Accelerating Agility: A Decision-Making Framework for Organizational Speed
Anish Padinjaroote
Transforming workplace culture to attract, engage, and retain top talent | Strategic leader with global experience in diverse sectors | Fusing AI & Design in engineering Human-Centric Solutions | Lifelong Learner
“The speed of decision making is the essence of good governance.”? – Piyush Goyal
It’s critical for CXOs, founders, Investors, business leaders of startups or organizations; to sharpen their own decision-making skill set and maintain systems that allow the people in the company to continue making high-quality decisions.
“Decision making is the specific executive task.” – Peter Drucker
Without a solid decision making process in place, we risk amplifying the cognitive biases, that we all hold.? A more systemic approach will not only improve the decision quality, but it will also improve knowledge sharing among the team and get high quality feedback, so we can get better faster.
“All the paths kneel before the decisive minds!” – Mehmet Murat ildan
I, strongly believe we have two key aspects to be considered while deciding.?
Just so that it’s easier to recollect, understand and share, I’ve made this 2x2 matrix to help make informed, faster and better decisions.?
I.?Irreversible decision, taken Unilaterally: (High Risk decisions)
?In situations where decisions carry irreversible consequences, the approach of unilateral decision-making should be fraught with risks and potential negative outcomes.? While it may seem efficient or expedient for one party to make decisions without consulting others, several significant drawbacks merit consideration:
Lack of Diverse Perspectives: Neglecting input from others leads to missed insights and alternative solutions.
Limited Problem-Solving Capacity: Restricting ideas and strategies hampers effective problem-solving.
Increased Risk of Oversight: Critical factors may be overlooked, leading to significant repercussions.
Impaired Relationships and Trust: Marginalization erodes trust and hinders future collaboration.
II. Irreversible decision, taken Consensually: (Strategic/Long term decisions)
?In scenarios where decisions carry irreversible consequences, opting for consensual decision-making can offer several advantages:
Complex and Uncertain Environments: When faced with complex challenges or uncertain outcomes, diverse perspectives help identify potential risks and opportunities.
High-Stakes Decisions: In situations where the consequences of the decision are significant and long-lasting, involving stakeholders ensures thorough consideration and accountability.
Interdependent Relationships: When decisions impact multiple parties or departments, collaborative approaches foster alignment of goals and coordination of efforts.
Building Organizational Culture: Consensual decision-making contributes to a culture of inclusivity, trust, and collaboration, which is essential for long-term success and resilience.
领英推荐
III. Reversible decision, taken Unilaterally: (Quick operational decisions)
In situations where outcomes are reversible, unilateral decision-making can offer several distinct advantages. Business level Innovation, growth and performance decisions.
Speed and Efficiency: Unilateral decisions allow swift action without prolonged deliberation.?
Clear Accountability: Single decision-makers ensure straightforward responsibility assignment.
Agility and Adaptability: Rapid adjustments can be made in response to changing circumstances.
Alignment with Goals: Decisions closely match strategic objectives without compromise.
Reduced Conflict: Minimized friction as decisions are made without extensive negotiation.
However, it's essential to balance the benefits of unilateral decision-making with the need for inclusivity and collaboration in situations where diverse perspectives and stakeholder input are critical for achieving optimal outcomes.
IV. Reversible decision, taken Consensually: (Tactical & deliberate decisions)
Consensual decision-making offers numerous benefits in SNAFU (Situation Normal. All F*&%$d Up!) scenarios, including enhanced problem-solving, stakeholder buy-in, and risk mitigation.? By prioritizing collaboration, organizations can navigate challenges more effectively and achieve sustainable outcomes.
Complex Problems: When facing complex challenges that require a deep understanding of various factors and potential solutions.
High-Stakes Decisions: In situations where the consequences of the decision are significant, involving stakeholders helps ensure thorough consideration and accountability.
Interdependent Relationships: When decisions impact multiple parties or departments, collaborative approaches facilitate coordination and alignment of goals.
Innovation and Creativity: For initiatives that require creative problem-solving or innovation, diverse perspectives foster the generation of novel ideas and approaches.
Conclusion:?
While all of us in theory, know the right thing to do.? In practice; when there's pressure to meet the quotas or get a new initiative off the ground, or stuck in a bad scenario we tend to do the opposite of this framework in most cases.?
“Nothing is more difficult, and therefore more precious, than to be able to decide.” – Napoleon Bonaparte
Many of us feel that adhering to a decision-making system slows us down, but knowing how to take unilateral / consensual vs. reversible / irreversible decision, saves a lot of time, energy and will be the key differentiator of the business speed and success.?
In essence, speed and clear decision-making aren't just desirable traits; they're essential for navigating today's business landscape successfully, driving innovation, staying competitive, improving cost efficiency and delivering value to clients.
“Truly successful decision-making relies on a balance between deliberate and instinctive thinking.” – Malcolm Gladwell
Cheers, anish
Building AI That People Love—Not Just Tolerate
11 个月The opening sentences Anish Padinjaroote seemed typically motivational, but as I reached the 2x2 section, I found myself not just reading, but reflecting deeply. Somehow, it led me to envision making a decision as tuning a radio, with the dials guiding us to the correct choice. Here's a playful addition to the inspiring read.
CTO @ Gigafact
11 个月Bezos has this one way door and two way door decision making analogous to the irreversible?and reversible decisions. He believes in empowering everyone in the organisation to decide when the decision is a two way door, make mistakes and learn from them, quickly iterate and move forward . But for 1 way door the buck stops with him and the leadership team - there is a huge price to pay for the org if a single door decision goes bad. So take as much time as needed to get it right.
Financial Services (Insurance)- Business, Operations and Technology ; Strategy & Execution
11 个月Well written with apt quotes Relevant points that are hard to practice
CMO (Global) & Head-Global Channels, Investor, Analyst, Public Relations at SEQURETEK. 38 years of Marketing, Sales and Technology Leadership experience @Cisco, IBM, HCL Tech, Novell, NTT Netmagic, Star TV, CSS Corp
11 个月Excellent article Anish Padinjaroote
Sr. Vice President Marketplace Business & Operations at Vahan driving Growth
11 个月Very interesting read indeed Anish,. My take is that the decision making process/framework also evolves with the organisation & the environment itself. Consensual decisions in a start up midscale organisation will sometimes slow down the organisation while unilateral decisions in scaled up organisation/ mature industries will create cartels & factions which will polarise the organisation. In my mind All business decisions should be reversible especially when technology is evolving rapidly otherwise we know the story of Yahoo rejecting Google & Nokia rejecting Android... :)