Aesthetic Elitism in Photography

Photography is everywhere. It’s one of the most accessible art forms, allowing anyone with a camera—or even a phone—to capture moments and tell stories. But despite this openness, some people insist that certain types of photography are more valuable or “better” than others. This is what we call aesthetic elitism: the idea that some styles, techniques, or subjects are superior, while others don’t count as “real” art.

For example, photographs taken with expensive film cameras or created using traditional darkroom methods are often seen as more artistic. Meanwhile, a photo snapped on a smartphone or a picture from a family album might be dismissed as too casual or amateurish. This way of thinking tries to draw a line between “high” art and everything else.

But the beauty of photography lies in its ability to be for everyone. It’s not just for professionals or for those following strict rules about what’s considered “art.” It’s for anyone who sees the world in a unique way and wants to share it. By saying that only certain kinds of photography matter, aesthetic elitism limits the creativity and diversity of the medium.

The truth is, all types of photography have value. A polished portrait might hang in a gallery, but a blurry snapshot of a child laughing or a street scene captured in the moment can hold just as much meaning. Every photo tells a story, whether it’s perfect or not.

Photography doesn’t need to fit into a narrow definition of art to be important. Its real power comes from its ability to connect us—to freeze time, share experiences, and let us see the world through someone else’s eyes. When we embrace all kinds of photography, not just the “elite” versions, we honor what makes the medium so special.