Acoustic Impedance Inversion

Acoustic Impedance Inversion

https://www.dhirubhai.net/in/deric-c-4b820319/recent-activity/articles/

https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/rock-propertyseismic-inversionavo-deric-cameron-dltle/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seismic_inversion

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Acoustic-impedance-inversion-shows-that-low-acoustic-impedance-value-red-color_fig2_316445649

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/acoustic-impedance

Acoustic Impedance Inversion

In seismic exploration, acoustic impedance (the product of rock density and the speed of seismic waves through the rock) is key to understanding how seismic waves behave when they encounter boundaries between different rock layers. When waves hit these boundaries, some energy is reflected back to the surface, and the rest continues through. The differences in acoustic impedance between layers create these reflections, which are recorded in seismic surveys. However, the reflections alone don’t tell us much about the actual rocks—they only show contrasts between layers. To dig deeper and understand what’s really underground, we use acoustic impedance inversion to turn seismic reflection data into a model that reveals specific details about rock properties, lithology, and fluids like oil or gas.

Seismic Data and Why We Need Inversion

Seismic surveys generate a huge amount of reflection data, which show where changes in acoustic impedance occur—basically, where one type of rock meets another. This is useful, but it only tells us about the boundaries between different layers, not the properties of the rocks themselves. For example, a seismic reflection might show that there’s a boundary between sandstone and shale, but it can’t tell us how dense the sandstone is or whether the shale is porous. Inversion takes the raw reflection data and converts it into a more detailed picture, one that tells us not just where the layers are, but what those layers are made of.

Types of Acoustic Impedance Inversion

1. Post-Stack Inversion

This is the most common type of inversion. After collecting seismic data, the traces from many source-receiver pairs are stacked (combined) to improve clarity. Post-stack inversion then extracts the acoustic impedance from the stacked data. There are a few ways to do this:

  • Band-limited inversion: Seismic data naturally misses some low-frequency information. This method fills in those gaps to give us a more complete impedance model.
  • Sparse-spike inversion: This assumes that the subsurface is made up of a limited number of distinct reflecting layers, helping us generate sharp contrasts and high-resolution images of those layers.
  • Model-based inversion: We start with an initial guess (usually based on well data or geological knowledge), then refine the model step by step to better match the seismic data.

2. Pre-Stack Inversion

Pre-stack inversion is more advanced and works with seismic data before the traces are combined, keeping more detailed information about the angles at which waves hit the rock layers. This method allows us to uncover more rock properties, like shear impedance and the Vp/Vs ratio (the ratio of compressional to shear wave velocities), which can tell us more about fluid content, rock type, and fracture networks. Pre-stack inversion can be incredibly insightful, but it’s also more complex and requires higher-quality data and more computing power.

Key Aspects of Acoustic Impedance Inversion

1. Different Algorithms, Different Results

There are several ways to approach inversion, and each has its strengths:

  • Least squares inversion minimizes the differences between the seismic data and the predicted model to give us the best estimate of acoustic impedance.
  • Simultaneous inversion looks at multiple seismic attributes at once, capturing more complex relationships between different properties.
  • Bayesian inversion brings in prior knowledge—like what we already know from well logs or geological studies—along with uncertainty, to provide a range of possible answers instead of just one.
  • Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) is a more advanced and comprehensive seismic inversion technique that pushes the boundaries of what conventional acoustic impedance inversion can achieve. While acoustic impedance inversion focuses on converting seismic reflection data into impedance models by analyzing contrasts between layers, FWI goes further by using the full seismic wavefield (both reflected and transmitted energy) to create highly detailed subsurface models. It utilizes all available information from the seismic wavefield, including amplitude, phase, and travel times, to build a more accurate picture of the subsurface. I'll try to remember to do a small article on this and how FWI fits with Acoustic Impedance Inversion alone another time.

2. Well Data Helps a Lot

Well logs are like the ground truth for inversion. We can use them to calibrate the inverted seismic data, making sure that the model reflects reality as closely as possible. This cross-checking with well data improves the accuracy and usefulness of the final impedance model.

https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/well-ties-deric-cameron-55she/?trackingId=RpRXf3m9RDG02nuevaGYTw%3D%3D

3. Dealing with Uncertainty

Like any process in geophysics, inversion comes with uncertainties—whether it’s related to data quality, assumptions in the model, or limitations of the algorithms used. Quantifying these uncertainties helps geophysicists make better decisions. Using methods like Monte Carlo simulations, we can see a range of possible outcomes and assess how confident we should be in the results.

4. Beyond Oil and Gas

Acoustic impedance inversion isn’t just for finding oil and gas. It’s also used in:

  • Mineral exploration, where impedance contrasts can highlight mineral-rich zones.
  • Geothermal energy, where knowing rock properties helps us understand heat flow in potential geothermal reservoirs.
  • Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS), where inversion helps us assess how well a rock formation can store CO2 and ensure it won’t leak.

5. Real-Time Inversion

With advances in technology, real-time inversion is becoming possible during seismic surveys. This allows geophysicists to see results almost immediately and make informed decisions on the spot—whether that’s drilling a well, adjusting survey parameters, or rethinking the target area.

Applications of Acoustic Impedance Inversion

  • Reservoir Characterization: By mapping the rock properties, we can better understand the makeup of the reservoir—what kind of rock is present, how porous it is, and whether it holds oil, gas, or water.
  • Seismic Facies Analysis: Helps map geological features like channels, faults, and ancient reefs, all of which are important for resource exploration.
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration: Detecting reservoirs by identifying impedance contrasts that suggest the presence of oil, gas, or water.
  • Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR): Monitoring changes in the reservoir over time helps guide strategies to maximize recovery, such as identifying areas that may benefit from additional injection wells.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Acoustic-impedance-inversion-shows-that-low-acoustic-impedance-value-red-color_fig2_316445649

Why It Matters

Acoustic impedance inversion is a powerful tool that transforms raw seismic data into precise, actionable information, much like turning a basic x-ray into a detailed view of the body’s inner structures. In geophysics, this technique allows us to interpret the subsurface in greater detail, enabling better decisions about where to drill, how to manage reservoirs, and even how to locate ideal sites for renewable energy projects like geothermal or wind farms. By mapping the subtle differences in underground formations, inversion techniques provide insights into rock properties, fluid content, and the structural layout of the Earth’s layers. This depth of information has become essential, as it equips geoscientists with the clarity they need to make accurate assessments and informed choices. With inversion, seismic data goes beyond raw signals to reveal the story beneath the surface, ensuring we approach exploration and resource management with the utmost precision and understanding.

In the end, acoustic impedance inversion transforms seismic data into a powerful guide, helping us uncover hidden details beneath the Earth’s surface and make confident, well-informed decisions in exploration and resource management.

https://www.dhirubhai.net/in/deric-c-4b820319/recent-activity/articles/

Disclaimer

The content discussed here represents the opinion of Deric Cameron only and is not indicative of the opinions of any other entity, Deric Cameron may or may not have had affiliation with. Furthermore, material presented here is subject to copyright by Deric Cameron, or other owners (with permission), and no content shall be used anywhere else without explicit permission. The content of this website is for general information purposes only and should not be used for making any business, technical or other decisions.


Atul Borthakur

Domain Expert - Exploration at Oil India Limited

2 周

Very good understanding

回复
Ayodeji Alabi

GEOSCIENTIST|Geotechnics|Geophysics|Geology|Machine Learning Enthusiast

3 周

My publication speaks volumes about the subject matter. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13202-019-0720-z

回复
Julius ADESUN, MSc, EMBA

CPG | Exploration | Development | Subsurface Resources Management

1 个月

Thanks for sharing. It is also expected a calibration with the local geology of a layered impedance at well location is done.

Deric Cameron

Passionate Geophysicist | Explorationist | Seismic Interpreter | Seismic Processing QC | Seismic QI | Data Science | AI | CCUS | Wind | Hydrogen | Energy Transition | Life Long Learner | Mentor | Strategic Thinker

1 个月

Thank you again Brian. Great contribution to my post as always…

回复
Brian Schulte

President Tesseral Ai | Focused on delivering industry-best solutions to your critical problems especially with AI and machine learning.

1 个月

Acoustic Impedance should be done on the AVO intercept which is the linear projection to the zero offset stack. If the intercept is not available then the near offset stack should be used. This comes back to the fact that Acoustic Impedance is the inversion of the reflection coefficient or as Deric Cameron said “density and P-wave velocity.” It does not have shear in it which makes it elastic. Some will invert the full stack, since it is all they have, and it may not match with the well data. This is due to AVO. With class 3 or bright spots Nears and Fars are about the same in impedance so this methodology works good for a class 3 AVO. It is when we get into Class 2, 2P and 1 that it changes. What we expect with Acoustic Impedance (AI) is a drop in the velocity which reflects the hydrocarbons or an increase in porosity. Hydrocarbons and increase in porosity go hand-in-hand. In a way I am emphasizing to get angle stacks and the AVO attributes intercept and gradient to do your work. Some maintain it should be the full stack but this comes back when we had only 12 fold. We should also utilize the 5D interpolation because this methodology is done before migration to prevent noise being generated off of holes in the coverage.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了