Advertising's Edifice Of Nonsense
There is evidence all around us that advertising is in a downward spiral, characterized by...
- Consumer disgust with advertising
- Loss of confidence in agencies
- Massive confusion by brands about how and where to advertise
- Widespread belief that advertising has become less effective
- Uncontrolled fraud and corruption
One of the reasons for this nosedive is that the ad industry is in a cycle of stupidity that it can't seem to extricate itself from.
The longer the silly fantasies of online advertising go unchallenged, the more entrenched they become. The more entrenched they become, the more they seem axiomatic. The more they seem axiomatic, the less willing people are to challenge them. The less people are willing to challenge the childish nonsense that marketers have to come to accept as fundamental to their strategies, the further the ad industry will deteriorate.
Here is some of the foolishness that brands have come to believe, and that few are willing to challenge...
- Consumers want to "join the conversation" about brands, and co-create with brands, and become brand ambassadors by sharing their enthusiasm for brands
- Consumers are smitten with "brand love"
- "Personalized" advertising (meaning advertising delivered by ad tech) is more "relevant" and therefore more effective
- More credibility is given to dubious "research" that supports these fantasies than is given to actual facts
So let's have a look at some down-to-earth reality (which I have stolen from a previous post) and see how it aligns with the platitudes of online advertising.
First, I want you to think about your refrigerator. Think about all the stuff that's in there: The cheese, the juice, the jelly, the butter, the beer, the soda, the mayonnaise, the bacon, the mustard...
Now think about your pantry. The cereals, the beans, the napkins, the flour, the detergent, the sugar, the rice, the bleach, the paper towels...
Next your medicine cabinet. The toothpaste, the pain relievers, the shampoo, the soap, the band-aids, the deodorant, the cosmetics...
Now your closet and dresser. Your socks, your underwear, your shirts, your pajamas, your swim suit, your t-shirts, your sweaters, your jeans, your sneakers...
Now your garage. The battery, the tires, the wiper blades, motor oil, gasoline, the air filter, the muffler...
Now answer these questions:
? Do you “share branded content" about any of this stuff?
? Do you feel "personally engaged" with these brands?
? Do you "join the conversation" about any of this stuff?
? Do you ever "co-create" with any of these brands?
? Do you feel like you are part of these brands' "tribes" or "communities?"
Now answer this: If you don't, why in the fucking world do you believe anyone else does?
Bob Hoffman is creator of The Ad Contrarian blog and author of BadMen: How Advertising Went From A Minor Annoyance To A Major Menace.
People "engage" with Coca Cola? What exactly does that word engage mean? But they sound like sad bastards to me
Should have Played Quidditch for England
6 年Thanks Bob, nobody looks at Ads anymore, only the people who sell them.
Writer, editor, team leader. #NUJ
6 年Who keeps bleach in the same cupboard as their rice?? ?:) I agree with the broad sentiment expressed here. But plenty of people do 'engage' with the brands they buy from - Coke, Levis, Coors, Volvo, and a whole lot more. Such examples are the rarity though. This is a real example of a recent comment from a B2B client I work with:?'Even when a store is closed, you keep driving sales with your content continuously being displayed and thoughts placed in the customers mind.' Who knows, maybe that's how things work on whatever planet they're from. I've also met with businesses who've said things like "Apple doesn't do social. Apple doesn't consult its customers. We want to be a successful brand like Apple, so we'll ignore our customers too." The point about new takes on old tactics (whether it's your social strategy, your use of ad-tech or whatnot) is that you'd better have put the hours in building a brand people recognise and products they want to buy first.
Vice President - Corporate Strategy & Pricing @ LK Packaging
6 年Personalized ads, especially retargeted ads do objectively perform better than similar ads running via different targeting. They also tend to deliver a better user experience since the advertiser can slow-sell a prospect across multiple touches vs being forced to close a lead on the first try. I rarely see interruption marketing on retargeted ads to the same degree I see it on contextual and RON buys. So yes, the world is better due to personalized ads.....
Caregiver at Always Best Care Senior Services
6 年Agree, very well said!