Are Academics Holding Sri Lankan Universities Back?

Sri Lankan universities are staffed with highly qualified academics—PhD holders, MBA graduates, senior lecturers, and professors. Yet, despite their impressive credentials, these institutions struggle to achieve global recognition, with none making it to the top 100 in university rankings.

One glaring issue is the disconnect between theoretical knowledge and practical application. However, a deeper concern lies in the attitude of many PhD holders, especially those who have obtained their qualifications from foreign universities. A significant portion of these academics shows limited interest in advancing the institutions where they work, treating their roles merely as jobs for earning a living rather than as opportunities to drive transformation.

A System Overloaded with Theory

Many Sri Lankan academics are deeply knowledgeable in their fields but operate in an academic bubble. Their focus on theoretical frameworks often leads to teaching that is detached from real-world challenges. As a result, graduates are equipped with bookish knowledge but struggle to apply it effectively in professional environments.

The Problem of Detached Academics

A substantial number of Sri Lankan PhD holders have earned their degrees from prestigious foreign universities. While this exposure should ideally bring global expertise into local institutions, the reality is often different. Many of these academics view their roles in Sri Lankan universities as mere jobs rather than as platforms to contribute to institutional development.

This mindset results in a lack of passion and innovation in their work. Instead of channeling their expertise into improving academic programs, engaging in impactful research, or mentoring the next generation, many settle for fulfilling the minimum requirements of their roles. This lack of commitment directly impacts the quality and global competitiveness of Sri Lankan universities.

Missing Links to Industry

Globally ranked universities prioritize hiring faculty with both academic and industry experience. However, in Sri Lanka, many academics progress through traditional academic pathways, with minimal exposure to practical work environments. This disconnect leaves students underprepared for real-world challenges, perpetuating the gap between education and employment.

Resistance to Modernization

Despite advancements in technology, pedagogy, and global academic trends, many senior lecturers and professors remain resistant to change. Outdated teaching methods and a reluctance to adopt interdisciplinary approaches hinder the innovation needed to keep pace with international standards.

Research with Limited Impact

Sri Lankan academics frequently focus on theoretical research, often for personal career advancement, rather than addressing real-world problems. Globally, universities are measured by the societal and industrial impact of their research, but in Sri Lanka, limited collaboration with industries and insufficient funding for applied research keep universities from achieving this standard.

The Mentorship Gap

One of the most significant shortcomings is the lack of effective mentorship. Many senior academics focus on lectures and publications, neglecting the role of mentoring students in critical areas like problem-solving, innovation, and leadership. This oversight leaves graduates ill-equipped to face dynamic, real-world environments.

Limited Global Perspective

Top-ranked universities foster global perspectives through international collaborations, exchange programs, and faculty with diverse experiences. In contrast, many Sri Lankan academics lack this global exposure. Even those who have studied abroad often fail to leverage their experience to bring fresh ideas or best practices to their local institutions.

A Path Toward Excellence

To elevate Sri Lankan universities to global prominence, a shift in academic culture and mindset is essential. The following steps could help bridge the gap:

1. Encourage Commitment to Institutional Growth: Universities must foster a culture where academics view their roles as contributions to national development, not just personal employment.
2. Integrate Industry Professionals into Academia: Bringing industry expertise into academic programs can bridge the gap between theory and practice.
3. Prioritize Applied Research: Research should focus on solving societal challenges and contributing to industries, ensuring its relevance and impact.
4. Regular Curriculum Updates: Aligning course content with global trends and industry demands can make graduates more competitive.
5. Invest in Global Exposure: Facilitating international collaborations and exchange programs for both faculty and students can bring fresh perspectives to local institutions.
6. Mentorship as a Priority: Academics must take their mentorship roles seriously, guiding students toward innovation, leadership, and critical thinking.

Conclusion

Sri Lanka’s academics are undoubtedly talented, but talent alone cannot drive progress without commitment and adaptability. The over-reliance on theoretical knowledge, coupled with a lack of passion for institutional development, has kept local universities stagnant.

For Sri Lankan universities to emerge as global contenders, academics must embrace a new mindset—one that values innovation, industry collaboration, and active engagement in institutional growth. By doing so, they can transform their institutions into centers of excellence and their students into globally competitive professionals.