No Accident

No Accident

There is a hard core of campaigners for vehicle safety in the U.S. – railing against the conditions that enable a daily toll of nearly 100 highway fatalities in this country. Within this community of individuals and organizations there are no references to traffic accidents, only crashes.

I recently ran afoul of one of the most outspoken leaders of this fragmented movement, Candace Lightner. Candace is president of WeSaveLives and founder of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). Candace expressed her displeasure with me after I referred to “accidents” in a blog about California legislation (https://tinyurl.com/oukscr9 - Assembly Bill 1264) for the creation of a database for the notification of the next of kin of crash victims.

I describe these groups and individuals as “fragmented” because the movement comprises individuals and organizations that approach the challenge of mitigating highway fatalities from a variety of angles. These organizations and individuals include:

  • Ms. Lightner, WeSaveLives
  • Deborah Hersman, former chair of the National Transportation Safety Board and now president and CEO of the National Safety Council
  • Louis Lombardo, a former research scientist at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and current principal of Louis V. Lombardo LLC and member of the Association of Air Medical Services
  • Sean Kane, founder and president of Safety Research & Strategies

There are other safety advocates and organizations but these individuals stand out in my mind for their singular focus on a particular safe driving issue such as driver distraction, drunk driving, emergency response at crash scenes or vehicle testing and recall protocols. All agree that the U.S. has some of the most advanced infrastructure for safety system development and deployment but with some of the worst outcomes in the world.

The bad outcome from all the research and rule making is the nearly 100 daily fatalities from crashes which ranks the U.S., on an annual basis, fourth in the world behind China, India and Brazil. The U.S. crash fatality RATE is at least twice the average for Europe.

The strange thing about these individuals and their organizations is the limited following they appear to inspire and the lack of widespread outrage. The U.S. continues to stumble in its efforts to mitigate highway fatalities, but the general public barely takes notice.

There are no marches on Washington for vehicle safety – even though safety is one of the top criteria for car buyers. Volvo continues to be the main standard bearer for vehicle safety, but few car makers are lining up to raise high the safety banner. (Yes, Mercedes, Nissan, Subaru, Toyota and Honda have taken some steps in their marketing and advertising messages – but no car maker has signed up to Volvo’s Vision Zero proposition – that no one should be killed or seriously injured in a new Volvo - or your brand of car - by 2020)

Car makers and suppliers testified, uncomfortably, before the U.S. Congress in 2014 attempting to explain failures of airbags and ignition switches. But not much has changed, although legislation was passed last week calling for:

  • Motor vehicle owners to be informed of outstanding recalls on their vehicles at the same time the DMV sends out a registration renewal reminder, or, for a new registration, at the same time the DMV sends out the proof of registration documentation;
  • Motor vehicle owners to complete all safety recalls before renewing their registration. Exceptions include if: (1) the vehicle owner wasn’t notified of the recall when the registration renewal reminder came out, (2) the manufacturer lacks the parts or labor to complete the recall, or (3) the vehicle owner demonstrates that he/she had no reasonable opportunity to fulfill the recall, in which case the DMV can grant a temporary registration of up to 60 days.

I am not a fan of government involvement in the auto industry. But if the auto industry cannot close the safety gap, government intervention is the logical recourse.

It's a global problem. At the Future Networked Car 2015 event last week, as part of the Geneva Motor Show, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe reported on its progress toward approving a global regulation for an Accident Emergency Call System (AECS) by October 2015. (Yup, they’re going to have to repair that acronym – to CECS.) While UNECE would like to halve global annual highway fatalities by 2020, the expectation is that the annual death toll will actually rise, surpassing two million by 2025, according to the World Health Organization.

But these statistics are merely data until individuals are touched by tragedy. The first small step is to recognize the magnitude of the problem - billions of economic losses and millions of lost lives. The second step is to take action.

Car makers, regulators, politicians, traffic and transport authorities and the media are all implicated in our broken efforts to make driving safer in the U.S. and the rest of the world. The simplest thing for everyone to do is to never again call a crash an accident.

Glenn Mercer

Automotive Research and Advisory Services

10 年

Another great post! I think, though, I can suggest one explanation for why there isn't more outrage re the SAFETY RECALL part of the problem. NHTSA says vehicle problems are responsible for only 2% of all crashes (94% is driver problems, 2% environment, 2% other). So, of those 100 fatalities per day, by NHTSA's numbers, only 2 were the fault of the vehicle... and I'll bet of those 2 less than half were due to an OEM design or manufacturing error (which would trigger a recall), as opposed to poor maintenance of the vehicle or some part just plain wearing out. So while I am indeed surprised there is not more public concern re the fatality rate, I can see why the public is not so upset about recall issues (e.g. failures to execute recall-mandated procedures on used cars before resale) within that overall problem: it's just not a huge part of the problem.

回复
Richard W Pryor

Automotive Executive over 30 years of experience

10 年

I truly believe that movements such as MADD have influenced our government officials to strongly support them. Thanks to all for that. The topic you present with this posting is very bold on your part. There is no wrong that I see, only that more can be done. Such as topics of texting while driving and/or use of cell phone phones. Those are now the number 1 cause of accidents and fatalities in our country. We all must unite like Candace did and rid this practice. It can't be up to automotive manufacturers. 1.5 seconds while looking at a cell phone is the equivalent of the length of a football field and highway limits of speed. It's like driving blindfolded. Eeeek!

回复
Damian Scott (MSP)

New Solution Delivery

10 年

Good article, with good intentions but I must ask - why does your headline contradict your conclusion. In all education and marketing advice I have read the writing down of a negative/wrong statement dilutes the message.

回复
Cyril Bourdon

Biolandes / Golgemma

10 年

don't you think that a driving licence obtained at 16 with almost no training at all, might be an issue regarding road safety ?

Tom Everson

"Keep Kids Alive Drive 25" -Specializing in Traffic Safety, Youth, Family, and Risk Issues

10 年

Thank you Roger for challenging us to be more and to do better in mobilizing the masses to help realize that "Target Zero" goal by virtue of raising manufacturing standards while at the same time engaging in behaviors behind the wheel that work to preserve the lives of all on and along roadways.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Roger C. Lanctot的更多文章

  • Gentherm: Finding Your Temperate Zone

    Gentherm: Finding Your Temperate Zone

    At this time of year in the Northern Hemisphere the average person finds themselves moving through various temperature…

    1 条评论
  • The Last Car Guy

    The Last Car Guy

    Shed a tear for the fate Of the last lonely eagle For you know that he never will land -- "Last Lonely Eagle" New…

    97 条评论
  • Mobileye: The Great AV Impediment

    Mobileye: The Great AV Impediment

    Mobileye CEO Amnon Shashua has begun to sound more and more like Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Both executives make bold…

    11 条评论
  • CES 2025: The 4th Screen is 3 Screens

    CES 2025: The 4th Screen is 3 Screens

    The 58th Consumer Electronics Show saw an epic battle being fought for automotive cockpits and ultimately the hearts…

    11 条评论
  • CES 2025: ChatGPT Out! Edge AI In!

    CES 2025: ChatGPT Out! Edge AI In!

    During CES 2024 it seemed as if ChatGPT was on the rise and would take over in-vehicle interactions. In fact, emerging…

    8 条评论
  • Building Community around Safety

    Building Community around Safety

    An unusual reception was hosted by Newlab at Michigan Central last week. City and state officials from across Michigan…

    5 条评论
  • Jensen and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat

    Jensen and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat

    Jensen Huang, the white-haired, 61-year-old, president, co-founder, and chief executive officer of Nvidia and chief…

    5 条评论
  • Regulatory Regression

    Regulatory Regression

    The U.S.

    6 条评论
  • CES 2025: Video in the Dash

    CES 2025: Video in the Dash

    Is the car the third screen or the fourth screen? It's confusing especially with suppliers like 3Ready and 4Screen…

    7 条评论
  • CES 2025: The Nine Lives of EVs

    CES 2025: The Nine Lives of EVs

    Can it be just nine years ago that wannabe EV maker Faraday Future introduced the FF01 “supercar” on a dark drizzly…

    5 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了