Aerial Precision: LiDAR versus Photogrammetry for Drone Mapping

Introduction- Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, have gained significant traction in the field of aerial surveys due to their speed, safety, and cost-effectiveness. They offer GIS (Geographic Information System) professionals a powerful tool for conducting topographic surveys over large or inaccessible areas with unparalleled accuracy and efficiency compared to traditional methods. This results in reduced survey costs and alleviates the workload for field specialists. Choosing the right surveying and mapping system is crucial in this context. Interestingly, this process involves integrating technologies developed over a century apart, all aimed at enabling precise and efficient measurements.?

Early Days- The concept of permanent photography emerged in the early 1820s and evolved gradually. By 1840, a French surveyor proposed utilizing photographs to create topographic maps, eventually leading to the coining of the term "photogrammetry" in 1867. Today, photogrammetry involves capturing multiple 2D images and stitching them together to create accurate 3D representations, albeit with certain limitations such as time consumption and inability to penetrate vegetative canopies. In 1961, Hughes Aircraft introduced the commercial use of lasers, marking a significant advancement. Subsequently, the development of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) systems addressed the limitations of photogrammetry. LiDAR employs a pulsing laser to record distances based on light reflection, creating precise 3D point clouds when combined with GPS receivers. This technology offers enhanced penetration capabilities, significantly improving survey adaptability and accuracy. LiDAR finds diverse applications, from satellite tracking to aiding space landings, and has become widely adopted as a precision survey tool. The miniaturization of LiDAR technology has facilitated its integration with UAVs and drones for aerial surveys, leading to a surge in its usage across various applications. The global market for LiDAR in mapping is projected to exceed $4 billion by 2026.

Difference b/w Lidar & Photogrammetry-

A neutral assessment of both photogrammetry and LiDAR reveals distinct characteristics. Photogrammetry is relatively cost-effective and provides visually appealing representations and sampling data for small areas, albeit with a longer processing time. In contrast, LiDAR offers high accuracy, rapid processing, vegetation penetration, and the ability to produce colorized point clouds. Colorized LiDAR point clouds are increasingly utilized for creating 3D basemaps in a cost-effective manner, although the initial investment in LiDAR technology is considerable.

However, viewing photogrammetry and LiDAR as separate entities is overly simplistic in the current technological landscape, where drones are being equipped with increasingly advanced capabilities. Many LiDAR payloads now incorporate cameras, blurring the distinction between the two technologies. Thus, mastering both photogrammetry and LiDAR may be necessary, as they often converge in their applications.

From a practical standpoint, the choice between photogrammetry and LiDAR depends on the specific task and a concurrent cost-benefit analysis. For instance, photogrammetry may be preferable for tasks like inspecting high walls in mines, where visual details are crucial. Conversely, LiDAR excels in scenarios requiring volume calculations and terrain analysis beneath tree canopies.

Both technologies have significantly enhanced operational productivity over the years. Photogrammetry, in particular, has been instrumental in saving time compared to traditional survey methods. It produces full-colour 3D representations with high accuracy, often utilizing post-processing kinematics (PPK) and ground control points (GCPs) for improved precision. However, advancements in equipment now allow for minimal use of control points, enhancing efficiency, especially in industries like oil and gas.

Corridor mapping, facilitated by photogrammetry, accelerates data collection and post-processing, particularly in sectors like oil and gas. Additionally, the availability of diverse product ranges from various manufacturers fosters price competition in the drone market, making photogrammetry accessible to small businesses with limited capital resources.

A common misconception about LiDAR technology is that it is complex and difficult to use, as well as costly. However, the complexity of LiDAR lies in its ability to deliver high-quality results. The main challenge lies in ensuring the quality of the raw data fed into the LiDAR system. If the sensors or parameters are not set correctly, the results may be of poor quality, following the principle of "Garbage in, Garbage out." Yet, when the workflow and integration are well-executed, processing LiDAR data is often easier and faster compared to photogrammetry.

LiDAR has gained popularity due to its capability to extract data from environments where photogrammetry falls short, such as vegetated areas where ground measurement is necessary. Additionally, LiDAR excels in measuring narrow objects like pipelines and power lines, which may be challenging for photogrammetry. While photogrammetry may take several hours to generate data, LiDAR can accomplish the same task within an hour.

Lidar & Photogrammetry- Pros & Cons:

Applications- One significant application of LiDAR is in natural disaster scenarios, where rapid data collection through debris is crucial. LiDAR can swiftly provide vital information, offering a distinct advantage in time-sensitive situations. Moreover, the choice between photogrammetry and LiDAR depends on the surface type being surveyed. For example, for surveying straight metallic structures like power lines or cell towers, photogrammetry may not be effective due to limited color differentiation. In contrast, LiDAR's ability to differentiate colors enhances survey accuracy, and it can also be utilized effectively in underwater and nighttime surveys.

LiDAR also simplifies data processing compared to photogrammetry. With LiDAR, the end product is generated directly, eliminating the need for processing large volumes of raw data. Integration of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), and LiDAR in post-processing further enhances speed and accuracy. Advanced LiDAR systems, equipped with high-quality sensors and cameras, can achieve accuracy levels down to 1 to 4 centimeters. These systems are particularly beneficial for professionals in construction, land development, engineering, surveying, and research, allowing for accurate data collection in less time and with fewer personnel compared to traditional methods.

The demand for LiDAR is growing globally, especially in regions like Indonesia, Africa, and Latin America, where industries such as mining, construction, and engineering rely on its capabilities. Even surveyors, who traditionally favoured photogrammetry, are increasingly interested in adopting LiDAR technology for its efficiency and accuracy.

Conclusion- In conclusion, the utilization of LiDAR as an onboard payload for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) presents a significant cost advantage over manned helicopters. Conversely, the lower initial purchase cost of photogrammetry makes it a preferred choice for many surveying companies and engineering firms, particularly for routine surveys. However, advancements in technology are gradually making LiDAR more affordable, thus increasing its attractiveness over time.

Despite the functional and technical disparities between photogrammetry and LiDAR, the selection of the surveying process ultimately depends on the specific task at hand. Photogrammetry is ideal for tasks such as comparing construction site progress over time, while LiDAR excels in applications like building inspections, contour analysis, powerline examination, oil and gas operations, and volumetric evaluations.

Regardless of the chosen method, UAV or drone-based surveys offer integrated solutions and have become indispensable for cost-effective and time-saving surveying services.

Furthermore, research conducted by the international ResponDrone Project highlights the general public's lack of awareness regarding the use of drones by first responders in emergency situations. While there is some negative feedback regarding privacy and noise concerns, there is also an understanding of the potential benefits drones can offer in emergency response scenarios. Recommendations from the project include implementing distinctive identification and informing residents about drone flights and drills in advance to increase public acceptance of drone technology in emergency situations.

Overall, the findings emphasize the need for increased public education and awareness regarding the types, capabilities, and applications of drones, particularly in emergency response contexts, as they are still relatively new and unfamiliar to many people.

#drones #dronetechnology #droneinnovation #LiDAR #dronemapping #photogrammetry #droneapplication #droneforgood #3Dmapping #topography