Addiction 3 2 1 - Three Models, Two Diseases, One Choice
Which Do You Choose?
A Disease Model that stems from Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and espoused by many 12-step programs and participants. But, according to Ernest Kurtz, a well-known author and AA historian: “the closest the book Alcoholics Anonymous comes to a definition of alcoholism appears on p. 44, at the conclusion of the first paragraph of the ‘We Agnostics’ chapter, where we are told that alcoholism ‘is an illness which only a spiritual experience will conquer.’”(citation). Kurtz also quotes Bill Wilson (a co-founder of AA): “We have never called alcoholism a disease because, technically speaking, it is not a disease entity. For example, there is no such thing as heart disease. Instead there are many separate heart ailments, or combinations of them. It is something like that with alcoholism. Therefore, we did not wish to get in wrong with the medical profession by pronouncing alcoholism a disease entity. We always called it an illness, or a malady -- a far safer term for us to use.” George Valliant, MD compared alcoholism as a disease to cardiovascular illness as a disease in his acclaimed book “The Natural History of Alcoholism Revisited”. The model suggests addiction is a spiritual problem with a spiritual solution.
B Disease Model that states addiction is a disease that is Brain-Based or Biologically Based (BB). It states that “addiction is defined as a chronic, relapsing brain disease that is characterized by compulsive drug seeking and use, despite harmful consequences. It is considered a brain disease because drugs change the brain—they change its structure and how it works. These brain changes can be long-lasting, and can lead to the harmful behaviors seen in people who abuse drugs.” (NIDA). This model lends itself to a medical response usually through medications to “fix” permanently damaged neuropathways thought to be responsible for risk, reward, emotions, judgement, and decision-making. With it's emphasis on the repeated use of a chemical that interacts with brain, this definition may or may not be mapped onto addictive processes such as gambling disorder or sexual behaviors that involve repetitive behaviors rather than the repeated ingestion of a drug. Nonetheless, this model of addiction describes a medical problem with a medical solution.
C The Choice model of addiction, a favorite of some psychologists, is perhaps best described in the book by Gene Heyman “Addiction: A Disorder of Choice”. One of the main reasons why the concept of choice in addiction is so compelling is because most people who develop some form of mild, moderate, or severe addictive disorder stop their compulsive use without treatment. This is sometimes called “spontaneous remission” or “natural recovery”. As this article concludes: “Most drug abusers who had started using drugs by their early 20s appeared to gradually achieve remission. Spontaneous remission was the rule rather than the exception.” There is a body of literature that strongly supports the fact that most people stop using alcohol, drugs, nicotine as well as stop addictive behaviors without extensive use of 12-step programs, health providers, or treatment programs. This model of addiction asserts a psychological problem with a psychological solution.
Could it be that all models have something to offer and something lacking? Which do you choose? Perhaps (D) “All of the Above” is the correct answer if this was a multiple choice question! (Like/Comment Below)
Encouraging Autonomy Combats Demoralization
6 年Leaving out the Dr.'s Opinion - a chapter by a Medical Doctor -? in the program? of Alcoholics Anonymous (big book) - surprises me.? The Joe and Charlie model inspired by page xxviii in this chapter lays out the problem, solution and action required for the solution.? The model is simple and explains the other models mentioned here.? ?Is it biological?? Yes.? Is it mental?? Oh yes.? Are there choices?? Yes,? until choice is lost - the point of the model.? ?Defeating? the allergy (abstinence) and mental obsession (psychic change) results in recovery.? ? Treatment trumped causality at the time the big book was published,? and was beyond their reach anyway as noted by Dr. Silkworth - the author of the Dr.'s Opinion.?? I combined the above model - casually referred to as "the disease model"? with the latest perception research on a college campus.? Perception risk factors - hardwired factors that increase and/or decrease perception of both risk and benefit - match the mental and physical progression of addiction.? ?For 25% of a random population.?? This finding presented a huge problem.? What were the other 75% of the students doing?? ?Answering that question uncovered a difference.? A developmental difference.? ?A necessary and sufficient developmental difference.? Rick is right, something is missing.? Matt is right,? ?treat the cause.? Terence is right,? if the client understands the problem, solution and directions to recover - problem solved.? ?Prehab is the new rehab.? ?We don't have to wait for symptoms to diagnose.? Check it out.? www.duncanparkpress.com
Perrynationplatforms.com + B-F-L-Y Public Speaker's Practice Platforms in Franklin County ( Bunn - Franklinton - Louisburg - Youngsville )
6 年Great comparisons and each model has it's strengths and weaknesses. For me spontaneous remission worked however I think any number of combinations of models work for the individual who chooses a path or many paths to get the positive end results that is sought. Sort of remind me of all the religions, then in religions are denominations and in denominations are subdenominations, yet each group of people get what they need and it works for them spiritually. What works for some don't work for all, but it's good to have choices. Pick one dammit... Lol ??
Contact me at [email protected] for help with alcohol, drug or gambling problems.
6 年Very interesting, well articulated article. Thanks, Dr. Rick. I think Nower and Blaszczynski's Pathways Model (although usually applied to gambling addiction) has a lot of promise regarding other addictions. One of its useful ideas is that we are incorrect in using a cookie cutter (one size fits all) approach to treatment. Perhaps the causation should inform the treatment planning.