Adversary Centric Cybersecurity: Intelligence-Driven Defense

As cybersecurity professionals, our mission is no longer just about building taller walls to keep threat actors out. The evolving threat landscape requires a shift in our focus—from reducing attack surfaces, fortifying perimeters, and responding to incidents as they occur. While these strategies are foundational, they are no longer enough. To truly defend against today’s threats, we must recognize that the perimeter is just one part of a much larger equation. It's time to rethink how we approach cybersecurity, emphasizing threat intelligence and community sharing.

The Current Approach: Defense at the Perimeter

For years, the dominant cybersecurity strategy has been centered around reducing the attack surface and protecting an organization's perimeter. This includes implementing firewalls, endpoint detection, vulnerability management, and controlling access to sensitive systems and data. The logic behind this approach is simple: the fewer weaknesses an adversary can exploit, the harder it is for them to infiltrate the network.

This defensive mindset also emphasizes quick response—reacting to incidents, remediating vulnerabilities, and ensuring minimal downtime after an attack. By reducing the number of potential entry points and keeping systems patched and secure, organizations aim to prevent breaches from happening in the first place.

However, this approach focuses heavily on securing the organization’s environment, treating the network as a fortress. The problem is that modern adversaries are constantly finding new ways to break through, whether by exploiting unpatched systems, leveraging zero-day vulnerabilities, or using social engineering techniques. As the attack surface grows with cloud computing, remote work, and third-party integrations, it becomes impossible to fully secure everything.

A security posture that focuses primarily on reducing the attack surface is inherently reactive and often insufficient in today’s threat landscape. While reducing the attack surface is essential, it has its limitations. The growth of cloud services, remote access, and mobile devices means the attack surface is constantly expanding and securing it all is a monumental challenge.

Moreover, advanced threat actors now leverage zero-day exploits, insider threats, and sophisticated lateral movement techniques, allowing them to bypass traditional defenses. Relying solely on perimeter security and vulnerability management often leads to a reactive posture—organizations respond only after an attack is underway, which can be too late to prevent significant damage.

The Need for Adversary Engagement

To address the limitations of the current environment-focused approach, it’s crucial to shift our attention from mainly securing the perimeter to understanding and engaging the adversary. Adversary engagement means actively focusing on how attackers operate, understanding their tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), and using this knowledge to disrupt their activities early in the attack chain.

Engaging the adversary involves more than scenarios of waiting for an attack to happen and watching it on a honeypot environment. It requires threat intelligence and proactive monitoring of the behaviours and activities that typically precede an attack.

The Power of Threat Intelligence

Threat intelligence plays a critical role in adversary engagement. It’s about gathering, analyzing, and using data on cyber threats to anticipate and defend against attacks. It involves collecting, analyzing, and applying information about known malware, adversary tactics, zero-day vulnerabilities, and attack infrastructure. But it’s not just about collecting information; it’s about understanding how adversaries operate and using that knowledge to predict their next move.

From my experience in incident response, one recurring theme is the predictable nature of threat actors. They often reuse the same artifacts, infrastructure, and methodologies—not because they lack sophistication, but because their basic techniques still work effectively, and they are opportunistic. Why expose advanced capabilities when simpler methods achieve the desired results? For advanced persistent threats (APTs), this approach is even more strategic. They avoid unnecessarily revealing their full arsenal, opting to use basic techniques as long as they remain effective, thereby keeping their most sophisticated tools hidden until necessary.

Consider it from an opportunistic perspective as well, if you were targeting 100 companies a day, would you develop new tools and set up fresh infrastructure each time? Likely not—you would opt for reuse, maximizing efficiency. While targeted attacks aimed at specific objectives like stealing trade secrets do occur, the majority of cybercrime is financially motivated. Most threat actors don’t care who they compromise, as long as they can achieve their goal, which tends to be financial gain. As cyber defenders, this is something that we can take advantage of by sharing threat intelligence, they contribute to a collective defense model, where insights gained from one attack can help others prevent similar incidents at other organizations. The collaborative sharing of attack data, indicators of compromise (IoCs), and tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) creates a stronger defense ecosystem. As adversaries continue to collaborate, defenders must do the same.

This intelligence-driven approach allows defenders to keep their eyes on the attackers—not just the environment they’re protecting. By focusing on the adversary, organizations can understand how attackers infiltrate systems, move through networks, and exploit weaknesses. Knowing the attacker’s playbook allows defenders to anticipate their moves, develop countermeasures, and disrupt attacks before they succeed.

Shifting the Focus: Eyes on the Adversary

To effectively engage adversaries, cybersecurity teams need to broaden their visibility beyond their environment. This means monitoring for unusual activity, not just within their systems, but across the wider threat landscape. Threat hunters and analysts should actively seek out patterns of behaviour that align with known adversary TTPs, such as lateral movement, credential harvesting, or the deployment of remote access tools.

Adversary engagement is a mindset shift. Instead of passively waiting for an alert to trigger, security teams take the initiative to discover potential threats early. Advanced tools, such as User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) and machine learning-driven detection systems, can help identify subtle deviations in behaviour that indicate malicious activity. By establishing a baseline of normal behaviour and monitoring for deviations, defenders can catch attacks before they escalate.

Building Proactive Cyber Defense

Engaging the adversary requires more than just technology; it requires a change in how we think about defense. Rather than treating security as a static barrier, it must become a dynamic process that evolves alongside the threat landscape. This means investing in threat intelligence, actively monitoring adversary activity, and sharing information across industries.

By focusing more on understanding how attackers operate, gathering intelligence on their methods, and engaging them early in their campaigns, organizations can disrupt attacks before they cause significant harm. The future of cybersecurity lies not in building bigger walls, but in actively hunting and neutralizing the attackers who seek to breach them.

In conclusion, the time has come to move beyond a solely environment-focused cybersecurity strategy. While reducing the attack surface is still important, it must be complemented by a focus on engaging adversaries and understanding how they operate. By leveraging threat intelligence and actively monitoring for early indicators of attack, organizations can stay ahead of evolving threats and prevent breaches before they unfold.

?