Is the age of the empowered employee over?
[Photo: kate.sade/Unsplash]

Is the age of the empowered employee over?

Welcome to?Fast?Company?Daily, our daily newsletter on?LinkedIn, featuring a free article selected each day by our editors as well as a roundup of great advice on careers, hiring, innovation, and technology.

Visit?fastcompany.com?for our top stories and breaking news.?


We're thrilled to be back at SXSW in person at the?#FCGrill?this year. Follow along our?live events Twitter?and other social channels for live coverage of the action, and hear from our amazing?lineup of panelists.


In case you missed these stories...

  • Sophie Beren, CEO of The Conversationalist, is on a mission to unite the world, one difficult conversation at a time.
  • Red Wing made a real-life version of Mario’s work boots, hand crafted from stitch to mushroom-infused sole.
  • Van Leeuwen’s weird-sounding Hidden Valley Ranch Ice Cream is a concoction made for social media.
  • Daylight saving time starts tomorrow. While most of us don't have a choice but to spring forward an hour, this University of Washington professor makes a compelling case for never turning the clocks forward or back.
  • A new analysis of media mentions shows male leaders get to be “strong” and “innovative” while women in similar positions are described as “young.”

Is the age of the empowered employee over?

By Julia Herbst

The Great Resignation seemed to peak in November 2021, when a?record 4.5 million workers?quit their jobs in a single month. Desperate to retain employees, companies were scrambling. They offered more flexible work. They conducted surveys about company culture. How about more?employee recognition?programs??Four-day workweeks??Pet insurance?

Sure, some of the attempts to retain hires were ham-fisted. Company swag and lunchtime yoga don’t stop people from heading for the door in a tight labor market, especially if they feel underappreciated (or under-compensated). But the wave of new perks and focus on company culture?did?signal that employees were gaining more control, and employers were listening. (To some degree, at least: Income inequality has likely?only increased?over the past few years.)??

Now, more than a year later, as the country’s economic outlook has soured, employee power is less certain. “The Bosses Are Back in Charge,” declared?The Wall Street Journal?recently, pointing to the tens of thousands of workers who were laid off in January—and the likelihood that more painful cuts still loom. (Fast Company?also explored this topic on?The New Way We Work?podcast.)

At the same time, companies are pushing their remaining employees to get back into the office. Among those that have announced return-to-office mandates are Twitter (at least 40 hours per week), Disney (at least four days per week, starting in March), and Goldman Sachs (five days per week). A recent?Resume Builder survey?found that 90% of companies are planning to bring workers back at least part-time in 2023.?

While some employees are happy to return to their workplaces, research?suggests?that there’s a gap between how employers and employees feel about remote work, with managers pushing for more in-person time than what individual contributors would prefer. When Amazon CEO Andy Jassy announced recently that employees should be spending a “majority of the time” back in offices starting May 1, workers quickly?launched a petition?opposing the mandate.?

When employees do come into the office, they “want to feel like there’s a return on investment,” says J.P. Gownder, VP and principal analyst on Forrester’s Future of Work team, noting that workers don’t want to clock in simply to justify their employer’s downtown lease or to engage in some sort of?inscrutable “culture-building” effort. But with continuing layoffs, many are finding themselves less able to push for flexibility in terms of where and when they work.

In an effort to rein in budgets, companies are also cutting benefits—often the same ones they touted during the Great Resignation. According to a?2022 survey?by the Society for Human Resource Management, the number of U.S. organizations offering additional maternity leave (beyond the legal minimum) dropped from 53% in 2020 to 35% in 2022. Companies offering additional paternity leave also fell, from 44% in 2020 to 27% in 2022. Johnny C. Taylor Jr., president and CEO of SHRM,?told?Fortune?in August that employers were saying, “The job market is softening, so we don’t have to offer these super-competitive benefit offerings anymore.”

No business leader exemplifies this shifting dynamic more than Elon Musk, whose top priority when he took over Twitter last fall seemed to be wrenching power away from workers. He’s done it ruthlessly, in requiring employees to both show up in person and to work?more, period. After laying off thousands of workers, Musk?struck a bleak tone?in his first email to staff, banning most remote work (which he later was forced to walk back), and even installing makeshift bedrooms in Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters in a bumbling attempt to boost productivity.?

Though Musk is an outlier, he’s also an influencer, and other business leaders have been watching him closely. Musk’s actions move the CEO “Overton window,” in terms of what other chief executives feel they can get away with, Gownder says. In a column from December,?New York Times?technology writer Kevin Roose?cites?several high-profile leaders who have publicly praised the billionaire business magnate’s approach, including Netflix’s Reed Hastings.?

In the meantime, Musk and others have continued to push back against organized labor. Tesla recently fired a group of New York-based employees who were attempting to form a union just one day after they went public with their plans. (The company?claims?the firings were not retaliatory.) Starbucks, which, like Amazon, has experienced a wave of organizing,?has been slow-walking negotiations?with unionized stores.

Does this mean the age of the empowered employee is over? Are we all doomed to return to a pre-pandemic era that glorified hustle culture, rigid 9-to-5 (and then some) workdays, and limited workplace perks and protections??

A closer look at the full economic picture suggests that the situation is not as dire as it may seem. Despite?high-profile layoffs?and lingering inflation, the current U.S.?job market is strong, with a staggering 517,000 jobs added in January, and the lowest unemployment rate since 1969. Research also shows that tech workers—the majority of those affected by layoffs so far—are still very much in demand and?quick to be rehired. In fact, many companies are?still struggling?to find enough highly skilled talent to fill their open roles.

Despite pushback from corporate leadership, the organized labor movement is also showing signs of growth coming out of the pandemic. Interest in unions?is rising, especially?among younger workers. In the 2022 fiscal year, the National Labor Relations Board?saw?a 53% increase in union representation petitions compared to the year prior. Today, employees are?increasingly looking to unions?to gain power in their workplaces, even in traditionally nonunionized industries, like tech and cannabis. “Workers [are] taking matters into their own hands, trying to look for local solutions in their own workplaces and their own industries,” Sherer says.

Unions offer a means to protect workers and express their discontent about decisions made by leadership—a feedback mechanism that became particularly important during the pandemic. In 2022, worker demands focused on better pay, additional health and safety measures, and better staffing. It’s a list that reflects “the challenges workers have faced since the beginning of the pandemic,” according to Johnnie Kallas, project director of the Cornell-ILR Labor Action Tracker, in a recent interview with?Fast Company. With mass layoffs and economic anxieties front and center these days, it’s unlikely we’re going to see an end to this sort of interest any time soon.?

More broadly, the pandemic has led to a fundamental reckoning about how, where, and even why we work. A good number of people—including some forward-looking employers—realize that a more flexible mentality around the integration between “work” and “life” is possible (and even desirable) to cultivate productive and engaged workers.?

During the height of the pandemic, chief people officers were almost exclusively focused on employee well-being, according to Didier Elzinga, CEO of Culture Amp, an employee experience platform used by employers like McDonald’s, Oracle, and SoulCycle. Now, Elzinga says, their attention is shifting: “What’s happened in the last six months is that a lot of organizations [are thinking] ‘Well-being is still important, but it can’t be my only focus.’”?

Instead, companies are asking “Who’s creating impact? What are we doing to keep those people? How are we looking after those people?” he says. With tightening budgets, leaders may not have the freedom to offer every benefit or perk under the sun. But employee engagement still matters, even if it’s more narrowly focused on how to retain and support high-performing workers.?

After so much death and social isolation, many of us want our work to have more meaning. Burnout and “quiet quitting” have not gone away—even with a less certain economic forecast making workers more cautious, and executives more bold. And retaining talent has become more important than ever. Business execs might find Musk’s management style tempting in the short term, but they’d be wise to remember that workers have long memories—and this moment of economic uncertainty won’t last forever.


Follow us on?LinkedIn,?Twitter,?Instagram,?Facebook,?TikTok, and?Medium.

Jeffrey Lackey

Global Talent Executive | Board Member | Talent Acquisition Thought Leader and Innovator | Led teams to hire >1,000,000 people | Tech / AI / Automation Enthusiast | Host of ‘Growing Your Business with People’

1 年

Wow - while I genuinely believe that the intersection of people and profit is required, I do also believe they can and should go hand-in-hand - a virtuous cycle! This does not mean enabling entitled workers to feel their needs and wants are more important than the purpose of the company. It also does not mean that bosses need to be generous to a point of absolving themselves of their fiduciary responsibility. It does mean that their is opportunity for smart leaders (and smart money) to discover where organizational purpose inspires us to do great things and the rewards and incentives are shared with those who made these commitments (and often times sacrifices) and contributions! A CEO of a Fortune 50 company and I spoke. He told me “go to your lowest paid front line workers who have contact with customers. Learn what it takes to not only do their job but even in some cases just get to the job! Get down below the 10k foot ceiling and understand what level of commitment it takes for them to serve your customers. If you don’t walk away humbled, grateful and with a new sense of resolution to appreciate, recognize and reward employees (as well as removing unnecessary barriers), then maybe you should not be a leader!”

Zakaria Khan

Business Owner at TKT home made mosla products

1 年

Great share Fast Company

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Fast Company的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了