Adapting UX methods to context
It’s possible to adapt UX methods to context, and that has a number of advantages. I spoke about it recently with a UX contact of mine.?
Adapting methods is an improvisation skill. My contact explained to me that she thinks improvisationally at work because of her childhood background.
When my contact was growing up, her family didn’t have a lot of money. So they only bought food that was on sale at reduced price.?Recipe books weren't very useful, because her kitchen rarely had all the ingredients.
So when she helped out with the cooking, she learned to cook improvisationally without a recipe, based on whatever was in the house. She learned to think about cooking in a flexible and creative way. That resourcefulness stayed with her as a life skill.?
For some people, “improvisation” implies a disorganized and unjustified approach that leads to poor quality results.?
I mean improvisation in a different sense, as an intelligent and strategic way of adapting processes to context.?
You can adapt UX methods to a number of contexts, including the organization, team, project, development methodology and product management methodology. Contextual adaptation is valuable in two ways:
Here are some examples:
Contextual adaptation comes with a mindset of mental flexibility, autonomy and resourcefulness.
领英推荐
I’ve come to understand some of the obstacles to the improvisational mindset in the UX field:
1. UX isn’t taught as something you can adapt. UX designers are taught to be consumers of methodology rather than designers of methodology.?
2. There’s a lot to learn in UX methodology, and it takes many years just to get a feeling of control over the basics and familiarity with the friction points in methods.
At university I studied experimental psychology, where I learned to design scientific experiments. The methods don't have direct access to what’s happening in the participant’s mind. As a result, for each new research goal, you have to improvise indirect methods. And you need to improvise well, because that can make the difference between proving your hypothesis or not.
For each new scientific research experiment, the method is an ingenious customized solution to a difficult challenge. A method that works for one research question won't necessarily work for another.
Like my contact's background in cooking, my improvisation skills in experimental psychology transferred to my career. I always thought of UX methodology as a means that you adapt to your ends and your context.
We don't necessarily want everyone improvising and adapting UX methods. It's a skill in itself. Scientific researchers in training spend 8 years in university learning how to design methods well. I help teams and individual UX designers adapt their methods, but that's based on a lot of project experience figuring it out.
The compromise is to learn adaptive patterns that others have tried and succeeded with. You can also start bringing awareness to the friction points in your methodology. That will motivate you to start looking for adapted solutions.
UX Researcher | Human-Centered Design
3 年Good article. Reminds me of a time where some interviews initially scheduled with certain people got cancelled because these people had in-field emergencies. I ended up “street-talking” with similar roles as I was walking in the company. It allowed me to get some pieces of information from different people that I carefully glued together, accounting for context. It was completely improvised, not the best way of getting the info, but needed I order to move forward in challenging settings. This seems to me closely associated to what Creswell defines in his work as “Pragmatism”: the idea of using, mixing different methods in order to achieve your goal.
LifeAfterTech.info ???? & dcx.to - Strategist, author, coach, researcher, and designer finding & solving human problems. "The Mary Poppins of CX and UX"
3 年Very interesting.