Agile vs. Waterfall Methodologies
Nam Sing Then, PMP
Senior Project Manager | R&D Program Leadership | Risk Mitigation | Stakeholder and Communication Management | I Help Companies Increase Project Efficiency by 15%
Understanding Agile and Waterfall: When to Use Which Approach for Optimal Results
Agile and Waterfall are two of the most common project management methodologies, and understanding when to use for which project can significantly impact a project’s success. In my experience, one of the biggest challenges is choosing the proper methodology for a given project, as both have their strengths and weaknesses.
In one project, we initially used a Waterfall approach with a rigid structure, and the team focused on completing most of the deliverables in each phase before moving to the next. As the project progressed, we encountered several changes in the requirements, which made the Waterfall approach less effective as it would mean going back to the previous phase and completing more deliverables before moving to the next.
To adapt, we switched to an Agile methodology, and with the support from the Product Owner, it allowed us to incorporate changes more efficiently and deliver incremental value to the stakeholders. This experience taught me that while Waterfall is ideal for projects with well-defined requirements and timelines, Agile is better suited for projects that require flexibility and continuous feedback.
Another challenge I have faced is managing stakeholder expectations around the chosen methodology. In one project, the stakeholders were unfamiliar with Agile and expected a detailed, upfront project plan similar to what they would see in a Waterfall project.
I held many meetings to explain the benefits of Agile, including the ability to adapt to changing requirements and deliver value incrementally. Once the stakeholders understood the benefits, they became more comfortable with Agile's iterative nature and became more engaged in the process.
Most of the projects I have implemented use a hybrid approach, where I combine elements of both Agile and Waterfall methodologies. For example, in one project, we used Waterfall for the planning and design phases, where the requirements were well-defined, and then switched to Agile for the development and testing phases, where flexibility was needed. This hybrid approach allowed us to benefit from the structure of Waterfall while also taking advantage of Agile’s adaptability.
Choosing the proper project management methodology depends on the project's nature and the stakeholders' needs. This will require the Project Manager's understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of both Agile and Waterfall, and by using hybrid approach when necessary, I was able to deliver successful projects that meet the project’s requirements and the stakeholders’ expectations.
CLICK on: ?https://lnkd.in/g-BAdK5z to connect with me
My Superpower : https://lnkd.in/gh35RhYN
My Recommendations : https://lnkd.in/gMrNe7DK
Hit the ?? on my profile to get a notification for all my new posts.
I am a member of #lbfalumni and #skyhightower tribe.
RevOps & MOps Consultant at Curao specialized in Manufacturing & Healthcare | Digital MOps Director | HubSpot Solutions Partner | WomenTech Network Member
5 天前I love ?? Agile! I use it for marketing for the same reasons you mentioned, its flexibility.
高级银行与技术顾问|数字业务转型|客户解决方案| FinTech | Blockchain
1 周Yes it is a tight rope to balance. But one should be prudent to know when to use what, and that will be the key to success.
Technology Project and Program management at I
1 周This comparison is going on from Ancient times.. Goodf!!
Certified Estate Planner | Unlock Your Financial Future | Tailored Financial Solutions
1 周Choosing the right methodology can make all the difference! Nam Sing ??
Singaporean | Senior Technology Leader | Asia Pacific Japan Middle East | AWS Professional | Microsoft Azure | CISM | CISA | CRISC
1 周Balancing structure and flexibility is tricky. A rigid plan can break under change, but too much flexibility can lead to chaos. The key is knowing when to adapt while staying on track.