AGI reasoning meets Enterprise AI reasoning  - by a combination of O1, Knowledge Graphs and Causal Graphs - from an LLM first perspective

AGI reasoning meets Enterprise AI reasoning - by a combination of O1, Knowledge Graphs and Causal Graphs - from an LLM first perspective

Hello all

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays? :)

Continuing from my previous blog 3 parts?

  1. Chicken and the egg: its more impactful to think of of knowledge graphs and causal graphs supporting LLMs rather than vice versa Part One
  2. AGI reasoning meets Enterprise AI reasoning - by a combination of O1, Knowledge Graphs and Causal Graphs - from an LLM first perspective ...part two (this post)
  3. The role of ontology in causal graphs and knowledge graphs for LLM reasoning part three

My overall thesis is: "AGI reasoning meets Enterprise AI reasoning"? - by a combination of O1, Knowledge Graphs and Causal Graphs - from an LLM first perspective i..e. Without having the need to set up either a graph or a casual infrastructure.? I am simply interested in applying O1 with KG and CG to Enterprise AI reasoning problems within the context of the LLM itself ie setting up the KG and CG infrastructure within the LLM itself for the purpose of reasoning using what I call conceptual knowledge graphs

To do this, let’s explain the reasoning capabilities of O1 for complex problem solving. Before we do so - I also wanted to say that - I am not keen on the AGI / Non AGI debate.

An overview of the reasoning capabilities of O1 is as follows:

1. Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Definition: The ability to solve problems by breaking them down into logical steps.

  • Processes multi-step problems incrementally.
  • Explains intermediate steps, making the reasoning process transparent.
  • Useful in mathematical problem-solving, logical reasoning tasks, and decision trees.

2. Planning

Creating structured sequences of actions to achieve a goal.

  • Generates multi-step plans for achieving objectives in complex environments.
  • Balances short-term and long-term objectives while handling dependencies.
  • Excels in scenarios such as project management, scheduling, and strategy development.

3. Hierarchical and Contextual Understanding

Understanding the context and the relationships between concepts at different levels of abstraction.

  • Performs well in tasks requiring the synthesis of high-level summaries and granular details.
  • Integrates contextual knowledge to produce tailored and relevant responses.
  • Useful for knowledge-based tasks like summarization, report generation, and research.

4. Visual Reasoning

Interpreting and reasoning about visual inputs such as images, diagrams, or charts.

  • Recognizes objects, patterns, and relationships in visual data.
  • Solves visual puzzles and responds to image-based questions.
  • Ideal for applications like visual Q&A, design analysis, and augmented reality tasks.

5. Code Reasoning

Understanding and generating executable code with logic and structure.

  • Debugs code by identifying logical errors and suggesting fixes.
  • Optimizes code for efficiency and readability.
  • Creates functional software solutions, automating repetitive or complex programming tasks.

6. Tool Use

Integrating external tools into its reasoning process to improve accuracy and functionality.

  • Leverages calculators, APIs, and databases to enhance task execution.
  • Executes commands, retrieves data, and integrates external resources dynamically.
  • Useful in applications requiring external data access or complex calculations.

7. Meta-Reasoning

The ability to reflect on and improve its own reasoning processes.

  • Identifies gaps or weaknesses in its reasoning and adjusts dynamically.
  • Refines responses through iterative processes (e.g., self-correction).
  • Enables continuous learning and adaptation in real-time tasks.

8. Multi-Agent Collaboration

Coordinating with other AI models or agents to solve complex problems.

  • Shares information and responsibilities with other agents in a system.
  • Facilitates collaborative decision-making for large-scale tasks.
  • Excels in scenarios like distributed computing, robotics, and multi-agent simulations.

9. Ethical and Interpretive Reasoning

Applying ethical frameworks and understanding human perspectives.

  • Recognizes and avoids potentially biased or harmful reasoning.
  • Aligns responses with ethical guidelines and user intentions.
  • Ideal for sensitive domains such as legal assistance, healthcare, and policy analysis.

O1’s reasoning goes beyond simple pattern matching, offering logical consistency, depth of understanding, and contextual relevance. It integrates various reasoning modes—visual, logical, and meta—makes it adaptable to a wide range of tasks. It also has the ability to reflect and iterate enhances its performance over time, ensuring solutions that are both accurate and interpretable.

How can O1 reasoning be combined with causal graphs and knowledge graphs

How o1 Enhances Knowledge Graphs:

  • Natural Language Querying: o1 can interpret and convert natural language queries into graph traversal tasks, making knowledge graphs accessible to non-technical users.
  • Inference over Relationships: By leveraging the relationships in the graph, o1 can deduce new insights. For example:If the graph knows "John is Sarah's brother" and "Sarah is David's mother," o1 can infer "John is David's uncle."
  • Contextualization: o1 can use graph data to enhance the relevance and precision of responses. For instance:In medical applications, o1 can use a graph linking symptoms, diseases, and treatments to suggest appropriate diagnostic paths.

How o1 Enhances Causal Graphs:

  • Counterfactual Reasoning: o1 can use causal graphs to answer "what if" questions by simulating potential outcomes based on causal dependencies.Example: In a causal graph modeling climate factors and crop yield, o1 can predict how a change in rainfall might affect production.
  • Intervention Planning: By identifying key nodes in the causal graph, o1 can suggest optimal interventions to achieve desired outcomes.Example: Identifying marketing actions that maximize sales while minimizing costs.
  • Causal Explanations: o1 can interpret causal graphs and provide explanations in natural language, enhancing transparency.Example: "Increased advertising leads to higher brand awareness, which drives more sales, as shown by the causal graph."

The combination of these components allows for deeper, multi-dimensional reasoning

1) Knowledge Retrieval with Causality: o1 can query knowledge graphs while incorporating causal reasoning to provide richer answers. Example: "What are the economic impacts of reducing taxes?" combines fiscal data (knowledge graph) with cause-effect predictions (causal graph).

2) Intervention Design: Use knowledge graphs for contextual knowledge (e.g., patient medical history) and causal graphs to determine treatment effects, with o1 synthesizing insights. Example: Recommending personalized treatments based on a patient's profile and likely outcomes of interventions.

3) Multi-Hop Reasoning o1 can traverse both causal and knowledge graphs to perform complex reasoning across domains. Example: In a supply chain application:Use a knowledge graph to map suppliers, logistics, and customers.Use a causal graph to model delays and their downstream effects.o1 provides an integrated strategy to mitigate disruptions.

4) Explainability: By combining o1's language capabilities with graph structures, explanations become more intuitive and human-readable. Example: "Factory downtime caused a supply chain delay, as shown by the causal graph. This affected retail stock levels, reducing sales by 15%, as inferred from the knowledge graph."

LLM first approach?

To conclude

My overall thesis is: "AGI reasoning meets Enterprise AI reasoning"? - by a combination of O1, Knowledge Graphs and Causal Graphs - from an LLM first perspective i..e. Without having the need to set up either a graph or a casual infrastructure.? I am simply interested in applying O1 with KG and CG to Enterprise AI reasoning problems within the context of the LLM itself ie setting up the KG and CG infrastructure within the LLM itself for the purpose of reasoning using what I call conceptual knowledge graphs

Finally ..

If you want to study #AI with me at the #universityofoxford - please see my course on AI (almost full now - only last few places remaining) https://conted.ox.ac.uk/courses/artificial-intelligence-generative-ai-cloud-and-mlops-online

If you want to be a part of my community see Creating a community (LinkedIn group) for my blog - where you can ask me questions re AI

If you want to work with me, we are recruiting

For some elements of this post I have used LLMs?

Joseph Pareti

Board Advisor @ BioPharmaTrend.com | AI and HPC consulting

2 个月

so the breakthrough is graph network ? and how do you think o3 achieves these scores ? https://www.thealgorithmicbridge.com/p/openai-o3-model-is-a-message-from?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

回复
Chris Hodgson

Senior Enterprise Software Sales Leader | Strategic Business Advisor | AI and Digital Transformation | Innovation Advocate | Business Process Automation | Banking & Financial Services | Global Account Leadership

2 个月

Merry Christmas

Srinivas Kumar

Civil Engineering Professional | Geotechnical Engineering And Management

2 个月

interested

回复
Keith Jones

Senior .NET Full Stack Developer | C# | .NET Core | ASP.NET | JavaScript | TypeScript | React | Angular | Azure | AWS | Agile | 100% Remote Role

2 个月

I am interested.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ajit Jaokar的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了