Why Traditional Media Still Matters (Even If It’s Fun to Trash Talk)
AdTechGods The Refresh Newsletter

Why Traditional Media Still Matters (Even If It’s Fun to Trash Talk)

I love charts. Always have. Always will. I can’t make one if my life depended on it, but I sure as heck love to stare at them endlessly and come up with my own interpretations.

IAB Survey

Here it is:

We all expect the advertising industry to continue its shift towards digital-first, multi-channel strategies, but what we may not be aligned on is how we will? maintain traditional media where it makes sense. The digital industry loves to bash traditional media but it isn’t going away anytime soon. It’s just fun to trash talk IMHO.

The key challenges for brands will be achieving cross-platform integration and measurement to optimize spend across increasingly fragmented channels.

1. Dominance of Digital:

  • CTV, Social Media, and Paid Search are expected to dominate ad spend, with CTV leading the way at an 18.4% growth rate. This shows that brands are increasingly focused on reaching audiences through video and interactive formats, which aligns with consumer trends. No brainer.
  • Podcasts are growing steadily, which indicates a shift towards more immersive and personalized content experiences. Advertisers recognize the value of direct audience engagement and intimate formats like audio, where trust and attention are higher. Have I told you about our podcasts? Visit Marketecturemedia.com

We will likely see more innovation in digital advertising formats, with an emphasis on integrating data-driven targeting and cross-device capabilities (like reaching users across CTV, mobile, and desktop). Brands will focus on creating cohesive multi-channel experiences that connect with consumers in various contexts. Makes sense, right? Let’s hope we can pull it off.

I'll dive into The Rebound of Linear, Traditional Media and Diversification Across Digital Formats but you only get access by subscribing to The Refresh Newsletter.

Sign up for the Refresh Newsletter

?? Piotr Pr?dkiewicz ??

marketing analytics | data-driven UA and growth

2 个月

This chart is nice but makes no sense. Don't make decisions based on it. Sum up all the changes, and you'll find that it's not a zero-sum game. We're talking about % which are most likely to be a distribution in this case. In the case of Aug 24 they sum up to 104%. In the case of Nov 23 they sum up to 82,2%. Either there are some pieces missing that are positive of 17,8 % in Nov 23 and -4 % in Aug 24, or the data is something else, like % change against the budgets from previous period. If it's distribution: Why would you have a negative distribution? Do you mean to take the budget out of a channel and get reconciled / charged back on top? If it's change from previous period: What's the previous period? It can be Aug 24 vs Nov 23 for the orange data series, but what's with the yellow?

Sarah Caputo

Founder @ Fraction Method / Fractional CMO and Executive-Level Marketing Consultant / Chief Digital & Marketing Officer / MarTech Client Advisory Board Member

2 个月

Big data visualizations fan! (And fellow nerd)

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了