Agency vs Corporate | Insights Association Panels

Agency vs Corporate | Insights Association Panels

There is a general tension between clients and agencies, and it’s not something necessarily unique to market research. It exists in most service-based businesses. Clients have particular needs that they lack the capability and resources to achieve by themselves. Agencies offer these capabilities and resources at a marked-up price, but need to spread their costs across multiple clients in order to succeed.

There are many nuances to this and reasons for this tension, and there are many who have worked on both sides that have seen why. Yet the delta still exists.

Revenue is a big driver of this from an incentive/operational perspective, with there being an irony that client research teams need to be more commercially minded whilst agencies need to be less.

I found these two panel discussions insightful and wanted to compare and contrast what agencies are thinking to that of the end client (with a little help from Ipsos Facto).? It would be great to hear from the panelists as well. Feel free to jump in.

?Points of Agreement:

  • Importance of Global Trends: Both groups emphasize staying abreast of global trends, suggesting a shared understanding of the need to adapt to a dynamic marketplace.
  • Embracing Technology (Especially AI):? Both acknowledge the importance of technology, particularly AI.? However, both also stress that AI is a tool to augment human capabilities, not replace them.
  • Need for Creativity:? Both value creativity, although they express it differently. The agency side mentions "co-creation" and "permission to fail," indicating a desire for a supportive environment for innovative thinking. The client side emphasizes "creativity with findings," suggesting a focus on insightful interpretation and presentation of data.
  • Growth is Key:? Both groups are concerned with growth—the agency side with growing the industry, its people, and client business, and the client side with finding growth for their own businesses.

?Points of Divergence:

  • Focus: The agency group emphasizes internal factors like talent development ("high-quality talent," "grow our people"), industry knowledge, and leveraging AI to understand consumers. The client group is more externally focused, prioritizing understanding consumers as people, achieving business outcomes ("if it doesn’t drive the business, don’t do it"), and efficient team operation ("need my teams to be more efficient").
  • Communication and Deliverables: Clients desire concise, impactful communication ("giant decks need to be narrowed down…replaced with narratives"), while agencies highlight the importance of multiple data sources and a "complete view," which could lead to more comprehensive (and potentially lengthy) reports.? The client's desire for immediate communication of value and differentiation suggests a need for agencies to be more upfront and succinct in their presentations.
  • Working Style: The agency group discusses the "need to be flexible and adaptive," suggesting an openness to change and experimentation.? The client group expresses a need for simplicity in working with known partners while also seeking "new thinking," indicating a tension between established relationships and the desire for fresh perspectives.
  • Client Relationships: The agency group mentions "client first," indicating a commitment to client service.? The client group focuses on internal team efficiency and business impact, suggesting that agencies must demonstrate clear value to retain clients.

?Overall:

Both groups share core values around innovation, growth, and the strategic use of technology.? However, their perspectives differ regarding internal vs. external focus, communication styles, and the specific ways they seek to achieve their goals.? Agencies appear to be more internally focused on developing their talent and expertise, while clients prioritize business outcomes and efficient execution.? Bridging this gap requires agencies to demonstrate a clear understanding of client needs and deliver concise, impactful solutions that drive business growth.

?

Additional Insights (Based on General Knowledge):

The dynamic between agencies and clients is constantly evolving, especially in today's rapidly changing digital landscape.? Agencies need to be agile and adapt to client demands for greater efficiency, transparency, and demonstrable ROI.? Clients, in turn, need to be open to new approaches and collaborate closely with agencies to leverage their expertise and achieve shared success.? Clear communication, shared goals, and a strong understanding of each other's perspectives are crucial for a productive and mutually beneficial partnership.

Thank you to Melanie Courtright, Wayne Levings, Ramon Melgarejo, Mary Ann Packo, Melissa Sauter, Nicola Blue, Natasha Hritzuk, Jing Mertoglu, and Khary Campbell for your time and candid contributions. After all, we do need to collect and connect the dots (thank you, Nikkia Reveillac).

Christina Nathanson, MBA

Director Market Research | MBA in Marketing

1 个月

John Bird, great summary. I was not able to attend CRC this year. An antecdote I would add (if not mentioned) is transparency across the relationship, even when the relationship is new. There should be an opportunity to share the learnings and successes with each other. Sometimes the agency isn't in the room because the client has accountability for the deliverable. It would be extremely beneficial for the client to share the feedback on what the endgame result of the research so the agency knows where they stand and their impact on their client's business strategies. I practice this all the time as we love projects that have "long-legs" ??

回复
Horst Feldhaeuser

Group Services Director, Fellow, QPR, Mentor, Market Research Evangelist, Industry contributor, writer of quirky song lyrics

1 个月

Brilliant summary John Bird. ?I love this comment "Clear communication, shared goals, and a strong understanding of each other's perspectives are crucial for a productive and mutually beneficial partnership." - which hopefully leads to long-lasting and trusting partnership, where both parties have room to experiment as well.

Keri Vermaak

Passionate for People; Deliberate with Data

1 个月

Hi John Bird - thanks for sharing your thoughts. Loved the point "Communication and Deliverables: Clients desire concise, impactful communication ("giant decks need to be narrowed down…replaced with narratives")" I am reminded of big big, be bold... and be gone. Mic drops have an impact (in a positive way). It means something that this was noted as one of the best conferences of the year for you!

Laura Bright

Marketing Strategy & Market Research Consultant

1 个月

Oh John, thanks for sharing this. Must have been a great panel discussion, and equally great behind the scene convos that helped you prepare this. It is a another example of how everyone tries, but we don't always connect where it matters most for the other partners. One of my favorite topics, and I love how you've thoughtfully laid out a few of the hurdles. I wish we talked more about getting the commercial context right, for designing and sizing the work, and for reporting it. Always room for improvement, but only if you can do it faster please.

Karine Pepin

?Nobody loves surveys as much as I do ? Data Fairy ?No buzzwords allowed?? Quirk's Award & Insight250 Winner

1 个月

Super interesting,John Bird. To your point around communication and deliverables, yes, clients want "concise, impactful communication," but they also want a giant appendix to have in their back pocket... I think the key is to realize that the project isn't done when you deliver the report. There needs to be another step, which is to create bite-sized content that will engage stakeholders. I know an agency ...??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

John Bird的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了