The acronyms of anti-abuse in International Tax and their interplay

I am an Italian tax expert, so I am not a native English speaker, and every time I find myself studying international tax topics, or I must prepare a lesson on the same topics, I always feel a bit annoyed by continually coming across a series of acronyms. The acronym is certainly convenient, but it often lends itself to multiple interpretations, given that depending on the context in which we find ourselves, it can have different meanings. However, despite my personal annoyance, anyone who wants to study or delve into international taxation must become familiar with a series of acronyms, now widely used. Thus, when I read an article, I find some authors using them without even providing an explanation as to their meaning (they are now taken for granted). In the study of taxation, we encounter a series of rules aimed at curbing abusive phenomena, or "aggressive tax planning". These provisions are now commonly referred to exclusively by their acronyms and it is often easy to cause confusion. I thought that a short summary article might prove useful to clear up some confusion, particularly for those who, like me, are not native English speakers.

In international tax law, several key concepts and provisions work together to prevent tax avoidance and promote the fair taxation of cross-border transactions. These concepts include "Beneficial Owner," the "LOB Clause" (Limitation on Benefits), the "PPT Clause" (Principal Purpose Test), and "GAAR" (General Anti-Avoidance Rule). They are often found in tax treaties, bilateral agreements, and domestic tax laws. Here's an overview of how these concepts interact:

1. Beneficial Owner: Beneficial ownership is a fundamental concept that determines who is entitled to the benefits of reduced withholding tax rates on certain types of income under tax treaties. It focuses on identifying the individual or entity that has the ultimate economic interest in the income and the right to use and enjoy it. The concept of beneficial ownership helps prevent treaty abuse, such as treaty shopping, by ensuring that treaty benefits are granted to those with a legitimate connection to the income.
2. LOB Clause (Limitation on Benefits): The Limitation on Benefits (LOB) clause is a provision commonly included in modern tax treaties to prevent treaty abuse. It establishes specific conditions and requirements that taxpayers must meet to qualify for treaty benefits. The LOB clause often includes a "beneficial owner" requirement, meaning that to benefit from the treaty's reduced withholding tax rates, the recipient of income must be the beneficial owner of that income.
3. PPT Clause (Principal Purpose Test): The Principal Purpose Test (PPT) is another anti-abuse provision found in the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project recommendations and some tax treaties. The PPT clause allows tax authorities to deny treaty benefits if one of the principal purposes of a transaction or arrangement is to obtain those benefits in an abusive manner. If a transaction fails the PPT, the taxpayer may lose the benefit of reduced withholding tax rates or other tax treaty advantages.
4. GAAR (General Anti-Avoidance Rule): A General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) is a domestic tax law provision that gives tax authorities the authority to disregard transactions or arrangements that are deemed to be artificial or abusive and designed primarily for tax avoidance. GAARs are typically broader in scope than LOB and PPT clauses, as they apply to all domestic and cross-border transactions and are not limited to tax treaties. Tax authorities use GAARs to challenge transactions that may comply with the letter of the law but violate its spirit by seeking to achieve tax advantages that were not intended by the legislation.

The interplay among these concepts involves a multi-layered approach to preventing tax avoidance:

• Beneficial ownership ensures that only those with a genuine economic interest in income receive treaty benefits.
• LOB clauses set specific requirements that taxpayers must meet to access treaty benefits, including the concept of beneficial ownership.
• PPT clauses provide a safety net to address abusive treaty practices even if the specific LOB requirements are met.
• GAARs serve as a broad tool to address tax avoidance within a country's domestic tax laws.

In practice, tax authorities and courts may consider these provisions collectively when evaluating the legitimacy of a taxpayer's structure or transactions, particularly in cases where tax avoidance is suspected. It's essential for taxpayers and tax professionals to be aware of these provisions and their potential impact on international tax planning.

Marco Mosconi

?