The Absurdity of Negative Electricity Prices: A Hurdle in the Clean Energy Race
Samuel Rene Morillon
MD South East Asia, VP Pacific @ Siemens Energy | MBA. Lead, engage, decarbonize. Tech, digital and people enthusiast
The global transition towards a clean energy future is gaining momentum, with renewable energy sources like wind and solar playing an increasingly crucial role everywhere. This is great news! However, a seemingly paradoxical situation – negative electricity prices – is threatening to derail this progress. How is it possible that wind and solar farms are frequently forced to stop production to avoid losses, even though they should be prioritized over conventional power plants ? Prices can easily reach -30 AUD/MWh during a common sunny or windy day.
Electricity prices operate on a fundamental principle of supply and demand. Wholesale electricity markets function as platforms where generators bid to supply electricity at specific prices, while consumers bid on the amount they are willing to pay. The market clears at a price point where supply and demand meet. However, in certain circumstances, the equation can tilt, leading to negative prices:
Negative electricity prices pose a significant threat to the clean energy transition in several ways.
First of all, faced with negative prices, renewable energy producers may be forced to curtail their production, essentially wasting clean energy. This undermines the very purpose of investing in renewables – reducing dependence on fossil fuels.
Second, the uncertainty and potential financial losses associated with negative pricing can discourage further investment in renewable energy infrastructure. This creates a situation where existing renewable assets might become stranded, hindering the expansion of clean energy capacity.
Finally, negative pricing incentivizes the continued operation of conventional power plants, even when renewable energy is abundant. This not only negates the environmental benefits of renewables but also contributes to ongoing greenhouse gas emissions.
A stark example of this absurdity occurred in Germany in 2019, where wind farms were curtailed while coal plants continued to operate due to negative prices.?On Easter Monday, April 22nd, 2019, the country experienced a confluence of factors leading to negative electricity prices:
领英推荐
The Outcome:
Eliminating negative electricity prices is important to ensure a smooth and effective energy transition. Wind farms needs to run when there is wind !!!
One potential solution lies in the implementation or increase of a carbon price.
A carbon price acts as a disincentive for fossil fuel use by attaching a cost to carbon emissions. This cost is reflected in the price generators bid for electricity production. With a carbon price in place, conventional power plants would have to factor in the cost of emissions when bidding, making them less competitive compared to clean energy sources.
As of today, 46 countries?only have implemented some form of carbon pricing mechanism, including?Emissions Trading Systems (ETS) or?Carbon Taxes. This is clearly not enough. Up-coming Presidential elections in the US may have an impact on the decisions of many countries like Japan or Australia to set up or not a potential carbon market. This is a topic to follow to be successful.
Expert in Business Strategy, Corporate Growth and Commercial Excellence | Board Member | Brand Ambassador
7 个月What about working on smarter energy storage solutions first? I am not a big fan of batteries, but if every building could include some old EV batteries, we would require less power plants for backup ??
Senior Wind Energy Engineer at Bureau Veritas Renewables Division
7 个月If for wind and solar due to negative prices from supply demand situation, then why shouldn't be compensation credit be in place for lost energy for clean energy?