Agile Migration: A Perspective For CTOs

Agile Migration: A Perspective For CTOs

Steve Butler Steve Butler

Steve Butler

?? Technical Programme Manager | IT Transformation Director | Cloud Migration | Data Centre | Application Modernisation | Cost Optimisation - Delivered ￡30M in Savings | Author | Speaker

发布日期: 2024年9月12日
+ 关注

Introduction

In today's fast-paced IT landscape, the pressure to deliver new features and products quickly is relentless. Agile methodologies have emerged as a popular solution, promising increased productivity and efficiency. However, migrating to Agile can be a complex undertaking, especially for large organisations with established processes.

My Experience with Agile Migration

Over the past two years, I've been involved with a significant modernisation program involving upgrading over 10 million lines of Java code, a migration to Azure, and the adoption of SAFe Agile. While the experience was undoubtedly challenging, it provided valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of both Agile and traditional Waterfall methodologies.

领英推荐

Key Observations

  1. The Need for Hybrid Approaches: While Agile offers many benefits, it's often necessary to adopt a hybrid approach that incorporates elements of Waterfall. This is particularly true for large-scale projects with contractual obligations and defined deliverables.
  2. The Importance of Traditional Metrics: Despite the focus on iterative development in Agile, traditional metrics like timelines, progress bars, and percentage completion remain essential for providing stakeholders with visibility and oversight.
  3. The Role of Tools and Technology: The right tools can significantly streamline Agile adoption. Azure Boards, for example, has proven to be a valuable asset in our organisation.
  4. The Challenges of Agile in Contractual Environments: Agile's emphasis on backlogs and iterative development can sometimes conflict with contractual requirements and payment milestones.
  5. The Importance of Effective Communication: Agile ceremonies like Daily Stand-ups and Art Syncs can be valuable, but they require careful management to avoid repitition, overload and ensure effective communication across teams.

Conclusion

Migrating to Agile is a journey, not a destination. It requires careful planning, effective communication, and a willingness to adapt. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of both Agile and Waterfall, CTOs can make informed decisions about how to implement Agile in their organisations.

What are your experiences with Agile migration? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Nick Wesson

Building Elite Microsoft + AI Teams | Microsoft Certified | Helping organisations drive Innovation with Microsoft Data + AI | Microsoft Talent Director | Dog Training Enthusiast | Mental Health First Aider

6 个月

Thanks for sharing Steve Butler, some very interesting insights for a lot of people!

赞
回复
1 次回应
Nick Sales

I get founders from Seed to Series B and beyond | Software product development help for founders | Fortune 500 CTO | Product definition, planning, development team building, delivery oversight | PhD in AI

6 个月

A good read Steve Butler. I share your perspective on adoption of agile methods being a journey. I'd add a couple of thoughts from my perambulations (!) too: - I've never seen two implementations of any agile flavours that are the same - ...and none of them followed the manual for more than a few weeks Waterfall gets slammed, and rightly so overall. But there's one aspect of the approach which can get left out of agile if there's always a rush to "do": Thinking about what the customer needs, and defining it clearly enough before heading off to build!

赞
回复
1 次回应
查看更多评论

要查看或添加评论，请登录

Steve Butler的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了