After the coal-to-gas conversion, the combustion cost remains high. Is it true that switching to a biomass combustion machine can save half of it?

Affected by the new crown pneumonia, the whole country is shrouded in the haze of the virus. Angels in white have turned into soldiers in white to fight the disease with all their might. The country has not relaxed its work on environmental governance. As companies resume work one after another, in addition to epidemic prevention and control, environmental governance is still one of the key tasks.

The price of the Industrial Revolution was at the expense of the environment, and it took Western countries decades to manage the atmosphere. After China’s economy took off, it also began to take action by the whole people to comprehensively control the atmosphere. In order to control the atmosphere, the country has implemented a coal-to-gas policy and comprehensively restricted the use of coal. After switching to natural gas, the atmospheric environment has been significantly improved, but the combustion cost remains high, causing many companies to complain. Now everyone is looking forward to whether there can be a combustion method that can meet environmental protection requirements and save costs. Therefore, biomass The burning method began to enter everyone’s field of vision. However, many people still have doubts about whether the biomass burning method can save money. I will give you an example and comparison below for your reference.

Take a 10-ton boiler as an example, the heat required is 6 million kcal/hour, and the annual work is 7200 hours (other energy-consuming equipment can be calculated by referring to the heat energy demand)

Using coal: the coal consumption is 1500kg/h, the unit price is 800 yuan/ton, the combustion cost is 1200 yuan/hour, and the annual combustion cost is 8.64 million yuan;

Use of natural gas: the consumption is 800m3/h, the unit price is 3.5 yuan/m3, the combustion cost is 2,800 yuan/hour, and the annual combustion cost is 20.16 million yuan;

Using biomass pellet fuel: the usage amount is 1700kg/h, the unit price is 800 yuan/ton, the combustion cost is 1360 yuan/hour, and the annual combustion cost is 9.79 million yuan;

Using biomass wood chips: the usage amount is 1800kg/h, the unit price is 400 yuan/ton, the combustion cost is 720 yuan/hour, and the annual combustion cost is 5.18 million yuan;

To sum up, the combustion cost of biomass pellet fuel is slightly higher than that of coal, and more than 50% lower than that of natural gas; biomass unformed fuel, such as wood chips (building formwork, shavings, etc.), sawdust, bamboo chips, etc. , the combustion cost can be saved by about 40% compared with coal, and more than 70% compared with natural gas.

?

Haiqi environmental protection biomass burner is used as a special equipment for biomass fuel. A set of 6 million kcal equipment generally invests no more than 300,000, but it can save tens of millions more than natural gas every year. Save millions.” So there is no need to worry about whether switching to biomass burners to burn biomass fuel instead of natural gas can save money, it will definitely save money.

I will make a series of Q&A, the next one is:Q&A12：Does the biomass burner have a long service life? How long can it be used for?, if you are interested, you can follow me Or contact me: [email protected]#biomassenergy #biomassburner #burner