Adaptive Leadership In Crisis Response

Welcome to the ROT Newsletter by IAS

Learn how to get a higher return on your trust!

Thank you for reading this newsletter; each month, you will be exposed to opportunities and education that will increase your ability to get the “Return On Trust” you invest in your business and employees.

At IAS, we believe that by increasing trust, we will achieve our mission of reducing the number of small businesses that fail by 1%. Please join us on that mission by building trust.?

We hope you enjoy it, and please share this newsletter with those who might benefit.

Welcome to "When Leadership Styles Go Wrong".

In the next few ROTs, we will examine leadership styles and adaptive leadership principles and discuss how introducing adaptive leadership to your organization is pivotal for improving your business results.?

To get started, I will discuss two leadership styles: autocratic and laissez-faire. Both have positive and negative qualities. You can learn more about leadership styles, including their definitions. For today's sake, let’s discuss these crisis management and response approaches.

Example 1: Autocratic Response to Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

The autocratic leadership style can exacerbate crises quickly. This seems counterintuitive because quick, decisive decision-making is a good choice. Bear with me as we look at the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

From an outsider's perspective, let us consider the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, where? BP deployed an autocratic leadership style, which contributed to the worsening of the crisis. In this instance, decision-making was highly centralized, with limited input from on-site engineers and experts.

It appears that BP's upper management chose to centralize decision-making and ignore input in the hope of resolving the situation quickly. However, this choice resulted in a need for more transparent communication regarding the severity of the situation. Critical information needed to be adequately shared with the on-site teams, hindering their ability to comprehend the extent of the crisis and respond effectively. This top-down communication style contributed to a delay in recognizing the gravity of the oil spill, impeding prompt action and exacerbating the environmental and reputational damage.

The crisis management process at BP needed to tap into the expertise of on-site engineers with valuable insights into potential solutions. The reluctance to decentralize decision-making and involve those closest to the crisis site hindered the implementation of timely and innovative strategies to contain and mitigate the spill.

Using an autocratic style instead of a hybrid style of autocratic, servant, and pacesetter at Deepwater Horizon demonstrated how a lack of transparent communication and failure to involve key stakeholders can intensify a crisis. The rigid, top-down decision-making structure impeded adaptability and collaboration, escalating the situation rather than effective resolution.?

It is essential to realize that we must move fluidly between leadership styles to adapt to any situation's needs. My general rule is to assume that part of what I believe is wrong, so I listen to others to find the elements I need to be correct.

Example 2: Laissez-faire Response to the 2007 Financial Crisis

Consider an example of how a laissez-faire leadership style can worsen a crisis. During the 2008 financial crisis, certain financial institutions with laissez-faire leadership experienced exacerbated challenges.

Laissez-faire leaders are known for their hands-off approach, often delegating significant decision-making authority to subordinates. During the 2008 crisis, some executives adopted a laissez-faire stance in the financial sector, allowing various departments to operate with minimal oversight. This decentralized decision-making contributed to a lack of cohesive strategy in response to the crisis.

The laissez-faire leadership style's absence of clear guidance and oversight can result in conflicting actions and a fragmented organizational response. During the 2008 financial crisis, institutions with laissez-faire leaders faced challenges coordinating efforts to address systemic issues. The lack of centralized decision-making hindered the swift implementation of comprehensive measures to stabilize financial systems and restore confidence.

Furthermore, the laissez-faire approach can foster a sense of uncertainty among employees, as they may feel a lack of direction and support during a crisis. In the financial sector, for example, this contributed to a decline in morale and increased anxiety among staff, further hindering the organization's ability to navigate the crisis effectively.

The laissez-faire leadership style witnessed during the 2008 financial crisis exemplifies how a hands-off approach can lead to fragmented decision-making, lack of coordination, and decreased employee morale, ultimately contributing to the worsening of a crisis.

Let’s Get Adaptive

The contrast between the autocratic leadership style in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and the laissez-faire approach during the 2008 financial crisis highlights the importance of adaptive leadership in crisis management. A leader who can navigate between these styles, depending on the situation, is better positioned to achieve effective results.

In the case of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, an initial autocratic response was marked by centralized decision-making and limited input from on-site experts. However, the crisis response could have been more effective if leaders recognized the need for adaptability and shifted towards a more collaborative style, incorporating insights from the engineers and fostering transparent communication. A more inclusive decision-making process might have led to quicker problem recognition and innovative solutions to contain and mitigate the environmental impact.

Conversely, during the 2008 financial crisis, a laissez-faire leadership approach contributed to a lack of coordination and direction. If leaders had recognized the need for more assertive decision-making and implemented a more autocratic style in certain aspects of crisis management, they could have provided clearer guidance and coordinated efforts more effectively. This shift might have resulted in a more cohesive organizational response, addressing systemic issues more timely and strategically.

In essence, an effective crisis leader must be able to adapt their leadership style based on the nature of the crisis and the organization's specific needs. Depending on the circumstances, balancing elements of both autocratic and laissez-faire approaches enables leaders to leverage the strengths of each style and achieve more nuanced and effective crisis management outcomes.

Take Action

Elevate your organization's crisis resilience and leadership effectiveness with my proven management consulting training program. We offer a tailored approach, drawing from real-world examples and best practices to navigate the delicate balance between leadership, management, and process improvement.

Invest in strategic guidance that fosters innovation, collaboration, and long-term success—contact us today to discuss how to transform your organization's crisis response and leadership dynamics.

Custom Management Training Program Testimonial

Well, the big turning point was we weren't able to or felt like we had difficulty stepping away or leaving our business for more than a few days, maybe a week. We just wanted to have some structure and give our managers tools to help them execute their jobs so we can focus on growth.??

Since completing the program as a company, we’re more confident in our company's process. We now have employees who engage in creating the solutions for our business. As a team, we now focus on solutions. We went from telling people to improve to now focusing on how we as a team can solve the problems.?

We could not be more pleased with the results and would recommend this program to anyone business owner. The best investment you can make!?

Rachel, CEO of New Moon Beginnings

Upcoming Networking & Learning Opportunities

December Events

• Jewish Business Network Of Pittsburgh Happy Hour Dec. 20th

If you want to trust your business?

• To operate without you.
• Take the vacation without fear of it all falling apart
• To not have to pull all the levers and push all the buttons to make your business work
• To have employees that care about solving problems and not creating them?

Then schedule a free discovery call to see if the ROT Process is right for your business

If you found value in reading this, consider sharing this newsletter with a friend and remember to subscribe to stay current.