More Accomplishment, Less Behavior
We hear it uttered by change practitioners all the time: behavior must change before the organization will change. Most often, such utterances are ill-informed and superficial. Time is spent trying to identify usually “bad” behavior and lagging measures are used to track its eradication. Even when the focus is on the “good” behavior we seek, we too often end up with a carrots-and-sticks approach to producing change. Could the approach be more wrong?
A compelling article by Dr. Carl Binder (2017) discusses the evolution of human performance technology (HPT) and emphasizes the importance of focusing on accomplishments rather than just behavior. The article highlights how defining accomplishments as countable nouns leads to simpler analysis, liberated behavior, and easier measurement, ultimately improving performance and engagement.
An accomplishment-based approach differs from behavior-focused methods by focusing on the valuable products of behavior rather than the behavior itself. Traditional methods often emphasize the behaviors or activities employees perform. An accomplishment-based approach, on the other hand, prioritizes the outcomes or "work outputs" that result from those behaviors. The value delivered by human performance, then, lies in the accomplishments it produces.
Accomplishments enhance the simplicity of performance analysis because there are typically fewer accomplishments than individual tasks or behaviors. By anchoring the analysis in accomplishments, it becomes more efficient to diagnose problems, address opportunities, and determine when behavior has been successful. Here's what Binder says about breaking down this simplification of performance analysis:
And according to Binder, accomplishment-based performance improvement considers the value of accomplishments in relation to the cost of the behavior required to produce them, reflecting a return on investment (ROI) perspective. The formula for ROI in human performance is the value of the accomplishments divided by the cost of the behavior.
In essence, the shift from behavior to accomplishments represents a paradigm shift in how human performance is viewed. Interventions designed with a focus on valuable accomplishments are more effective, sustainable, and economical than those starting elsewhere in the analysis and design process. Change management professionals can apply the concepts of accomplishment-based performance improvement in several ways to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of change initiatives.
First, instead of focusing on tasks or behaviors, change agents should identify and emphasize the valuable accomplishments that the change initiative aims to achieve. By clearly defining these accomplishments, they can create a compelling vision that resonates with stakeholders and drives engagement.
Next, to ensure everyone understands the goals of the change initiative, change agents can use the term "work outputs" to describe the tangible results of the change. This helps in setting clear expectations and aligning stakeholders around common objectives.
And finally, when designing learning programs to support the change initiative, change practitioners should focus on accomplishments as objectives rather than behaviors or competencies. This makes the training more relevant, easier to integrate with other behavior influences, leaner in design, and easier to assess.
See my LinkedIn Profile
Follow me on LinkedIn
Subscribe to Metamorphosis
?
Source:
Binder, C. (2017), “What it Really Means to be Accomplishment Based”, Performance Improvement, 56(4), 20-25.
CISO Field Associate | Alert AI, the end to end GenAI Application Firewall
4 天前Alert AI is end to end GenAI Application security platform, AI agents for Security Operations and Workflows, and end-to-end, interoperable GenAI security platform to secure GenAI applications, AI & data privacy controls.Charles Haywood. great post!????
Strategic planning | Operations excellence | Programme assurance | Continuous improvement
6 天前Thank you for this post. End may or may not justify the means, and vice versa... perhaps, which comes first: the chicken or the egg. Success of initiatives is defined by those most powerful in the initiative, perhaps. Arguably, both ends and means seal the survivable deal. Made me wonder about whether anyone had one of those 2x2s based on ends-means so as to plot characterisation of change initiatives to inform risk potential assessment and engagement approach, e.g. positive-negative means vs positive-negative ends.
Accelerating Results Through the Performance of People
6 天前Thanks, Charles. There's lots more at www.PerformanceThinking.TV
OCM and SAP Enable Now Training Consultant
6 天前I like the focus on accomplishments. That is what the organization is driving towards. I have worked with people who lagged behind on the enthusiasm expectations of the company, but they sure could deliver. While they may not smile all the time their behavior as seen through the lens of productivity could match or exceed those smiling faces they were teamed with.
I help organizations drive results while fostering engagement and collaboration. A speaker, coach, and facilitator with expertise in project management and HR. Founder of EscapeToExpand.com
1 周For many changes, the desired objectives already include tangible accomplishments in the form of business results. Behaviors are often seen as a leading indicator with the process results lagging. They are BOTH important and we can get different insights by analyzing them holistically.