ADHD and Mental Capacity
A person sat in a chair, with question marks above their head. (Credit: Bing Images)

ADHD and Mental Capacity

Introduction?

“That’s a silly decision.” “You can’t do that.” “You always forget.” If you live with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), you have likely heard these remarks. Whether you are someone with ADHD, care for someone with the condition, or are a professional working with individuals affected by it, understanding ADHD in the context of mental capacity is essential. This article aims to clarify whether individuals with ADHD can make their own decisions, grounded in legal principles and practical insights.?

What is ADHD??

ADHD is a neurodevelopmental condition characterised by persistent patterns of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. These symptoms vary in severity and manifest differently across children and adults. The three subtypes of ADHD are:?

  • Inattentive subtype: Accounts for 20-30% of cases.?
  • Hyperactive-impulsive subtype: Accounts for around 15% of cases.?
  • Combined subtype: Accounts for 50-75% of cases (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).?

Diagnosis is clinical, based on the criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), requiring a comprehensive assessment by a qualified professional. In the UK, the prevalence of ADHD in adults is estimated at 3-4%, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 3:1 (Faraone et al., 2006). ADHD impacts various life aspects, such as:?

  • Relationships: Challenges with attention and impulsivity can strain personal relationships.?
  • Finances: Impulsivity and poor planning may lead to financial difficulties.?
  • Employment: Organisational difficulties and time management issues can affect job stability (Barkley, 2015).?

Despite these challenges, individuals with ADHD often exhibit high intelligence. Studies have shown that many people with ADHD possess above-average intelligence and are capable of exceptional problem-solving skills and creativity (Antshel et al., 2007). However, these cognitive strengths do not negate the potential difficulties in decision-making processes, especially in complex or high-stakes situations.?

A chalk board, written is the words Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. A hand holds a blue piece of chalk. (Credit: Bing Images)

What is Mental Capacity??

Mental capacity, as defined under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005), refers to the ability to make decisions. The MCA 2005 outlines key criteria for assessing mental capacity:?

  1. Understanding: Can the individual comprehend the information relevant to the decision??
  2. Retention: Can they retain this information long enough to make the decision??
  3. Use and Weighing: Can they use or weigh this information as part of the decision-making process??
  4. Communication: Can they communicate their decision, whether verbally, in writing, or by other means??

These criteria ensure that individuals are supported to make informed decisions. Decisions covered by mental capacity assessments include medical treatments, financial matters, and personal care arrangements. For example, understanding and retaining information about a medical procedure is crucial for informed consent, while weighing financial options is essential for sound financial planning.?

A yellow background, laid upon the background is a white note, a black ben, an illustration of a human head with cogs inside grinding, the scales of fairness and a book. The note reads "Mental Capacity Act". (Credit: Bing Images)

Does ADHD Impair Mental Capacity??

The relationship between ADHD and mental capacity is nuanced. ADHD symptoms can impact decision-making abilities, particularly in scenarios requiring sustained attention, complex information processing, or impulse control. However, having ADHD does not inherently mean an individual lacks mental capacity.?

Importantly, mental capacity can fluctuate. Various factors, including stress, fatigue, and emotional state, can influence an individual's capacity at different times. For example, a person may temporarily lack capacity due to alcohol consumption or after sustaining an injury. This principle applies to everyone, including individuals with ADHD.?

Under the MCA 2005, capacity is assessed on a decision-specific basis. An individual with ADHD may have the capacity to make some decisions but not others, depending on the context and their current state. For instance, while an individual with ADHD might manage daily personal care decisions effectively, they might struggle with complex financial decisions due to difficulties in information processing or impulsivity.?

Take, for instance, the scenario of deciding what to have for tea. For many with ADHD, this simple decision can become a monumental task due to indecisiveness. However, put the same individual in a situation of crisis, and they often shine. Research suggests that people with ADHD can be incredibly decisive and effective in high-pressure environments due to their ability to hyper-focus and think quickly on their feet (Brown, 2005).?

Consider the hypothetical case of Jane, an adult with ADHD. Jane can decide what to have for dinner or when to take her medication. However, when faced with decisions about her financial investments, she struggles to weigh long-term consequences and may act impulsively. A capacity assessment would determine if Jane needs support to make these decisions.?

Relevant Case Law?

The application of the MCA 2005 has been clarified in various case law. Notably, A Local Authority v RS [2020] EWCOP 29, where the Court of Protection examined whether a man with ADHD and other mental health conditions had the capacity to make decisions about his residence and care. The court emphasised the need for tailored assessments considering the individual’s specific circumstances and the nature of the decision. It reiterated that capacity assessments should be decision-specific and that individuals should be supported to make their own decisions whenever possible (Cowan, 2020).?

Another significant case is Re A (Capacity: Social Media and Internet Use: Best Interests) [2019] EWCOP 2, which explored the capacity of a young adult with ADHD to use social media and the internet safely. The court ruled that although the individual had ADHD, it did not automatically mean he lacked capacity to make decisions about his online activities. The case highlighted the importance of assessing capacity in a decision-specific context, ensuring individuals are supported to make informed choices (Bevan Brittan, 2020).?

The Court of Protection (Credit: Bing Images)

Legal Framework and Protections?

The MCA 2005 provides a framework to protect individuals who may lack capacity, with key principles including:?

  • Presumption of Capacity: Every adult has the right to make their own decisions unless proven otherwise.?
  • Support to Make Decisions: Individuals should receive all practicable help before concluding they cannot make decisions.?
  • Right to Make Unwise Decisions: Making an unwise decision does not mean a person lacks capacity.?
  • Best Interests: Decisions made on behalf of someone lacking capacity must be in their best interests.?
  • Least Restrictive Option: Any intervention must be the least restrictive of the person's rights and freedoms.?

Additionally, the Equality Act 2010 protects individuals with disabilities, including those with ADHD, against discrimination. Employers, educational institutions, and service providers must make reasonable adjustments to accommodate the needs of individuals with ADHD, ensuring they are not disadvantaged compared to their peers. Adjustments may include providing additional time for tasks, creating structured environments, or offering tailored support (Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2010).?

Have ADHD? Know Your Rights!?

Individuals with ADHD have rights under the Equality Act 2010, including protection from discrimination and entitlement to reasonable adjustments. It is essential to understand these rights and advocate for them effectively.?

In the workplace, reasonable adjustments might include:?

  • Flexible working hours.?
  • Regular breaks to improve concentration.?
  • Access to organisational tools and support.?

In educational settings, adjustments could involve:?

  • Extended exam time.?
  • Access to quiet study areas.?
  • Tailored learning plans.?

Regarding mental capacity, procedures under the MCA 2005 ensure decisions made on behalf of someone lacking capacity are in their best interests. This involves consulting with family members, carers, and other relevant parties, and considering the least restrictive options. Advocacy services are vital, providing guidance and ensuring the individual’s voice is heard in decision-making.?

Practical steps for individuals with ADHD to advocate for their rights include:?

  • Seeking reasonable adjustments in workplaces and educational settings.?
  • Accessing legal advice to understand and protect their rights.?
  • Using support and advocacy services to navigate complex legal and personal decisions.?

Conclusion?

The interplay between ADHD and mental capacity requires a nuanced understanding of both medical and legal perspectives. While ADHD can affect decision-making abilities, it does not necessarily equate to a lack of mental capacity. Understanding rights and legal protections enables individuals with ADHD to advocate effectively, ensuring their needs and preferences are respected. Awareness and advocacy are crucial; those with ADHD should seek support and exercise their rights to maintain their autonomy and well-being.?


References?

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.?
  2. Antshel, K. M., Hier, B. O., & Barkley, R. A. (2007). Executive Functioning Theory and ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 11(2), 125-137.?
  3. Barkley, R. A. (2015). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment. Guilford Publications.?
  4. Bevan Brittan. (2020). Case summary: A Local Authority v RS [2020] EWCOP 29. Retrieved from https://www.bevanbrittan.com/insights/articles/2020/case-summary-a-local-authority-v-rs-capacity-2020-ewcop-29/?
  5. Brown, T. E. (2005). Attention Deficit Disorder: The Unfocused Mind in Children and Adults. Yale University Press.?
  6. Cowan, K. (2020). Case law and the Mental Capacity Act: A Local Authority v RS. Mental Health Law. Retrieved from https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/media/2021-06_MHA_and_MCA_case_law_sheet.pdf?
  7. Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2010). Equality Act 2010: Guidance. Retrieved from https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/equality-act-2010?
  8. Faraone, S. V., Biederman, J., & Mick, E. (2006). The age-dependent decline of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Psychological Medicine, 36(2), 159-165.?

Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute formal legal advice. The author is not liable for how this information is used. Always seek professional legal advice for specific situations.?

?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Thomas Cowburn的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了