technology?

AI, Blockchain, AR/VR, Which One Is A General Purpose Technology?

The noise about disruptive tech is deafening; Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) creating crypto-millionaires at a pace causing even governments to worry, brain + machine interfaces and your face replacing your fingerprints/passwords. These, and other propositions that truly make it seem like we live in a world that is moving faster than most of us can adapt to. But which of these technologies will go beyond the hype and truly change our lives at scale? Which of these will be a General Purpose Technology (GPT).

What is a General Purpose Technology (GPT)?

To assess the question above, I decided to look at these technologies through the lenses of General Purpose Technologies (GPT). GPTs are those technologies that impact economic growth, and transform both household life and the ways in which firms conduct business. The examples that quickly come to mind are steam, electricity (#1 in my opinion), internal combustion, computers and the internet. I’ll also throw in telephony. These technologies fundamentally impacted how we live, expanded our lives (physically and emotionally), built our cities and changed how we interact with the world around us. According to Bresnahan and Trajtenberg, GPTs also have 3 fundamental features or characteristics

  1. GPTs are pervasive and spread to most sectors
  2. GPTs improve over time and should keep lowering the costs of its user
  3. GPTs spawn innovation making it easier to invent and produce new products or processes.

There is a discussion about productivity gains as a characteristic of GPTs. This is a divisive topic as, depending on inputs into the measures of productivity (is it a product GPT or a process GPT?), school of economics you subscribe to, and time frames considered, not all GPTs provide productivity gains. But they are still considered GPTs. There is also the recognition that some GPTs increase the productivity gains from the GPTs before them. For example, vehicular transportation, a GPT, was improved by electrification.

For our own purposes, while the 3 broad features or characteristics can be applied to any GPT, we’ll filter further by adding a 4th (and I’ll suggest important filter) feature

4. Is the GPT fundamentally disruptive and foundational? Electricity displaced the technologies of lighting, mechanization, and processing that came before it. It is also foundational to many of the GPTs we consider absolutely necessary nowadays (telephony and the Internet are two GPTs that wouldn’t exist without electrification). Are any of the new technologies this foundational? Especially within the next 2–5 years.

AI as GPT

The most likely GPT, from the analysis above, is Artificial Intelligence. It is already being applied in our shopping recommendations and companies are already using intelligent agents to detect malware, to prevent money laundering and automate claims process at an insurance company in Singapore. Like, electricity, all the other technologies being hyped right now can only truly achieve their potential with the aid of AI. This is why most of the folks who understand what’s going on (and, honestly, some who do not) are focused on this particular technology. 

And it makes sense that AI might be the option; we need more energy efficiency than renewables, AR and VR will impact us less than the transition from radio to TV, connected devices are still (basically) devices and the trustless promise of blockchain/cryptocurrencies require us to first trust the underlying system.

While the AI hype far surpasses the true capabilities at this point, as Kevin Kelly rightly points out in this fantastic article, AI will change business as we know it. Because, if it achieves its potential as a GPT, and as the researchers in the quote below suggest, it’s about to be a bumpy ride…

overall the evidence clearly supports the view that technological progress is uneven, that it does entail the episodic arrival of GPTs, and that these GPTs bring on turbulence and lower growth early on and higher growth and prosperity later .”

Please share, like, and tweet. 

You can indicate your interest in ‘Radar’, the Bloomberg-terminal like platform for monitoring private company innovation and strategy. Asha Labs provides innovation strategy consulting to executives in the utility industry.

Sign up for the Polymathic Monthly Newsletter — if you’ve read this far, I’m betting you’ll love it. You can buy my book Antifragile Grid on Amazon.

Geoff Sanders, PMP

I can get there from here - Software Development and Integration

7 年

Good to see other points of view. From your chart I see your source is unsure as to the pervasiveness and improve over time characteristics of blockchain. Blockchain is more than cryptocurrencies, although they seem to be the current killer app. Blockchain has and will improve over time. Ethereum is a big step forward over bitcoin, and the hard forks provide a mechanism for them to improve. It will be pervasive, and we will want to be as it will provide security in our transactions, and in authentication of documents. Blockchain has the potential to make redundant companies like Equafax, although they seemed to be doing that all by themselves.

回复
Will REMOR

Building Stablecoin & RWA Unicorns | Product | Risk | Data Science | Venture Mentor & Investor

7 年

Great article.

回复
Andrew Hung

Digitalisation | Sustainability?|?FinTech

7 年

Great article.

回复
Thomas Rietzler

Digital consultant and business developer

7 年

AI should be divided in weak and strong. I agree with the analysis for weak AI, but strong AI is not there yet

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了