More Accomplishment, Less Behavior

More Accomplishment, Less Behavior

We hear it uttered by change practitioners all the time: behavior must change before the organization will change. Most often, such utterances are ill-informed and superficial. Time is spent trying to identify usually “bad” behavior and lagging measures are used to track its eradication. Even when the focus is on the “good” behavior we seek, we too often end up with a carrots-and-sticks approach to producing change. Could the approach be more wrong?

A compelling article by Dr. Carl Binder (2017) discusses the evolution of human performance technology (HPT) and emphasizes the importance of focusing on accomplishments rather than just behavior. The article highlights how defining accomplishments as countable nouns leads to simpler analysis, liberated behavior, and easier measurement, ultimately improving performance and engagement.

An accomplishment-based approach differs from behavior-focused methods by focusing on the valuable products of behavior rather than the behavior itself. Traditional methods often emphasize the behaviors or activities employees perform. An accomplishment-based approach, on the other hand, prioritizes the outcomes or "work outputs" that result from those behaviors. The value delivered by human performance, then, lies in the accomplishments it produces.

Accomplishments enhance the simplicity of performance analysis because there are typically fewer accomplishments than individual tasks or behaviors. By anchoring the analysis in accomplishments, it becomes more efficient to diagnose problems, address opportunities, and determine when behavior has been successful. Here's what Binder says about breaking down this simplification of performance analysis:

And according to Binder, accomplishment-based performance improvement considers the value of accomplishments in relation to the cost of the behavior required to produce them, reflecting a return on investment (ROI) perspective. The formula for ROI in human performance is the value of the accomplishments divided by the cost of the behavior.

In essence, the shift from behavior to accomplishments represents a paradigm shift in how human performance is viewed. Interventions designed with a focus on valuable accomplishments are more effective, sustainable, and economical than those starting elsewhere in the analysis and design process. Change management professionals can apply the concepts of accomplishment-based performance improvement in several ways to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of change initiatives.

First, instead of focusing on tasks or behaviors, change agents should identify and emphasize the valuable accomplishments that the change initiative aims to achieve. By clearly defining these accomplishments, they can create a compelling vision that resonates with stakeholders and drives engagement.

Next, to ensure everyone understands the goals of the change initiative, change agents can use the term "work outputs" to describe the tangible results of the change. This helps in setting clear expectations and aligning stakeholders around common objectives.

And finally, when designing learning programs to support the change initiative, change practitioners should focus on accomplishments as objectives rather than behaviors or competencies. This makes the training more relevant, easier to integrate with other behavior influences, leaner in design, and easier to assess.

See my LinkedIn Profile

Follow me on LinkedIn

Subscribe to Metamorphosis

?

Source:

Binder, C. (2017), “What it Really Means to be Accomplishment Based”, Performance Improvement, 56(4), 20-25.

vennela vigrahala

CISO Field Associate | Alert AI, the end to end GenAI Application Firewall

4 天前

Alert AI is end to end GenAI Application security platform, AI agents for Security Operations and Workflows, and end-to-end, interoperable GenAI security platform to secure GenAI applications, AI & data privacy controls.Charles Haywood. great post!????

回复
Gideon White

Strategic planning | Operations excellence | Programme assurance | Continuous improvement

6 天前

Thank you for this post. End may or may not justify the means, and vice versa... perhaps, which comes first: the chicken or the egg. Success of initiatives is defined by those most powerful in the initiative, perhaps. Arguably, both ends and means seal the survivable deal. Made me wonder about whether anyone had one of those 2x2s based on ends-means so as to plot characterisation of change initiatives to inform risk potential assessment and engagement approach, e.g. positive-negative means vs positive-negative ends.

回复
Dr. Carl Binder

Accelerating Results Through the Performance of People

6 天前

Thanks, Charles. There's lots more at www.PerformanceThinking.TV

Tom Gray

OCM and SAP Enable Now Training Consultant

6 天前

I like the focus on accomplishments. That is what the organization is driving towards. I have worked with people who lagged behind on the enthusiasm expectations of the company, but they sure could deliver. While they may not smile all the time their behavior as seen through the lens of productivity could match or exceed those smiling faces they were teamed with.

Chris Whaley

I help organizations drive results while fostering engagement and collaboration. A speaker, coach, and facilitator with expertise in project management and HR. Founder of EscapeToExpand.com

1 周

For many changes, the desired objectives already include tangible accomplishments in the form of business results. Behaviors are often seen as a leading indicator with the process results lagging. They are BOTH important and we can get different insights by analyzing them holistically.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Charles Haywood的更多文章

  • Shaping Readiness

    Shaping Readiness

    Communication plays a crucial role in how employees react to organizational change. It can determine whether change…

  • Beyond Resistance: Cultivating Change Engagement

    Beyond Resistance: Cultivating Change Engagement

    Change engagement is a positive psychological state that employees experience when they are enthusiastic and willing to…

    2 条评论
  • The Change Measurement Paradox

    The Change Measurement Paradox

    Frequently talked about, though often poorly executed, measuring change success can be vexing for change agents. So why…

    1 条评论
  • "Lighten Up, Francis!"

    "Lighten Up, Francis!"

    “Change management is dead!” “Change management must change.” “Need to re-think change management.

    2 条评论
  • Exploring Change Capacity

    Exploring Change Capacity

    Change capacity, broadly defined as an organization’s ability to effectively initiate, manage, and sustain change, is…

    3 条评论
  • Is the Primacy of Individual Change Simply Folklore?

    Is the Primacy of Individual Change Simply Folklore?

    In “ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government and our Community” (2006), Jeffrey Hiatt suggests that successful…

    5 条评论
  • Change Sponsorship in Perspective

    Change Sponsorship in Perspective

    “?????????????????????? ???? ?????? #1 ?????? ?????????????????????? ???? ???????????? ??????????????.” This is…

    6 条评论
  • The Power of Intentional Influence

    The Power of Intentional Influence

    While it is generally acknowledged that stakeholder engagement differs from stakeholder management, some ambiguity…

    1 条评论
  • Readiness and Resistance: Coexisting Forces

    Readiness and Resistance: Coexisting Forces

    While past organizational change management literature viewed resistance and readiness as opposite poles on a…

    1 条评论
  • Integrating Planned & Emergent Change

    Integrating Planned & Emergent Change

    In much of the recent debate regarding planned and emergent change, it is presented as a dichotomy, an either/or…

    1 条评论