Is Adjusting Scriptures appropriate?

Adjusting the holy Bible to reflect geographical and cultural Theology:

Redaction criticism, or Redaktionsgeschichte, is a relatively recent development in Biblical (and Bhagavad gita) studies away from God’s intended word and message. Here's a breakdown of the key points:

·??????? Origin: Developed in the mid-20th century by Biblical scholars, primarily focused on the New Testament, especially the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke).

·??????? Purpose: To analyze how the authors (or redactors) of these texts edited and shaped their source materials. This can reveal the redactor's theological perspective and intentions.

·??????? Debate on Usefulness: There's ongoing debate about the value of redaction criticism, particularly among evangelical Christians who prioritize the literal interpretation of the Bible. Some argue it undermines the historical accuracy of the text.

Criticisms of Redaction Criticism:

·??????? Overemphasis on Editing: Critics argue that the method focuses too much on editorial changes, neglecting the original meaning of the source material.

·??????? Subjectivity in Interpretation: The redactor's motives and theology are open to interpretation, leading to potential biases in analysis.

·??????? Limited Historical Context: Focusing solely on editorial changes might neglect the broader historical context in which the texts were written.

Despite these criticisms, redaction criticism offers valuable insights:

·??????? Understanding Textual Development: It sheds light on how the New Testament texts evolved and were compiled.

·??????? Authorial Intent: It helps us understand the redactor's perspective and the message they intended to convey, (away from God’s intended word)

·??????? Comparative Analysis: It allows scholars to compare how different gospel authors used the same source material.

While redaction criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte) is a valuable tool for analyzing the development of texts in the New Testament, applying it directly to the Bhagavad Gita presents some challenges. Here's why:

• Limited Scope: Redaktionsgeschichte was originally developed for analyzing texts with multiple authorship or compilation from various sources, like the synoptic gospels. The Bhagavad Gita, while having complex origins and potential interpolations, is traditionally attributed to a single author – Vyasa – within the larger Mahabharata epic.
• Dating Challenges: Unlike the New Testament with a relatively defined timeframe, the Bhagavad Gita's composition is a matter of ongoing debate. Estimates range from 4th century BCE to 1st century BCE, making it difficult to pinpoint specific redactors or editorial stages.
• Oral Tradition: The Gita's roots lie in oral tradition, passed down for centuries before written versions emerged. This makes identifying clear editorial interventions challenging.

However, this doesn't mean redaction criticism is entirely irrelevant to the Bhagavad Gita. Here are some alternative approaches:

• Textual Variants: Examining the over 7000 manuscripts of the Bhagavad Gita can reveal variations and potential redactions made during copying or transmission. This can shed light on how the text evolved over time and across different regions.
• Internal Analysis: Inconsistencies within the text, like shifts in style or content, might indicate later additions or redactions. Scholars can analyze the text itself to identify potential editorial changes.
• Comparative Mythology: Comparing the Gita with other Hindu texts and epics can highlight possible borrowings or adaptations, suggesting editorial choices in shaping the final version.

Here's a possible breakdown of how these approaches could be applied in 7000 versions of the Bhagavad Gita:

1. Categorize Variants:?Group the manuscripts based on significant textual variations.
2. Date and Locate:?Attempt to date and geographically locate each variant group.
3. Analyze Variations:?Identify inconsistencies or additions within each group that might indicate redaction.
4. Comparative Analysis:?Compare variants with other Hindu texts to see if specific passages show signs of editorial influence.
5. Reconstruction:?Based on the analysis, attempt to reconstruct a potential "original" version of the Gita, acknowledging the limitations of such an endeavor.

It's important to remember that the Bhagavad Gita's strength lies in its diverse interpretations across different Hindu traditions. Redaction criticism can be a tool to understand how the text developed and was received over time, but it shouldn't overshadow the richness of its ongoing relevance in Hinduism.

Potential Christian missionary editing of the Bhagavad Gita:

While there have been Christian interpretations of the Gita throughout history, there's no evidence of widespread redaction (editing) by missionaries with the intent of Christianizing the text. Here's a breakdown:

·??????? Respectful Interpretations: Many Christian scholars have studied and interpreted the Bhagavad Gita with respect for its Hindu context. They might highlight themes of universal values or find parallels with Christian concepts, but this isn't the same as redacting the text itself.

·??????? Missionary Goals: While some missionaries might have aimed to convert Hindus, their primary methods often involved preaching or writing their own theological works, not altering existing Hindu scriptures. Redacting a complex text like the Gita would be a challenging and potentially counterproductive approach.

Redaktionsgeschichte and the Bhagavad gita:

As discussed earlier, applying redaction criticism in its original form to the Bhagavad Gita is difficult due to its unique textual history. However, the concept of textual variants and editorial influence remains relevant.

·??????? Hindu Reform Movements: During the 19th century, Hindu reform movements like Arya Samaj produced their own interpretations of the Gita, emphasizing certain aspects and potentially downplaying others. This reflects a form of editorial influence within Vedic Sanatana Hinduism itself.

·??????? Colonial Era Influences: During British colonial rule in India, some English translations of the Gita have been influenced by Victorian-era sensibilities and the core text itself was demonstrably altered by ‘paid’ Brahmin editors/translators to suit the perpetuity of colonial material needs and ambitions.

Fortunately Srila Prabhupada from ISKCON obtained an original Sanskritam text and laid out his path for a Bhakti generating authentic translation as opposed to 700+ scholarly redacted translations.

?

Image: Bhagavad Gita as It Is.?

Conclusion:

Changing the scriptures has its own challenges. Redacting scriptures is not necessary. Sticking to the original word of God may be a better approach.