The Age of Nature Again with the Discipline of Ancient Thought for Veterinarians

The Age of Nature Again with the Discipline of Ancient Thought for Veterinarians

?

?

1.????? Abstract

If you work for the health of a living being, you have to know the history of that living thing or living things. Medical sciences as a single discipline cannot go far back in history. Because living things are much more than we can get close to today. What we can observe today can only be an illusion. The classification of living things, the time periods in which they live and the discovery of environmental conditions have a much longer history than the history of the discovery of diseases. The way to remove this illusion may be possible with multidisciplinary studies. The history of our planet can shed light on the domesticated species we encounter in our modern lives today and their behavior. With its complex structure, it does not seem easy to understand all living things.

Whether it is modern urban creatures, their ancestors in nature or all extinct creatures, it is possible to understand the common fate of nature and its contents as a whole and to analyze the effects and changing behaviors of each natural dynamic. One of the main problems of health sciences today is to ignore the geographical sciences, the queen of the sciences, who created the systems and disciplines of thought that explain and understand the history of nature. Losing direct contact with reality, that is, with nature, we believe that knowledge or positive sciences do not and will not conform to the thought models we have accumulated since Ancient Greece. Moving away from interpretation, forming a hypothesis, and trying to explain our hypothesis by coming into contact with reality is the indispensable truth of our desire to know, which is our purpose of being. ?For our species, which naturally has to know, the price of moving away from this philosophy is a fast approaching empire of dark thought. We have to test science with knowledge. The way to meet reality directly is to return to the natural age and listen to these great scholars again.

?

2.????? Keywords

Veterinary medicine, Veterinary nutrition, Natural history sciences, Geography, Philosophy, Zoology

?

3.????? Introduction

Natural history is full of traces left by living things from past to present. [1] Our job seems a little easier as the work of researchers working on written historical records proceeds largely in an order that is open to evidence through the interpretation of written facts or legends and myths.

What about history before?

The history, before the man...

When it comes to living things and their secrets, the positive natural sciences need multidisciplinary interpretation of the disciplines of geology, physics, chemistry and biology. We should not forget the philosophy of knowledge. The existence of a living form other than the species we know and that developed independently of planetary dynamics can remain hidden in fairy tales as a myth for the time being. Who knows, maybe it will be discovered one day.

The theories you find with the disciplines of verification are valid in the situations that the Earth and all its dynamics allow you to, and in the conditions of the time period of that day.? Creating isolated areas for nature can be beneficial for the species. These isolated areas may be the key to speciation, but the price of isolating information or squeezing it into one or more disciplines is falsification. [2]

When it comes to living beings and their lives, knowledge becomes a unique adventure that can expand so infinitely that it cannot be the subject of a single discipline. [3] [4] Whether veterinary medicine or human medicine is in need of the resources of positive natural sciences and research. [5] The time is approaching to wake up from the slumber of the broad illusion experienced by all working clinicians and industry professionals.?

Our planet, where the fate of living things is determined by the results of a series of geological influences that force the earth's geography to change [6], is still testing living things and their lives [7]. We now know that in the history of the great mass extinctions [8], many different lives have come and gone on our planet [9]. Of course, it is not possible to encounter the original forms of these creatures today, but it seems possible to understand their behavior in the relationship between prey and predator with their descendants today. Why? Because our planet that we call Earth has the same common need. Water and food [10]. The history of disease [11] and the stories of animal domestication [12] must tell us that they are new weapons that we use today to improve our defenses against the destructive effects of the same forces.

If every living thing constructs this complex chain over and over again [13], it should not be difficult to understand the potential reflex of this chain. In our opinion, even establishing this simple hypothesis is enough to prove that we need different disciplines.

Life is in everything that lives... What you are used to seeing, what you can touch. So all of us.

?

4.????? Materials

??????? 4.1 The discovery by observation of taming first carnivore animals.

How can you change the deadly behavior of a wolf [14] ? Our predictions are that as two species fighting for the same resources in the same competition areas over long periods of time, we and the wolves may have cooperated under difficult conditions. Through a long and painful adaptation adventure, we have developed a close friendship with the descendants of this common ancestor today, and it all started when we realized that we could discipline them in the first place.

These two societies, whose reflexes to social life have developed, may have accelerated their first steps [15] in their common destiny towards domestication activities. Early wolf ancestors may have more easily achieved their feeding goals with individuals who were sensitive to being disciplined. Noticing these calm individuals may have suggested an opportunity to satisfy our need for protection. When we break the initial resistance, natural reflexes inevitably turn into domestication [16] activities. They may have participated in our hunting activities over time for the purpose of easy feeding. Who can refuse a meal that is killed for you? This natural relationship of interest may have made them more docile.

The courage of individuals with docile characteristics to approach human habitation must have occurred not by chance, but in response to the mutualist principle of the laws of nature. We should also know that wolf and human rapprochement takes place under these difficult conditions [17]. Mutual life is another reflex of being able to survive in nature. This beneficial association, which increases the survival probability of the human species, seems to have provided the same advantage to the canine species [18]. They have always been closest to us in our steps of building our civilization. It is a partnership that still exists.

The situation should have been a little more complicated when it came to cats. [19]. We are of the opinion that the domestication of cats was not as effective a natural action as dogs in the struggle for survival of the human species. Belief systems widely developed in fertile agricultural areas, especially in Mesopotamia, may have given this small predator a meaning other than its natural functions. But we don't think this little competitive predator knows that. As we have observed in the same dogs, the need for easy food, the need for protection, rodents demanding food ready to eat with the development of agriculture, aquaculture and farm animals that have become easy prey with maritime activities may have become attractive feeding tools for them.

In the evolutionary process, cats [20], an active creature at night, have found a way to use water more efficiently. Gaining water from what they eat [21]. This metabolism is a very useful method in arid climates. Like every living thing, they may have found the secret to easier access to the energy they need to survive in harsh conditions in these beneficial productions of humans. Nor did they have to provide a great benefit to people to share their energy resources. They must have managed to endear themselves without difficulty in the Middle East ?[22], which is dependent on belief systems.

Especially in the near eastern geographies [23] where agricultural and maritime activities developed, these people, with their belief cultures and developed systems that produce plenty of energy, may have responded to the desire of cats to be domesticated, albeit by a series of coincidences.

??????? ???4.2 The small disasters that come with agriculture and domestication

Written history is not independent of the date before the invention of writing because laws are everywhere and always with us.

An old rule was waiting in the dark to create a new ecosystem against our modern new colonies. He did not try very hard to attack when he had the opportunity, because he was an unknown enemy and a weak prey who took refuge in the ineffective rituals of the tales [24] of faith in order to defeat him. Mankind...

Living collectively and in small areas is a basic rule that accelerates disease transmission between species. Our efforts to domesticate animals and modify them to improve them according to their different characteristics may have turned these wonderful weapons into a dangerous enemy for us.

We cannot deny that these rapid developments have been learned by experience in the absence of modern testing methods. One of our biggest problems is that other creatures that want to feed easily slip into our living spaces and these creatures approach us spontaneously with these natural life reflexes. While not as terrible a killer as major mass extinctions, epidemics and diseases have also been written in our history [25] as small mass extinctions.

??? ???????4.2.1 The power of rational ideas in the dominance of fairy tales

The weapon of domestication in the survival cycle also brought new lives to plants and animals with the invention of agriculture. It was a time of abundance, and when we first believed we were successful, it didn't take long for us to realize that these successes were also illusions. Nature is everywhere and its laws are precise. The addition of plants and animals that provided the labor and protein we needed may have ushered in a new civilization, but the principle of the laws of nature to keep living things equal was about to teach us a great lesson. A new enemy that we can't see, but that manages to kill most of us. Murderers who are tried to be destroyed by the mercy of the forces in the heavens. Microforms of life, pathogens.

There are many cultures in our history that have developed and successfully used agriculture. We can call only one of these cultures, and even only a very small part of this culture, a civilization. The only place where even divine tales can be criticized and their great philosophers. they are the ancient Ionians. Medicine may have made breakthroughs in Egypt, China, India, and partly Central America, but outside of the Ionians, there was no culture that had the courage to approach activities of forgiveness with rational criticism against a great power thought to have come from heaven. Therefore, with the exception of the Ionians, other ancient agrarian societies of that period could not translate their knowledge into scientific disciplines. Of course, it has had its benefits in the development of medicine, but the prohibition of the discussion of ancient knowledge by a strong authority has seriously affected the accumulation of knowledge and rational work in these societies.

If there is no curiosity, there is no science. Instead of old tales of faith, you might think of technology for today, because curiosity is replaced by things that are believed to be a superior force. We are still of the opinion that we are acting with the fear written in our history.

???? ??????4.2.2 The development of observational medicine with the Ionian discipline

In the story that led to the invention of observational medicine through animals, we arrived at the disciplines of this historic adventure thanks to our ancient Ionian philosophers and scholars. For the first time we tried to understand nature with the ancient Ionian philosophers. We thought to describe the change of nature. before this part of our history, we were only at the mercy of the priests who tried to illuminate the realities around us through theology [26]. With this incredible move of the pre-socratic philosophers, we discovered rational systems of criticism, invented the first methods of testing knowledge. They are the founders of our comparative systems, [27] which are used for the science of today and provide illumination of the entire history of the past.

You can also call them the first natural historians, the first biologists, or the first veterinarians. Animals were the heroes of this story. Anatomy, physiology, infectious diseases or taramatic surgery, pharmacology, and their entire life cycles are replete with these pioneering first discoveries in our history [28]. They already knew very well that animals were part of nature. There could be no better living structure in which we could apply our comparison reflex. In response to the attitudes of theological disciplines towards human cadavers, animals have become the closest and most accessible subjects to us, with structures similar to ours to begin the history of medicine [29]. They discussed the functions of organs [30], and these rational arguments were almost similar to what we understand today. The essential components of a great treasure transformed into observational medicine [31] by the thought disciplines of our ancient Ionians are hidden in the history of all of us, in the story of animals.

All our materials, all the resources of our lives are in nature. Acting only on the illusion that we have managed to defeat nature, our obsessive connection to technical developments, is about to block the way for us to test knowledge with the actual laws.

We have to be careful. Life is about to find a way.

?

?

5.????? Method

5.1 Building the hypothesis with observations

Let's proceed with a simple observation that some of us have experienced.

If your cat is watching you from a high place in the house or attacking your feet at night, or if it stretches its paws to a high point and smashes your furniture and curtains, you are witnessing the laws of nature that have entered your home. If these laws still work flawlessly, we believe that it is rational to defend the hypothesis that not much has changed from the past to the present. Living beings like to express themselves in whatever their purpose of existence dictates. Living beings live to achieve their goals, and although the functions of transmitting their natural behavior vary, they pass on these characteristics to their next generations.? Whether it's the influence of natural dynamics, modern city life and the behaviors that we manipulate, or the effects of other competing species, these functions are common to all of us.

Just like any extinct ancestor does.

Even this simple hypothesis based on observation is quite difficult to prove. How can you verify it? Can you use mathematics? How do you convert this simple knowledge to science?

?

5.2 Rational Criticism

In our professional life, we are simple people who work with small animal health. Pet owners who come up with a new pet behavior and different questions almost every day are part of our job. In the treatment process, we often have to deal with difficult problems. We, who are stuck in a single discipline understanding with medical science, do not yet grasp the value of being able to explain the basic problems to animal owners and patients with the facts in nature.

We have to accept that our explanations are getting tighter. The world is constantly changing. With everything in it. Faced with the fact that our work proceeds solely on the basis of disease, and that patterns of behavior are tied to every discipline outside of our own, it shouldn't take long for us to realize how small we are in the name of nature and its laws. [32][33][34]

The number of clinicians specializing in a specific subject is almost as small as we can count. We are left with understandings closed to new thoughts, obsessions and protocols that cannot even initiate thought, and our vicious circle based on medicine. The world is much older than what we see and can touch. We also have to learn all the experiences of nature. Waiting for our industry to develop until we find a way to come into direct contact with reality can only be a big mistake. Like the misconception we believe has developed today.

The laws of nature are not only in nature. [35] For the pets we are used to seeing near us in our modern living environment, these laws apply in the same way as they do to each of us. This is exactly our focus. To understand nature from the past to the present and compare today's pets with real laws, and finally to get to the source of their actual behavior. The sheltered environment of our cities and our comfortable consumption habits may seem to have accustomed them to this comfort, but nature is everywhere and is constantly changing. Although the reactions of one or several species to modern life may seem partially the same, you can witness dozens of proofs that this is an illusion.

?

6.????? Mankind and Natural Comparison Ability

Let's we begin again.

If your cat is climbing high places and watching you;

Is there a more natural explanation for wanting to watch potential hunting grounds and see potential resources through the big window, whether it's domestic cats, living ancestors in nature, or as a prototype mini-hunter with similar hunter characteristics to their extinct ancestors?

Could it be that a prototype predator who suddenly gets tangled up at night is using your feet as a training tool to improve the tactic of ambushing? Finally, your shattered curtains and furniture. I am here and this place is under my control. Could it be a different language to say that other competitors will understand who I am with these perfect scratches?

Do we know of an authority or animal owner who can falsify this observation?

No matter how much civilized technologies we create, the way we express ourselves in nature is always the same. So were they, and so were those in the past.

Observable patterns of behavior naturally turn into a reflex of comparison through our senses, which enable us to collect information. It seems to be the most primitive method of testing. Observable patterns of behavior naturally allow us to make a comparison. Observational information that provokes our sense of curiosity and surprises us every time explains our reason for existence from the most complex to the simplest. The fact that we naturally have to know. Like all of us. We are the Sons of Man...

This is the way we express our natural self. Understanding how every living thing expresses itself can also keep them away from character traits they never had. Like the perfect killers or killing machines we use for hunters. It's like a useful way for us to understand that they carry the instinct to kill as a result of their efforts to just eat and make themselves which they seem stronger. Because this is how hunters express themselves and realize their purpose of existence.

Nature is a cruel place and you can have a lots of rivals or enemies. Are hunters the only ones fighting to seize large quantities of sustainable food, that is, energy? Don't the hunts also fight for their own energy resources?

If you are a competitor to the same source, you have to dominate. [36] And in order to dominate, you have to believe that you have succeeded with plenty of practice. Plenty of games. And when you're ready for deadly workouts and the first blood. Successful hunting, feeling good and strong, gaining courage can make you feel strong. You may also need a show of strength. Pointing to all your weapons and saying that the ruler is mine can be as natural as talking to hunters. Isn't all this organization and effort a worthy enough goal to win, and to kill your food shortages as a reward and multiply your generations with this energy?

The strong can survive or use resources efficiently by helping each other. [37] Isn't it our planet and the dynamics that provide the conditions that initiate and sustain life to be responsible for all these natural behaviors? Just like what happens inside your house. Easy, risk free, abundant and sustainable energy as we live and cherish. Although hunting in grocery stores, not in the field, is a difference of our own, we are almost the same.

As those who live and live in conditions that quickly and impatiently imitate nature, we are finally waiting for the mercy of our planet again. Although we try to cut ourselves and those around us off from nature. Sorry no genre has been able to do that. Mankind will not succeed either.

?

7.????? ?Falsification Discipline

Naturally, we have to know…

Understanding our place in nature and our relationship to everything else was not a new reflex. Ancient Greek philosophers and scholars laid the foundations for a worldview that we cannot fully call science today, but that developed ideas closest to science. They showed how knowledge could evolve into science by inventing the first disciplines of scientific thinking, scientific criticism. And we. Mankind. We have seen this light. Because today, just like our ancient ancestors, we naturally want to know.

Today it is the basic thinking discipline of hypotheses to observe, to set a reference point, to criticize rationally, to advance a phenomenon with falsifications in order to begin an idea. It may be unacceptable to most authorities, but we think it is the fundamental duty of our civilization to once again honor the founders of this system. In our opinion, this task should be the basic duty of all humanity. This system is a very valuable piece of discipline that may prove to be one of the most effective methods for predicting the ecosystems, environments and possible behavior of historical and extinct creatures before the invention of writing.

For your verification system, try recommending a better method to reconstruct a fossil when you have the rocky remains of an extinct creature or no living specimens of that creature. [38][39]

?

8.????? ?Reference Frame

Moving away from the chaos with Ancient Philosophy…

Induction seems like a great method for illuminating dark topics from the past to the present. With deduction, we can follow this chain backwards. We can also compare living things with their ancestors in the fossil record. [40] With the idea that this is exactly the starting point we need, the way to understand the behavior of domestic species for all professionals working for veterinary health is only possible by understanding the relatives and characteristics of those creatures by using other scientific channels and researches.

Time travel from the present to the past.

The confusion brought about by their observational knowledge and all criticism shows us for a short time a small fiction of nature. Moving in the right direction in this chaos is only possible with a good starting point. As a good guide, the way to move forward with comparative disciplines should also be aimed at getting rid of the complexity. For a good starting point, living creatures today seems like a good idea. When the fossil record obtained in geological periods does not provide us with much material, we understand the value of this method more clearly.

?

9.????? Discussion

Our planet is governed by laws that do not sacrifice one living thing for another. We are all in the same struggle. Knowledge, the greatest weapon of our reign, commands us to reconsider this war. Solving problems depends on developing our capacity to think. Naturally, we are all real, and we must be in direct contact with that reality. Sooner or later. We have to compare the information we obtain with our modern systems with the natural information we acquire through our physical senses. Neither more nor less.. We must stay within the confines of our imitation reflex. Just as we cannot transcend the limits of our observational reflex. Real ideas require originality. The only thing that is original is the fact that the unique nature that our planet rules is constantly changing.

We pay the price of unlimited expansion with the risks of mass disease. You should not be harmed by a substance that you have tamed. We forget. It's just an illusion. None of us are perfect. We live in a planet that can constantly change, and living things are necessarily changing along with the planet. We are also alive. We have to submit to the same laws because we are all part of this planet.

Laws are everywhere. It has even established an ecosystem within us. Whether it's in lives too small to see with our eyes, or in creatures big enough for us to notice them. Whether in natural conditions or in our modern and artificial life. We are all fighting to survive against the constant change and sudden decisions of our planet. So far we have emerged victorious from this war, but it is not eternal. A cycle from infinity to infinity can only be a law that belongs to our universe. Cold and dark. We are only living beings who can react to the natural dynamics on this planet? [41]. It's just that in every life cycle our life forms change.

The focus of health sciences researchers on diseases and treatment technologies as the main research topic accuses medical disciplines of making medical disciplines much more complex today. Every specialty moves away from multi-discipline and closes within its own sector boundaries. The work is carried out in environments that imitate nature with a lots of micro details and is becoming more and more isolated. The cost of working with too much micro detail turns into a mass of systems where a fictional success story is marketed by employees who ignore the real dynamics, and poor quality services with related training gaps. It has also become very difficult to begin a new study with health systems that keep up with this new order. All our intriguing desire to gather information based on observation has been replaced by comfortable study rooms. We have to rethink where we're trying to go. We are losing touch with reality. In every field, we perceive nature with the conditions we have constructed. We are in the stage of losing the freedom to be human and naturally to express oneself with the desire of each individual to want. We force hunters to live like us, seeing the natural way of expressing themselves as barbaric. In another link of the chain, there are living beings who are not even aware of this model. We need to rethink what or to whom our effort to make them look as far away from nature as ourselves serves.

The evidence in written history allows us to understand our activities in agricultural practices, how we developed medicine as a result of our curiosity by drawing words and learn each process step by step. But we need to know that at the root of our thought we cannot interpret life on our planet with the invention of writing alone. Natural history [42], which has a unity that we need to understand from a multidisciplinary perspective, is the common history of all of us. Along with the date before the invention of writing. We need to realize again that these multidisciplinary studies have reached our present day and our very long history with the disciplines of ancient thought.

Veterinary disciplines are the result of our history of survival testing with the laws of nature that apply to all of us.? It is the story of a series of events that we must do in order to survive successfully. We have a long and torturous history that allows us to use the plant or animal resources around us as a weapon more advantageous against our competitors with our ability to observe and compare. Every study we initiate on animals, whether through the activities of theological disciplines or through the sheer power of the mind, serves the purpose of succeeding in the new ecosystems that the human species has created to survive. We must not forget. Every practical move against our planet succeeds in creating a new ecosystem. Even inside our house today. The laws are still with us. Laws are everywhere.

These ancient systems of mind, which can shed light on a great natural history could provide a greater insight into medical studies [43] that are becoming dependent on current technologies and increasingly compressed into micro-details. We are the heirs of a great accumulation gained through these disciplines. Isn't reading and understanding our history a real enough proof?

All our developments and discoveries up to the present day have been discovered through the use of the disciplines of the natural mind [44]. We still act with the same reflexes. The codes in our genes command us to think. As it has been throughout our entire history.

Observing, comparing, testing, and falsifying nature in order to get closer to reality, eventually combining our technologies with these ancient methods of information gathering. We must be in direct contact with reality [45]. We need to think like the Ionians again and understand natural history and our place in this history through multidisciplinary approaches.

These ancient disciplines, illuminating the dark ages, could also enable us to understand the behavior of pets today. Because nature is a complete whole and behaves as a single mass. Therefore, every moment or every event that takes place on our planet is a whole. Our past illuminates our present, and you call it history. Observing and comparing the behavior of our planet is a certain fact that we all need to understand. Just like our ancestors did. All humanity needs is to think critically and look for what might happen right now in the history of the past. Who knows, maybe we can delay our 6th mass extinction as it appears in our future. if we can stop our intellectual extinction.

If we can think naturally again...

Conculusion

We. Modern Mankind. Spoiled children working for our own end…

Our desire to transfer our promises of comfortable living to every living thing we find close to should be a part of this great illusion. These creatures, whose main reason for life is to act with predator genes, are too valuable to be a part of this illusion. We are trying to change our planet. Unfortunately, we will not succeed. Like all of us, like everything else on this planet, they live for their own purposes of being.?

We are trying to change the planet. Unfortunately, we will not succeed. We only discipline the materials we see as useful around us. The way to understand that we can never domesticate is the fact that we cannot determine what is natural. We are all at the mercy of our planet. Unfortunately, we forget this real truth.

Diseases have existed throughout the entire history of living things. We, as beings at the end of this history, have just defined this situation. We discovered these early discoveries with our observational knowledge and ability to compare. Again in the light of observational knowledge, by testing in nature. As a result, our first treatments were found with the same method. We used plants and animal materials as a means of treatment.

We must recognize that we need a serious educational reform for the human species whose purpose of existence is to understand and think about nature. We must go back to the origin of our thinking. Making natural philosophy and natural history mandatory for all students of positive sciences and health sciences is not a dream. We are about to succeed. In our view, all the positive sciences and health sciences can draw a new destiny for the human species that is part of the history of evolution. Meeting once again with those who have discovered the mind and once again thinking like wise people...

We must go back to the origin of our thinking. Naturally, we have to think and observe. With our mind, knowledge and observations, we must return to old systems of thought in order to be able to solve the immediate problems we face in a timely manner. For the working life and achievements of each of us. In order to react quickly to the momentary problems we encounter with the fact that we have to move forward with multidisciplinary combinations again, we should make it a standard plan to think in a multifaceted way with our hypotheses or current approaches. Isolated thoughts, sectors, research, treatments, or lives are about to turn into an inadequate and hollow fiction in our age where curiosity is lost. We, the dominant species of our planet, must accept the fact that we must return to the natural age before we can end the cost of our accelerated, impatient life with a mass extinction. We must test our explorer souls in the heart of nature with courage, not in conditions that mimic nature.

Making direct contact with reality is inside your home or at the heart of our planet. Because the laws of nature are everywhere... Let us think only rationally and criticize with reason.

To all the teams and professionals working for the positive natural sciences, to the brave people who make natural history and records available to us, who study the dynamics of our planet and finally connect all disciplines. With our gratitude to explorers and all academic disciplines and scientists.

?

10.? Bibliography

‘[Disease and Treatment in the Old Testament] - PubMed’. Accessed 29 September 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12269376/.

‘Augur Anxieties in the Ancient Near East | Ancient Divination and Experience | Oxford Academic’. Accessed 29 September 2022. https://academic.oup.com/book/32442/chapter/268784621.

Blits, Kathleen C. ‘Aristotle: Form, Function, and Comparative Anatomy’. Anatomical Record 257, no. 2 (1999): 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990415)257:2<58::AID-AR6>3.0.CO;2-I.

CASSIDY, ANGELA, RACHEL MASON DENTINGER, KATHRYN SCHOEFERT, and ABIGAIL WOODS. ‘Animal Roles and Traces in the History of Medicine, c.1880–1980’. Bjhs Themes 2 (2017): 11. https://doi.org/10.1017/BJT.2017.3.

Chalmers, A. F. ‘Epidemiology and the Scientific Method’. International Journal of Health Services 12, no. 4 (1982): 659–72. https://doi.org/10.2190/5d7c-ynq6-byum-4194.

Corkett, Christopher J. ‘Some Notes on the Aristotelian Origin of the Distinction between a Falsificationist’s and Verificationist’s View of Science: Together with Corrections to My Earlier Account’, 31 October 2012. https://dalspace.library.dal.ca//handle/10222/15671.

Cosans, Christopher E, and Michael Frampton. ‘History of Comparative Anatomy’. ELS, no. December (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0003085.

Donovan, Stephen K. ‘History of Palaeontology’. ELS, 2001, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0003097.

Driscoll, Carlos A., Marilyn Menotti-Raymond, Alfred L. Roca, Karsten Hupe, Warren E. Johnson, Eli Geffen, Eric H. Harley, et al. ‘The near Eastern Origin of Cat Domestication’. Science 317, no. 5837 (2007): 519–23. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139518.

Frigg, Roman, Erica Thompson, and Charlotte Werndl. ‘Philosophy of Climate Science Part II: Modelling Climate Change’. Philosophy Compass 10, no. 12 (1 December 2015): 965–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/PHC3.12297.

Galibert, Francis, Pascale Quignon, Christophe Hitte, and Catherine André. ‘Toward Understanding Dog Evolutionary and Domestication History’. Comptes Rendus Biologies 334, no. 3 (1 March 2011): 190–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRVI.2010.12.011.

Heikkinen, Tom, Annual Drinking, Water Quality, Water Main, Flushing Program, Cross-connection Control Program, and Wellhead Protection Program. ‘Water Quality (/ Water / Water- Quality )’. Handbook of Hydrology 3, no. Rosborg 2015 (2016): 1–5.

Hull, Pincelli. ‘Life in the Aftermath of Mass Extinctions’. Current Biology 25, no. 19 (5 October 2015): R941–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2015.08.053.

Istanbulluoglu, Erkan. ‘An Eco-Hydro-Geomorphic Perspective to Modeling the Role of Climate in Catchment Evolution’. Geography Compass 3, no. 3 (2009): 1151–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00229.x.

‘KPopper_Falsification’, n.d.

‘Mange | Definition, Causes, & Facts | Britannica’. Accessed 17 September 2022. https://www.britannica.com/science/mange.

Mcdiarmid, John B. ‘THEOPHRASTUS ON THE PRESOCRATIC CAUSES’, n.d.

Mitchell, Peter. ‘The Archaeological Study of Epidemic and Infectious Disease’. World Archaeology 35, no. 2 (2003): 171–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0043824032000111353.

Nicolosi, Riccardo. ‘The Darwinian Rhetoric of Science in Petr Kropotkin’s Mutual Aid. A Factor of Evolution (1902)’. Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 43, no. 1 (1 March 2020): 141–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.201900023.

‘Our Furry Friends: The History of Animal Domestication — Journal of Young Investigators’. Accessed 17 September 2022. https://www.jyi.org/2012-february/2017/9/17/our-furry-friends-the-history-of-animal-domestication?amo_session=186112_1006.

Pausas, Juli G., and William J. Bond. ‘Humboldt and the Reinvention of Nature’. Journal of Ecology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1 May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13109.

Racine, Valerie. ‘Georges Cuvier (1769-1832)’, 10 July 2013. https://hpsrepository.asu.edu/handle/10776/5914.

Schmitt, Stéphane. ‘Studies on Animals and the Rise of Comparative Anatomy at and around the Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences in the Eighteenth Century’. Science in Context 29, no. 1 (2016): 11–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988971500037X.

Short, Jeff, J E Kinnear, and Alan Robley. ‘Surplus Killing by Introduced Predators in Australia-Evidence for Ineffective Anti-Predator Adaptations in Native Prey Species?’, n.d. www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon.

Stephen J. Hernandez-Divers, BVetMed, CBiol, MIBiol, DZooMed, MRCVS, DACZM, RCVS. ‘World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, 2005’. VIN.Com, 30 March 2015. https://www.vin.com/doc/?id=6694579.

‘The Domestic Cat: The Biology of Its Behaviour - Google Kitaplar’. Accessed 29 September 2022. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=GgUwg6gU7n4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA179&dq=cats+domestication+history&ots=V17J1Lf95f&sig=dEQtywsCY7d2oZxSoF4_lGxie5c&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=cats domestication history&f=false.

Wallace, AlfredRussel, and Charles Darwin andAlfredRussel Wallace. ‘Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, Volume I William Buckland Volume III Geology and Mineralogy, Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, Volume II William Buckland Volume IV Omphalos Philip Gosse Volume V On the Origin OfSpecies Charles Darwin Volume VI Palaeontology Richard Owen Volume VII Man’s Place in Nature Thomas Henry Huxley Volume VIII The Geological Evidences Ofthe Antiquity OfMan’, 2003.

Wallace, AlfredRussel, Charles Darwin andAlfredRussel Wallace, David A. Morrison, Riccardo Nicolosi, and A. F. Chalmers. ‘No Title’, n.d.

?

?

[1] Juli G. Pausas and William J. Bond, ‘Humboldt and the Reinvention of Nature’, Journal of Ecology (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1 May 2019), https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13109.

[2] ‘KPopper_Falsification’, n.d.

[3] A. F. Chalmers, ‘Epidemiology and the Scientific Method’, International Journal of Health Services 12, no. 4 (1982): 659–72, https://doi.org/10.2190/5d7c-ynq6-byum-4194.

[4] Pincelli Hull, ‘Life in the Aftermath of Mass Extinctions’, Current Biology 25, no. 19 (5 October 2015): R941–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2015.08.053.

[5] ‘Mange | Definition, Causes, & Facts | Britannica’, accessed 17 September 2022, https://www.britannica.com/science/mange.

[6] John B Mcdiarmid, ‘THEOPHRASTUS ON THE PRESOCRATIC CAUSES’, n.d.

[7] Hull, ‘Life in the Aftermath of Mass Extinctions’.

[8] Hull.

[9] Hull.

[10] Erkan Istanbulluoglu, ‘An Eco-Hydro-Geomorphic Perspective to Modeling the Role of Climate in Catchment Evolution’, Geography Compass 3, no. 3 (2009): 1151–75, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00229.x.

[11] BVetMed, CBiol, MIBiol, DZooMed, MRCVS, DACZM, RCVS Stephen J. Hernandez-Divers, ‘World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, 2005’, VIN.Com, 30 March 2015, https://www.vin.com/doc/?id=6694579.

[12] ‘Our Furry Friends: The History of Animal Domestication — Journal of Young Investigators’, accessed 17 September 2022, https://www.jyi.org/2012-february/2017/9/17/our-furry-friends-the-history-of-animal-domestication?amo_session=186112_1006.

[13] Mcdiarmid, ‘THEOPHRASTUS ON THE PRESOCRATIC CAUSES’.

[14] ‘Our Furry Friends: The History of Animal Domestication — Journal of Young Investigators’.

[15] Francis Galibert et al., ‘Toward Understanding Dog Evolutionary and Domestication History’, Comptes Rendus Biologies 334, no. 3 (1 March 2011): 190–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRVI.2010.12.011.

[16] Galibert et al.

[17] Galibert et al.

[18] Galibert et al.

[19] Carlos A. Driscoll et al., ‘The near Eastern Origin of Cat Domestication’, Science 317, no. 5837 (2007): 519–23, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139518.

[20] ‘Our Furry Friends: The History of Animal Domestication — Journal of Young Investigators’.

[21] Tom Heikkinen et al., ‘Water Quality (/ Water / Water- Quality )’, Handbook of Hydrology 3, no. Rosborg 2015 (2016): 1–5.

[22] ‘The Domestic Cat: The Biology of Its Behaviour - Google Kitaplar’, accessed 29 September 2022, https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=GgUwg6gU7n4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA179&dq=cats+domestication+history&ots=V17J1Lf95f&sig=dEQtywsCY7d2oZxSoF4_lGxie5c&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=cats domestication history&f=false.

[23] Driscoll et al., ‘The near Eastern Origin of Cat Domestication’.

[24] ‘Augur Anxieties in the Ancient Near East | Ancient Divination and Experience | Oxford Academic’, accessed 29 September 2022, https://academic.oup.com/book/32442/chapter/268784621.

[25] Peter Mitchell, ‘The Archaeological Study of Epidemic and Infectious Disease’, World Archaeology 35, no. 2 (2003): 171–79, https://doi.org/10.1080/0043824032000111353.

[26] ‘[Disease and Treatment in the Old Testament] - PubMed’, accessed 29 September 2022, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12269376/.

[27] Christopher E Cosans and Michael Frampton, ‘History of Comparative Anatomy’, ELS, no. December (2009), https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0003085.

[28] ANGELA CASSIDY et al., ‘Animal Roles and Traces in the History of Medicine, c.1880–1980’, Bjhs Themes 2 (2017): 11, https://doi.org/10.1017/BJT.2017.3.

[29] Kathleen C. Blits, ‘Aristotle: Form, Function, and Comparative Anatomy’, Anatomical Record 257, no. 2 (1999): 58–63, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990415)257:2<58::AID-AR6>3.0.CO;2-I.

[30] Blits.

[31] Stéphane Schmitt, ‘Studies on Animals and the Rise of Comparative Anatomy at and around the Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences in the Eighteenth Century’, Science in Context 29, no. 1 (2016): 11–54, https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988971500037X.

[32] Pausas and Bond, ‘Humboldt and the Reinvention of Nature’.

[33] AlfredRussel Wallace and Charles Darwin andAlfredRussel Wallace, ‘Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, Volume I William Buckland Volume III Geology and Mineralogy, Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, Volume II William Buckland Volume IV Omphalos Philip Gosse Volume V On the Origin OfSpecies Charles Darwin Volume VI Palaeontology Richard Owen Volume VII Man’s Place in Nature Thomas Henry Huxley Volume VIII The Geological Evidences Ofthe Antiquity OfMan’, 2003.

[34] AlfredRussel Wallace et al., ‘No Title’, n.d.

[35] Riccardo Nicolosi, ‘The Darwinian Rhetoric of Science in Petr Kropotkin’s Mutual Aid. A Factor of Evolution (1902)’, Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 43, no. 1 (1 March 2020): 141–59, https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.201900023.

[36] Jeff Short, J E Kinnear, and Alan Robley, ‘Surplus Killing by Introduced Predators in Australia-Evidence for Ineffective Anti-Predator Adaptations in Native Prey Species?’, n.d., www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon.

[37] Nicolosi, ‘The Darwinian Rhetoric of Science in Petr Kropotkin’s Mutual Aid. A Factor of Evolution (1902)’.

[38] ‘KPopper_Falsification’.

[39] Christopher J. Corkett, ‘Some Notes on the Aristotelian Origin of the Distinction between a Falsificationist’s and Verificationist’s View of Science: Together with Corrections to My Earlier Account’, 31 October 2012, https://dalspace.library.dal.ca//handle/10222/15671.

[40] Valerie Racine, ‘Georges Cuvier (1769-1832)’, 10 July 2013, https://hpsrepository.asu.edu/handle/10776/5914.

[41] Roman Frigg, Erica Thompson, and Charlotte Werndl, ‘Philosophy of Climate Science Part II: Modelling Climate Change’, Philosophy Compass 10, no. 12 (1 December 2015): 965–77, https://doi.org/10.1111/PHC3.12297.

[42] Stephen K Donovan, ‘History of Palaeontology’, ELS, 2001, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0003097.

[43] Blits, ‘Aristotle: Form, Function, and Comparative Anatomy’.

[44] Blits.

[45] Blits.