Accelerating the Process of Trademark Cancellation for Nonuse or Abandonment

Trademark cancellation has become an essential tool for maintaining the accuracy of the Trademark Register. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) is committed to addressing marks that no longer serve their intended purpose in commerce. Through its Expedited Cancellation Proceedings pilot program, the TTAB aims to fast-track cases where trademark cancellation grounds are limited to nonuse or abandonment. This article provides an in-depth understanding of how this program works and offers practical insights for Petitioners seeking to navigate the process effectively.

?

The Purpose of Expedited Cancellation Proceedings

In an effort to maintain the integrity of the Trademark Register, the TTAB launched the Expedited Cancellation Proceedings pilot program. This initiative is designed to streamline cases involving nonuse or abandonment, which are two common grounds for trademark cancellation. By prioritizing these cases, the TTAB seeks to eliminate inactive marks from the register, thereby making space for new, active trademarks.

The pilot program identifies eligible cases early in the process and accelerates their resolution. This approach benefits both Petitioners and the TTAB by reducing the time and resources required to address straightforward cancellation cases. While the traditional cancellation process can take up to 18 months or more, expedited cases under this program are typically resolved within nine to eleven months.

?

What Triggers a Trademark Cancellation?

Trademark cancellation grounds typically involve either nonuse or abandonment. Nonuse occurs when a registrant fails to use the trademark in connection with the goods or services listed in their registration. Abandonment, on the other hand, involves the registrant ceasing use of the trademark with no intention of resuming it. These issues undermine the purpose of trademarks, which is to signify the source of goods or services in commerce.

The TTAB’s pilot program specifically targets cases where these grounds are alleged. Petitioners seeking to cancel a trademark must clearly outline their claims and provide sufficient evidence to support their position. Cases that meet the criteria for the pilot program are fast-tracked, allowing for a quicker resolution.

?

Key Steps in Expedited Cancellation Proceedings

1. Filing a Petition for Cancellation: The process begins with the Petitioner filing a Cancellation Petition with the TTAB. This document must outline the trademark cancellation grounds, such as nonuse or abandonment, and provide relevant details to support the claim.
2. Respondent’s Answer: Once the Petition is filed, the registrant (Respondent) has a set period to file an Answer. If the Respondent fails to respond, the TTAB may issue a default judgment, resulting in the cancellation of the trademark. This can occur within five to six months of the Petition’s filing.
3. Selection for Expedited Proceedings: If the Respondent files an Answer, the TTAB may select the case for the pilot program. Selected cases proceed under an accelerated timeline, with the TTAB facilitating a streamlined process to address the issues at hand.
4. Discovery Conference: In expedited cases, the TTAB schedules a discovery conference. This meeting involves the parties, an Interlocutory Attorney, and an Administrative Judge. The conference aims to identify ways to simplify the case, such as stipulating facts, limiting discovery, and exploring alternative case resolution methods.
5. Evidence Submission: Petitioners must present evidence to support their claims. This may include proof of nonuse, evidence of abandonment, or documentation showing three consecutive years of nonuse in commerce. Strong evidence is critical to building a compelling case.
6. Resolution and Judgment: Expedited cases often involve streamlined procedures, such as the summary judgment ACR model. This approach allows the TTAB to make decisions based on submitted motions and evidence, avoiding the need for a full trial. The result is a faster resolution of the case.

?

Strategies for Petitioners

To succeed in an expedited trademark cancellation case, Petitioners should focus on the following strategies:

1. Clearly Define the Scope of Cancellation: Determine whether you are seeking total or partial cancellation. Total cancellation applies if the trademark is not used for any goods or services listed in the registration. Partial cancellation may be pursued if only certain goods or services have been abandoned.
2. Gather Strong Evidence: Evidence is the cornerstone of any cancellation case. Collect documentation that demonstrates nonuse, abandonment, or the registrant’s lack of intent to resume use. Examples include business records, marketing materials, and witness testimony.
3. Leverage the Discovery Conference: Use the discovery conference to simplify the case. Work with the opposing party and TTAB representatives to identify areas of agreement, limit discovery, and explore expedited resolution methods.
4. Consider Alternative Case Resolution Models: The summary judgment ACR model offers a faster path to resolution by allowing the TTAB to decide the case based on submitted evidence and motions. Petitioners should explore this option if it aligns with their case strategy.
5. Engage Experienced Legal Counsel: Navigating trademark cancellation proceedings can be complex. Experienced trademark attorneys can provide valuable guidance, ensuring that your case is well-prepared and aligned with TTAB requirements.

?

Overcoming Challenges in Proving Nonuse or Abandonment

Proving trademark cancellation grounds such as nonuse or abandonment can be challenging, particularly if the registrant disputes the claims. Petitioners must meet a high standard of proof, demonstrating that the registrant discontinued use of the trademark with no intent to resume it. Alternatively, Petitioners can establish a prima facie case by showing three consecutive years of nonuse in commerce.

Once a prima facie case is established, the burden shifts to the registrant to provide evidence of use or intent to resume use. This evidence may include justifications for nonuse, such as business interruptions or plans to reintroduce the trademark in commerce. Petitioners must be prepared to counter these arguments with compelling evidence of their own.

?

Case Study: TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. v. Jeffrey E. Martin

The challenges of expedited proceedings are exemplified in the case of TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. v. Jeffrey E. Martin (Cancellation No. 92068042, December 7, 2018). In this case, the Petitioner participated in the pilot program and agreed to limit discovery. However, the lack of sufficient evidence hindered their ability to meet the burden of proof, resulting in the dismissal of the Petition for Cancellation.

This case highlights the importance of strong evidence and strategic preparation. Petitioners must carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of expedited proceedings, particularly when discovery is limited. While the pilot program offers a faster resolution, it also requires Petitioners to present a well-prepared case with robust evidence.

?

Benefits and Limitations of Expedited Proceedings

The Expedited Cancellation Proceedings pilot program offers several benefits:

• Faster Resolution: Cases are typically resolved within nine to eleven months, compared to the traditional 18-month timeline.
• Streamlined Process: The program reduces the complexity of cancellation proceedings, focusing on the core issues of nonuse or abandonment.
• Cost Savings: A shorter timeline and simplified process can reduce legal costs for Petitioners.

However, the program also has limitations:

• Limited Discovery: Expedited cases may involve reduced discovery, which can make it challenging to gather sufficient evidence.
• High Standard of Proof: Petitioners must present compelling evidence to meet the burden of proof and counter any arguments from the registrant.
• Case Selection Criteria: Not all cases are eligible for the pilot program, and selection is at the discretion of the TTAB.

?

Final Thoughts

Trademark cancellation is a vital mechanism for maintaining the integrity of the Trademark Register. The TTAB’s Expedited Cancellation Proceedings pilot program offers a faster, more efficient pathway for addressing cases of nonuse or abandonment. However, success in these proceedings requires careful preparation, strong evidence, and a clear understanding of the process.

Petitioners should weigh the benefits and challenges of expedited proceedings and develop a strategic approach to their cases. By leveraging the insights provided in this article, Petitioners can improve their chances of achieving a favorable outcome. For additional guidance on trademark cancellation or assistance with specific cases, contact one of our Trademark Attorneys for expert advice.

?