Adjustable parts. Why I avoid them when possible.
Source: TI

Adjustable parts. Why I avoid them when possible.

Adjustable parts will eventually require adjusting. Those words of wisdom were given to me some decades ago. There are some examples of where adjustable parts were used but they are not really necessary in many cases with modern components. Sometimes there is no choice, of course, but my view is that those occasions should be few and far between.

In a previous post, I mentioned that many university and college labs appear to have a stash of 741 opamps and while they were really good for their time (it was the first 'superstar' component according to many) it is not something I would be using for a modern design.With an input offset voltage (Vos) of up to 5mV at 25C, any precision designs with high gain really required us to use the offset null terminals. Modern amplifiers of modest frequency response, such as the ADA4522 have astounding specifications when compared to those older devices. The single part has the capability of nulling the offset but in the majority of cases it is simply not necessary. Interestingly, the 741 is still in production and features quite large in some of the equipment I work with to this day.

RF historically had many adjustable parts, particularly inductors and capacitors in filters and tuned circuits and while those type of system exist today, precision RF can be achieved without them. The advent of frequency synthesis and ultra stable oscillators have, in many cases, obviated the need for them. Synthesis has been with us for several decades although the parts available today are far better than those of even 10 years ago.

That is not to say adjustable parts are going to disappear; for a simple, low cost circuit they can be ideal but if I am designing a precision circuit where cost is not a major issue, some extra circuitry can achieve results equal to or better than those with adjustable parts.

For circuits that require calibration, it might seem counter intuitive to eliminate adjustable parts, but by using a microcontroller and a lookup table, circuit errors can be characterised and corrected in software. This is particularly true in test equipment but is not limited to that market. Precision hardware can be realised this way for many areas of electronics. With a bit of thought, a system can actually be made to be self-calibrating using this method.

On the offset null, nulling can give a false sense of security as it does nothing to address the temperature dependence of the circuit and this is true of many circuits; adjustable parts also have their own temperature dependencies.

Adjustable parts are often used to vary the brightness of LEDs (as an example) but PWM drive of the device yields the same result (provided the |PWM is fast and produces no visible flicker) without the wasted power inherent in resistive loads.

In many cases practical alternatives to adjustable parts exist and when used properly mean that production items should never have to be, well, adjusted.

Comments are welcome as always.

Learned, thanks for sharing, Peter ??

回复
Ernesto Gonzales

Sr. Analog IC Designer

2 年

Nice, reminds me of my electronic instrumentation professor telling us how, back in the day, they had to calibrate the crap out of a product before the demo. Now a lot of precision and stable circuitry are normal for many desgins.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Peter Smith CEng的更多文章

  • Professional Partnerships

    Professional Partnerships

    So who are these partners that enhance our capability? Field Application Engineers for a start. Sometimes they are…

    1 条评论
  • Job hunting in difficult times

    Job hunting in difficult times

    Every job and client I have had since 2004 has been via LinkedIn, including the latest one where I started in the…

    6 条评论
  • The Analog Greats that shaped Electronics

    The Analog Greats that shaped Electronics

    I remember when I first started formally designing circuits in the early 80s and they were primarily analog although…

    17 条评论
  • When an engineer is not an engineer

    When an engineer is not an engineer

    Over the years, the term Engineer has been devalued particularly in the UK by those who really are not engineers…

    6 条评论
  • Electronics Designers needed

    Electronics Designers needed

    I have been relatively quiet of late; that is because I am building an electronics design capability for a…

  • The road to hell is paved with good intentions

    The road to hell is paved with good intentions

    Or why government green initiatives usually go spectacularly wrong. There have been numerous such initiatives, the most…

  • The most Misused and Misunderstood terms in Electronics.

    The most Misused and Misunderstood terms in Electronics.

    Having just seen an article from a major EDA company that should know better, I figured we could amuse ourselves by…

  • The quiet revolution in IDEs and compilers

    The quiet revolution in IDEs and compilers

    Over the last 20 years or so, a quiet revolution has taken place, led by (many might say) the advent of GCC and other…

    6 条评论
  • Integrating new technology; the low risk approach.

    Integrating new technology; the low risk approach.

    The board in the picture was a huge step for the company I was with at the time, and due to the fear of new…

  • We have moved!

    We have moved!

    The view from my creative space is above. After a hectic couple of days moving myself, the better half and 4 cats over…

    5 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了