Accessibility in Education - a new nudge for universities
At the risk of being mildly controversial, it's time we started to move digital accessibility away from disabled people. I'm excited about a new, free resource to help with that move.
The focus of legislation has changed
The more mature digital legislation becomes, the less it requires the existence of disabled people to justify good practices. In many countries, accessibility legislation applies to all public sector bodies whether or not a disabled person ever looks at their website. The European Accessibility Act?will embed accessibility considerations in a wide range of digital services and products, irrespective of how many disabled customers they have.?
What is at stake here is a long overdue professionalisation of digital skills. It shifts the focus from the abilities or disabilities of the user to the abilities (or lack) of the person creating the product or service.?
Education providers look at the wrong people.
In the education context, the discussion is focused too often around disabled students and the difficulties they have accessing study materials. This entirely misses the point. The "disabling" takes place not because they are neurodiverse or visually impaired but because of the poor accessibility of the Word documents, PDFs and presentations they have to use. The person needing support is not the dyslexic student struggling to find key content in a long document or the blind student trying to find the key hyperlink they need. The lecturer is the "disabled" person, the one whose digital skill gap leaves them creating amateur documents in a professional setting and disabling dozens of others in the process.
Publication opportunities provide a different hook.
And this is why I am delighted to see the recent guidance from the Institute of Professional Editors - Books without Barriers. Many university lecturers are as committed to their research as they are to their students, maybe even more so. But the currency of research is publication. And when publishers begin to require base line levels of accessible practice, higher education has a vested interest in adopting professional practice.
The culture shifts from "I do this in case I have a disabled student" towards a healthier and more sustainable "I do this because that's the professional practice and I am a professional."?
领英推荐
So this is my Big Ask. It is entirely achievable.
The right priorities in a timely way
I've read too many author guidelines that provide detailed guidance on "How To Capitalise Titles" yet remain unaccountably silent on how to use heading styles or create an accessible table.
More accessible manuscripts translate more quickly to more accessible publications, and the European Accessibility Act has much to say about that. By helping make accessible practice a baseline professional requirement (and adding it to job descriptions for anyone creating digital content), you'll shift the focus away from the end user and back to the skills of the author.?Admittedly, we need to consider both, but an unrelenting focus on the end user can create both a resentment in the writer (why do I need to do this?) and a dependency in the reader (please do this for me!).
Let's see it as it is. There are right ways of creating digital content and wrong ways. Forget about disabled people for a moment; if your job description involves creating digital content, you should be doing it the right way as a professional.
A lot of disabled readers will thank you for that.
Accessibility Specialist at Springer Nature
1 年I absolutely adore the opening line: “The more mature digital legislation becomes, the less it requires the existence of disabled people to justify good practice”. Thank you for that excellent text.
Senior Accessibility Specialist | Passionate Accessibility Advocate + Educator
1 年Thank you, Alistair, a great article.
Accessible Solutions Architect at University of Southampton
1 年Great points in this article Alistair! Setting accessibility as an element of professional practice is a great strategy. I often try to introduce accessibility in this context in internal webinars here and try to not mention accessibility until a bit later and set it as "when you do this your results will be more professional and aligned to our corporate culture, oh and there's lots of other benefits...". I can still feel a bit of a conflict between focussing on removing barriers to those with disabilities though. Perhaps it's not that one is more valid than the other, just different ways of convincing people to change their behaviours toward better outcomes. I do still feel a moral conflict around this though. On another note, our research portal is meant to only accept research in PDF/A3 format which should include tagging and therefore more accessibility benefits when tagged correctly. My colleague Jonathan Lightfoot is finding lots of interesting accessibility puzzles to resolve while helping research postgraduates to create accessible PDFs of their theses.
IPEd accredited freelance editor | Lecturer in editing and proofreading | Trainer in editing for accessibility | Co-author of Books Without Barriers
1 年This article makes some very important points, thank you Alistair.
Researcher | Educator | Trainer | Community builder | Accessibility | Usability | Human rights
1 年Exciting times! Nothing beats the right thing to do.