Agile Warfare: Embracing Submarine Self-Sufficiency on the Battlefield

Agile Warfare: Embracing Submarine Self-Sufficiency on the Battlefield

In the evolving landscape of modern warfare, the capacity for resilient and autonomous battlefield operations is no longer just an advantage—it's a necessity. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has laid bare the vulnerabilities inherent in fixed assets, reinforcing the urgent need for adaptive, mobile solutions that can withstand the rigors of contested environments. By adopting the principles of self-sufficiency demonstrated by modern submarines—integrating critical systems such as computing, storage, data transport, SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility), cooling, and power—we can construct battlefield architectures that operate independently and effectively under even the most challenging conditions.

Submarines as Models of Unyielding Self-Sufficiency

Modern submarines are ideals of self-sufficiency, engineered to function autonomously for extended periods without external support. These vessels are equipped with advanced computing power, secure storage, reliable data transport mechanisms, and sophisticated cooling and power systems—all essential for continuous operation in isolation from traditional communication networks. In an environment where failure is not an option, submarines maintain their missions even when cut off from external resources, exemplifying the resilience required in today’s battlespaces.

The operational independence of submarines is not just a feat of engineering; it’s a strategic necessity. Submarines must navigate and execute missions in some of the world’s most hostile environments, from the deep ocean to contested maritime zones. This self-reliance ensures that they can continue their operations even when traditional communication and support networks are compromised—a scenario increasingly likely in future conflicts where adversaries will target centralized command and control (C2) systems.

Applying Submarine Design Principles to Future Battlefield Architectures

The principles underpinning submarine design offer a compelling blueprint for future battlefield architectures. As adversaries become more adept at disrupting Command, Control, and Intelligence (C2I) capabilities, reliance on backhaul transport to cloud-based resources or higher headquarters for critical software platforms introduces significant risks. The future of military operations demands a "Bring it With You" mindset, where military units are equipped with all the necessary components—computing, storage, cooling, and power—to operate independently, even without external support.

This approach is not just about redundancy; it’s about survivability. In an era where adversaries can sever communications and disrupt centralized networks, the ability to operate autonomously can mean the difference between mission success and failure. By applying the self-sufficiency principles of submarines to ground and air operations, military units can ensure that they remain operationally effective, regardless of the challenges posed by a contested battlespace.

Mitigating the Risks of Centralized Systems in Warfare

Ukraine's conflict has highlighted a critical vulnerability in modern warfare: no fixed asset is truly secure. Adversaries have demonstrated a willingness and ability to target fixed data centers, communication nodes, and operations centers, effectively severing military units from essential resources and information. In this context, adopting a "shoot and scoot" strategy—akin to the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS)—is not just advisable; it's imperative. By staying mobile and agile, military units can evade detection, reduce their susceptibility to counter-attacks, and maintain their operational capabilities as mobile compute, network, or operations nodes.

This shift towards mobility reflects a broader trend in military strategy, where flexibility and adaptability are prioritized over fixed, centralized solutions. The ability to move quickly and reconfigure operations on the fly is increasingly seen as a critical advantage in modern conflicts, where the battlespace constantly shifts, and the speed of decision-making can be the deciding factor.

Deployable Data Centers: The Key to Autonomous Battlefield Operations

Deployable data centers present a practical and scalable solution to address the challenges of modern warfare. These rugged, portable computing units can be rapidly deployed to the front lines, providing the necessary computational power for advanced platforms like inference AI, which enables precision targeting, real-time decision-making, and long-range fires. By positioning compute capabilities closer to the warfighter, these deployable data centers minimize reliance on vulnerable backhaul connections to the cloud or higher command, ensuring that military units have the processing power they need where they need it most.

Deployable data centers are more than just a stopgap measure; they represent a fundamental shift in military operations. By bringing critical computing resources to the edge of the battlefield, these units empower military forces to operate with greater autonomy and flexibility, reducing the time it takes to process and act on information and enhancing the overall effectiveness of military operations.

Powering the Battlefield with Tactical Microgrids

The future battlefield will require advanced computing capabilities and resilient and scalable power solutions. Currently, military units rely heavily on generators to power their operations, which, while effective, can be cumbersome and vulnerable to disruption. Tactical microgrids offer a forward-looking alternative: self-sufficient, scalable power systems specifically designed for deployment in the field. These microgrids would provide a reliable energy source in even the most challenging environments, ensuring the continuous operation of autonomous battlefield architectures.

Tactical microgrids are more than just a power source; they represent a crucial enabler of modern warfare's self-sufficient approach. By providing a dependable and flexible energy supply, these microgrids ensure that military units can maintain their operations without interruption, regardless of external conditions. This capability is particularly critical when traditional supply lines are disrupted, and units must rely on their resources to sustain operations.

Enhancing the Transport Layer for Communication Resilience

In the interconnected battlespace of the future, the transport layer—the backbone of data and communication transfer—will play a crucial role in maintaining operational resilience. While satellite and fiber connections will remain essential for reaching higher headquarters or allied forces, deployable data centers will likely serve as aggregation points for local operations. By integrating these data centers with a software-defined network that connects to the base's tactical communications infrastructure, military units can maintain robust communication capabilities, even in contested environments where traditional communication channels are compromised.

The transport layer is not just about moving data; it's about ensuring that information reaches the right people at the right time, even in the most challenging circumstances. By enhancing its resilience, military units can remain connected and informed, even when operating in environments where communication is difficult or disrupted.

The principles of modern submarine design provide a clear and actionable roadmap for constructing resilient and self-sufficient battlefield architectures. By adopting the "Bring it With You" mindset and deploying rugged, adaptable solutions for compute, storage, cooling, and power, military units will be better prepared to face the challenges of future conflicts. The lessons of Ukraine serve as a stark reminder that the time to act is now. By embracing these principles, military forces can avoid the harsh realities of tomorrow's battles and ensure they remain capable and effective in the face of evolving threats.

The future of warfare will be defined by those who can adapt and operate independently, leveraging advanced technologies and self-sufficient systems to maintain their edge on the battlefield. The blueprint for this future is already in place; it’s time to bring it to life.

?

Jeffrey Baur

PMW-200 Product Director

2 个月

Yep. When ADM Grady challenged us to develop a strategy to improve self sufficiency, a great deal of my thoughts were guided by some of the fundamental principles of the Submarine Force. The resulting campaign (Future of Sailor Maintenance or FoSM) looked across the spectrum of resiliencancy and identified desired human and technology capabilities that we needed to attain. The TYCOMs, NETC and Acquisition responded and have moved out on a number of lines of effort to reach this goal. I was fortunate enough to brief CNO on the campaign and its progress and how my new Commander at the time, ADM Caudle, refocused our efforts on some of the longer term actions. There’s a lot of work left to be done but the progress we’ve made so far has been pretty promising. Sometimes it’s not the fighter who throws the heaviest punch who wins, it’s the fighter who can take the punch and keep fighting who prevails.

David Cole

Principal @ Organic Code LLC | Commercial Real Estate, Advanced Technology Site Selection

2 个月

Looks like Tony has a prototype in mind and a location he would like to try it out. I also think Tony wants to use his Navy SMRs to power his mobile supercomputer satcom stations. I think his mobile data centers are going to need an enormous amount of uninterrupted clean power in close proximity to support the AI processors, satellite transmissions, and data storage. He may even be thinking he wants to deploy and monitor air and submarine drones from his data center command center. Will need access to a helicopter pad and deep water docks.

Rick P.

Information Technology

2 个月

Relating mobile warfare platforms to submarines is indeed necessary and timely, current conflicts demonstrate the need for self sufficiency in the field. I am no expert but it seems to me we already have the outline for this with units such as the Navy Seals and the Army Rangers. Applying their operational tactics with those of submariners would be the ideal platform with which to build the mobile land based warfare systems we need now and well into the future.

Steve LeFavour

Capital Raising, Private Placement of Equity and Debt

2 个月

Napoleon had this figured out. Used to train his Lt’s to be mobile and autonomous.

Dave S.

"The proper function of man is to live, not to exist - I shall not waste my days - I shall use my time" | Driving my Say/Do=1 | Unapologetic Polymath | Strategist I Navalist | Multiple Submarine Commander I McKinsey/CIA

2 个月

Once the hatch shuts you are on your own

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tony Grayson的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了