Adjacency The New Buzz Word?

Adjacency The New Buzz Word

The newest conversation taking front stage today is that if we expect to grow we must pursue adjacent business opportunities.  Is this really the path to growth? I suspect the answer is more complicated than the question suggests. 

Regardless to whom I speak with these days the word “adjacency” finds its way into the conversation. I guess I'm not surprised, after all, the past few years have been spent looking for relevant ways to invigorate growth, as all inelegant life realizes that staying the course of traditional copy is not sustainable.

But, what really is an adjacent business. Some say that if the reoccurring revenue business model is core to the business model, it’s adjacent. Others say that similar technology is the clear sign the business is natural for us to just enter and succeed with. I’ll suggest that these are both just too simplistic to adopt. I’m persuaded that we need to consider all the nuances of the business we are considering. What is the sales process like? What knowledge is necessary? What levels of support is required? Can your infrastructure support the diversion? Does your business systems support the financial requirements? Will you need a new staff? Will this be a distraction for your sales, service and admin team? Frankly, I could go on, but you get the picture.

Let's explore some of the popular areas of opportunity and see if that adjacency is really a fit for our existing core business.

Managed Network Services: The opportunity getting the most attention today is that of Managed Network Services, and who could argue it’s adjacency. Let's however, look at the accounts that make up your base. What percentage of our accounts are 250 employees or less? If the answer is a substantial percentage then this could be a good fit. That said, the chances are that the sales process you have in place for these accounts is the most transactional. Managed services are account centric. This alteration to our organization is not insignificant. The existing sales force handling these accounts is likely the least qualified to support this business process. It’s not that they are poor salespeople it is just that the methods of account development are very much a team process as opposed to the “my account” mentality of this sales group. So it is likely that you must consider a specialized sales force. This is far from an insurmountable problem but if we fail to address it from the onset it could create a path to distraction and failure. Infrastructure may, however, be a hill that keeps growing as the business does.  

The IT services business is one that requires a significant amount of investment capital. Consider that the value proposition for this vertical is that the customer does not have to make the constantly changing investments in an ever-changing business, and can focus on their core business. This means that they expect you to make those investments and stay ahead of that ever-changing curve. For this reason, I recommend teaming up with a company such as Continuum. It is important to hold the investments down while you are learning a new business, and keeping up with the most current “cloud” technology can be all consuming. Amazon is putting out over 300 new “cloud” products per year. Staying on top of this is an almost impossible task, and it is only one aspect of what you would need to do.  

There are those that suggest that acquiring an MSP is the answer but, acquisitions where the disciplines, not core can be difficult to integrate. I believe that acquiring should be left until after you have established yourself in the market. Even if you have already started down the managed services path reaching out to a partner can help lubricate the mechanisms and reduce the investments. In the very near term, most companies under 100 employees will be utilizing the cloud as their network and you need a partner that is already there. 

This is a fast moving business and going it alone can be a course to frustration and capital drain. Finding the right partner is the key to success in this fast-paced business. It can allow you to learn while you develop and support customers… profitably. 

3D Printing: This so-called adjacency is anything but. The only thing 3D has in common with the traditional print is the word “Print”, everything else is different. The sales process is different, the justifications are different, the language is different and the sales cycle can be extremely elongated, especially by copy standards. There are those that will tell you that 3D will change the world. I agree. I do not agree that everyone is properly positioned to participate in that transformation, and as far as utilizing your existing structure to grow nothing could be further away. If you’re thinking about heading into this market make sure you are fully committed and have the money to weather the road ahead. Don't even try to utilize your existing sales structure. 

Labeling: The technology is identical but the sales process and justification for acquisition are not. This is another step into the world of manufacturing. It may not be as dramatic as 3D, but it has nothing to do with the office. So, there is a legitimate question as to whether it is an adjacent business. The first step should be to review your account base. Do they use labels and is that use critical to their business. Breweries, wineries, and medical centers fit the profile. Almost everyone has some of these types of accounts but is it enough to be a sustainable business. If so you might want to consider the move. The sales process is transactional so there is little change to your existing sales process. Most of your infrastructure will be compatible but you will absolutely require sales specialization.

Production Print: I really question if this is more of an extension of our core business opposed to an adjacency. Every dealer can and should move into this area. If they haven't done so should speak with their OEM today. This is not to say that you don't need to make investments and the knowledge necessary to compete is more demanding than the office, but the customers may very well be the same. Most importantly the support is there from your OEM supplier. The opportunity exist is all your accounts. One of the mega trends in our industry has been that the ability to process more complex jobs closer to the point of need. This is creating more opportunity for production print. The best pace to turn for her here is our OEM they have a specialist on staff and can support your actions to ensure that your investments make sense. Can you use your existing sales force? Maybe, but that will depend on their skill sets and willingness to change some practices. It can defiantly create a new step in the career path.

Managed Print Services: Most dealers have abandoned this golden opportunity, or do it only defensively. It is a shame. The problem with this adjacency is that we got off on the wrong foot. In the early days of MPS we were told this is natural for all of us; just a different approach. Nothing could have been further from the truth. This is a large account opportunity with a lot of moving parts. Like Managed Network Services, MPS is an account based sales process. The major difference in this area is that it is not about the machines, but bout the base. One of the huge benefits of MPS, if done correctly, is the decline in the help desk traffic. Nearly 50% of all help desk calls are printer related. Bringing the right level of support and knowledge to an account offers a much smoother running operation and a huge relief for the CIO. The number of resources to turn to for help in this market are dwindling, but a great place to start is with the MPSA. This organization has a complete line of condensed knowledge for this vertical and is reasonable to join. 

There are more adjacent market opportunities but regardless of the disciple, there is no substitute for knowing your organization and customer base and make sure they’re compatible with the new business structure. The most important advice I can muster is, don't be sold. Understand what you know and what you don’t know, Be honest with yourself. Are you looking for something new because you can’t make your existing situation work? If so, get back to basics first before you consider anything new. Whatever new you are considering will require investment, and if you’re existing business isn't sound, strengthen it first. Then enter the adjacency with your eyes wide open not because someone has a new machine to sell you.

We've been down that road before.


Kevin Guy

Strategy and Business Development Leader - Environmental Goods and Services

5 年

Ed McLaughlin I always enjoy your hard earned insights into growth challenges, real barriers and opportunities. The KARE approach to customer analysis is alive and kicking - K = customers we must keep, A = customers we want to attain, R = customers that we may be able to recover and E = customers that we can expand with (new services, products, locations)

Larry Kirsch

Expert Copier Consultant at Kirsch Copiers

5 年

Nice report

Gregory Abel

Stay Tuned, Jobseekers...Stay tuned!

5 年

Great article, Ed! I don't know much about your industry but appreciate the approach of being honest with yourself regarding your own internal capabilities.? The questions you pose are great examples and could apply to many situations. Great perspective.? ?

Mihai Ionescu

Strategy Management technician. 20,000+ smart followers. For an example of a strong nation, look where European cities are bombed every day by Dark Ages savages. Slava Ukraini! ????

8 年

Interesting analysis, with good conclusions, especially for those who have read (and understood) Chris Zook's 'Beyond the Core' and 'The Essential Advantage', by Paul Leinwand and Cesare Mainardi. Something to add: The (a) 'Adjacent Market Entry' and (b) 'New Market Entry' are two where-to-play Strategic Choices groups that have nothing in common. This is why: (a) means 'new products/services offered to (mostly) the same/existing customers' (b) means 'the same/existing products/services (or slightly adapted) offered to new customers'. In the Ansoff Matrix, (a) is somehow equivalent to the 'Product Development' quadrant, while (b) is somehow equivalent to 'Market Development'. This article is about (a), therefore the analysis of the five alternatives presented has to clarify if the respective adjacent moves are targeting (mostly) the same/existing customers, or not. If not, ask yourself the question posed in their book by Leinwand & Mainardi: 'Do you have the Right-to-Win [in this new market]?' What does this mean? It means that you need to have the smallest possible gaps between your existing Capabilities System and the one required to provide & support a way-of-Doing (defined by your how-to-win Strategic Choices) that will be preferred by the targeted new customers, for their Jobs-to-Be-Done. Why? Because otherwise you'll venture into the 'Diversification' quadrant of the Ansoff Matrix and you'll move against the Right-to-Win. In other words, you might win, but the odds are against you, unless you acquire a company that has the required capabilities that you're missing, before entering into the new market (new customers) with products or services that you've never produced/delivered before. Since I've mentioned the 'Jobs-to-Be-Done', read Clayton Christensen's new book 'Competing against Luck', if you haven't already done so :) .

Alex L.

Helping make the world a better place through manufacturing excellence.

8 年

Good read. Enjoyed the article! A reminder to look before you leap into the industry buzz.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ed McLaughlin的更多文章

  • It's Not About the Data It's About the Knowledge

    It's Not About the Data It's About the Knowledge

    Many people have asked me, “Does the industry need another DCA?”. My response is, “It depends on your expectations.

    7 条评论
  • Are you and your Accounts Aligned?

    Are you and your Accounts Aligned?

    As an industry we are really very good at understanding the internal metrics that lead to a well-run business and thus…

    1 条评论
  • Succeeding In A "Zero-Sum" World

    Succeeding In A "Zero-Sum" World

    I recall an educational meeting I attended early in my career. A respected professor from a prestigious University told…

    10 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了